Treatment of Nature: An Ecocriticism Approach in ‘Komat Kamit’ of Tejo and Kamba’s Tuhan Maha Asik


  • Purwanto Siwi Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Burhanuddin Arafah Hasanuddin University
  • Sri Wulan Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Purwarno Purwarno Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Susi Ekalestari Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Azhariah Nur B. Arafah Universitas Gunadarma



natural environment, preserve nature, ecological sustainability, ecocriticism


This research was aimed at reflecting how Sujiwo Tejo and M. N. Kamba treat nature in Komat Kamit (murmuring), one of the chapters in their work entitled Tuhan Maha Asik. Tejo and Kamba explained clearly how humans have treated the natural environment. This research is considered important and worthwhile as it is an effort to raise human awareness about the importance of protecting and conserving nature. This also shows that a literary work can be a significant medium that also plays an important role in efforts to preserve nature or the environment. This study uses an ecocriticism approach, which is a study of the reflection of the interconnection between humans and nature in literary works. This research also uses descriptive qualitative in which the data obtained from the literary work are analyzed to determine the reciprocal relationship between humans and nature in Komat-Kamit, one of the chapters in Tejo and Kamba's Tuhan Maha Asik. The findings of this study indicate that how humans treat nature greatly affects the nature of the environment. Komat Kamit or murmuring is reflected as a habit to show human gratitude for nature to God. Such a habit also symbolizes human respect for nature. Human gratitude and respect for nature can result in ecological balance and sustainability. However, Komat Kamit, or murmuring implies that the relationship between humans and nature is not just words of praise to nature but must be realized with concrete actions to protect and preserve nature.

Author Biographies

Purwanto Siwi, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Faculty of Literature

Burhanuddin Arafah, Hasanuddin University

English Department, Faculty of Cultural Sciences

Sri Wulan, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Faculty of Literature

Purwarno Purwarno, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Faculty of Literature

Susi Ekalestari, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Faculty of Literature

Azhariah Nur B. Arafah, Universitas Gunadarma

Faculty of Psychology


Afiah, N. et al. (2022). Burmese Women Portrait under the British Imperialism in Orwell’s Burmese Days. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (1), 213-219.

Ahmadi, A. et al. (2019). Ecopsychology and Psychology of Literature: Concretization of Human Biophilia That Loves the Environment in Two Indonesian Novels. International Journal of Literary Humanities 17 (1), 47–59.

Andi, K. & Arafah, B. (2017). Using Needs Analysis to Develop English Teaching Materials in Initial Speaking Skills for Indonesian College Students of English. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art, and Communication (TOJDAC) (March).

Anggrawan, A. et al. (2019). Comparison of Online Learning versus Face to Face Learning in English Grammar Learning. 5th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED), pp. 1-4.

Arafah, B. et al. (2021). Saving the Environment: Environmental Lessons in Colin Thiele’s February Dragon. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12 (6), 935–941.

Arafah, B. & Hasyim, M. (2019). Linguistic Functions of Emoji in Social Media Communication. Opción, 35 (24), 558-574.

Arafah, B. & Hasyim, M. (2022). Social Media as a Gateway to Information: Digital Literacy on Current Issues in Social Media. Webology, 19 (1), 2491-2503.

Arafah, B. & Kaharuddin. (2019). The Representation of Complaints in English and Indonesian Discourses. Opción, 35 (24), 501- 517.

Arafah, B. et al. (2020). An Anthropological Linguistic Study on Maccera’ Bulung Ritual. Opción, 36 (27), 1592-1606.

Arafah, K. et al. (2020). Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy’s Role in Achievement Motivation and Physics Learning Outcomes. Opción, 36 (27), 1607-1623.

Arianto, B. et al. (2021). A Study of Ecocriticism on the Representations of Ecological Conditions in Rawa Gambut. Studies in English Language and Education 8(3), 1267–1284.

Asriyanti, S. et al. (2022). The Representation of Women’s Dependence on Men in Little Women. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12 (4), 790-796.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Buell, L. et al. (2011). Literature and Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 417–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855.

Fadillah, N. et al. (2022). The Act of Slavery in 20th Century as Reflected in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (1), 66-72.

Garrand, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.

Glotfelty, C. & Fromm, H., (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Georgia: University of Georgia Press Athens.

Hasjim, M. et al. (2020). Principles behind Semantic Relation between Common Abbreviations and their Expansions on Instagram. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2270-2276.

Hasyim, M. et al. (2020). The New Toraja Destination: Adding Value ‘Toraja coffee’ of the Sustainable Tourism Development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575 (1), 1-10.

Lestari, N. S. (2018). Environmental Issue in Literary Work. International Seminar on Recent Language, Literature, and Local Culture Studies (BASA 2018) 280 (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research), 462–470.

Mambrol, N. (2016). Ecocriticism: an Essay. Retrieved on November 27, 2021, from

Marland, P. (2013). Ecocriticism: Ecocriticism. Literature Compass, 10 (11), 846–68.

Mishra, Sandip Kumar (2016). Ecocriticism: A Study of Environmental Issues in Literature. BRICS Journal of Educational Research, 6 (4), 168-170.

Mishra, S. K., & Sarangi, I. (2017). Role of Literature in Environmental Awareness: An Ecocritical Study of Aranyak (of the Forest) by Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay. The Criterion, 8 (1), 280-287.

Mokoginta, K. & Arafah, B. (2022). Negotiation in Indonesian Culture: A Cultural Linguistic Analysis of Bahasa Indonesia Textbooks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12 (4), 691-701.

Murti, F. N. (2019). Indonesia’s Green Literature: ‘The Sleeping Beauty’ Literary. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 243 (1).

Mutmainnah et al. (2022). Racial Discrimination Experienced by Black People as Reflected in Langston Hughes's Poems. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (2), 350-356.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2019). Teori Pengkajian Fiksi (Fiction Analysis Theory) (12th ed.). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Özdemir, O. (2006). The effects of literature on the sensibility towards the environment and its value in the environmental education system. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 23, 159-167

Petersen, E. et al. (2019). The Role of Social Relational Emotions for Human-Nature Connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-6. Retrieved December on 29, 2021, from

Purwaningsih, Y. R. et al. (2020). An ambition of infidelity “Emma Bovary” as wife: Sexuality problems. Medicina Clínica Práctica, 3, 100-108.

Sabrina, A. (2021). The Voice of Human Ecology in the Novel the Bear (2020) by Andrew Krivak. Lingua Didaktika, 15 (2), 222–232.

Sunardi et al. (2018). Looking at the Shared Conception of Teaching Literature in an Indonesian ELT Setting. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (2), 316-327.

Tejo, S., and Kamba, M. N. (2020). Tuhan Maha Asik (God is Awesome). Tangerang: Imania.

Tosic, J. (2006). Ecocriticism–Interdisciplinary Study of Literature and Environment. Facta Universitatis 3(1), 43–50.

Yulianti, S. et al. (2022). Conversational Implicatures on Saturday Night Live Talk Show. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 189-197.