Science and Society: The Impact of Science Abuse on Social Life in Well’s The Invisible Man

Authors

  • Jumino Suhadi Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Burhanuddin Arafah Hasanuddin University
  • Fatnia Paramitha Makatita Hasanuddin University
  • Herawaty Abbas Hasanuddin University
  • Azhariah Nur B. Arafah Universitas Gunadarma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1206.22

Keywords:

science, abuse, society, The Invisible Man, Wells

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between science and society in The Invisible Man and elaborates the impact of science abuse on social life conveyed in H. G. Wells's The Invisible Man. This article uses the qualitative method and sociology of literature approach by Alan Swingewood and Diana Laurenson. The study result shows that the science abuse act committed by the main character later leads to social rejection and anger toward him. As the consequence, people hunted and murdered him.

Author Biographies

Jumino Suhadi, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

English Literature Department, Faculty of Letters

Burhanuddin Arafah, Hasanuddin University

English Department, Faculty of Cultural Sciences

Fatnia Paramitha Makatita, Hasanuddin University

English Language Study, Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences

Herawaty Abbas, Hasanuddin University

English Department, Faculty of Cultural Sciences

Azhariah Nur B. Arafah, Universitas Gunadarma

Faculty of Psychology

References

Afiah, N., Arafah, B., & Abbas, H. (2022). Burmese Women Portrait under the British Imperialism in Orwell’s Burmese Days. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (1), 213-219.

Andi, K., & Arafah, B. (2017). Using needs analysis to develop English teaching materials in initial speaking skills for Indonesian college students of English. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art, and Communication (TOJDAC), Special Edition, 419-436.

Arafah, B & Hasyim, M. (2022). Social Media as a Gateway to Information: Digital Literacy on Current Issue in Social Media. Webology, 19 (1), 2491-2503.

Arafah, B. & Hasyim, M. (2019). Linguistic functions of emoji in social media communication. Opcion, 35 (24), 558-574.

Arafah, B. & Kaharuddin. (2019). The Idol: A Model for Incorporating Literature in ELT. KnE Social Sciences, 2019, 43-59.

Arafah, B. & Kaharuddin. (2019). The Representation of Complaints in English and Indonesian Discourses. Opción, 35 (24), 501-517.

Arafah, B., Abbas, Herawaty, & Hikmah, Nurul. (2021). Saving the Environment: Environmental Lessons in Colin Thiele's February Dragon. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 12 (6), 935-941.

Arafah, B., Hasyim, M., Kapoyos, F. E. (2021). E-democracy and the Parrhesia Language of Netizen towards COVID-19 Pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5 (S1), 422-428.

Arafah, B., Kaharuddin, Mulyanto, Arifin, M. Bahri, Rofiqah, Ummu, Arafah, Azhariah Nur B. (2021). The Idol: An Innovative Model for Designing Literature-Based Elt Materials. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 1, 2075-2090

Arafah, B., Kaharuddin, Takwa, Arafah, Azhariah Nur B., Kadaruddin, Leba, Seli Marlina Raja. (2021). Promoting the Building up of Character Education Based on Literature, Culture, and Local Wisdom. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 1, 2129-2147.

Arafah, B., Thayyib, M., Kaharuddin, & Sahib, H. (2020). An anthropological linguistic study on Maccera’ Bulung ritual, Opción, 36 (27), 1592-1606.

Arafah, K., Arafah, A. N. B., & Arafah, B. (2020). Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy’s Role in Achievement Motivation and Physics Learning Outcomes. Opción, 36, (27), 1607-1623.

Ardiansah, M., Arafah. B., and Abbas, H. (2019). The Effect of Technology Abuse on Social Life as Reflected in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities. 2 (4), 607-611.

Bergonzi, B. (1961). The Early H. G. Wells: A Study in the Scientific Romances. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Burke, J., Bergman. J., and Asimov. I. (1983). The Impact of Science on Society. Washington DC: U.S Government Press.

Cantor, P.A. (1999). The Invisible Man and the Invisible Hand: H. G. Wells’s Critique of Capitalism. In P. A. Cantor & S. Cox (Eds), Literature and Economics of Liberty. Auburn AL: Ludwig Von Mises Institute.

Fadillah, N., Arafah, B., & Abbas, H. (2022). The Act of Slavery in 20th Century as Reflected in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (1), 66-72.

Gahatraj, B. (2021). Critique of Ethical Degradation in Wells’s The Invisible Man. Journal NX-A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal. 7 (4), 134-151.

Gunn, J. (2002). The Road to Science Fiction Vol 1: From Gilgamesh to Wells. Lanham Maryland: Scarecrow Press.

Hammond, J. R. (1979). An H. G. Wells Companion. London: Macmillan.

Handcock, T. (2017). Revelation and the Unseen in H. G. Wells’s The Invisible Man. Colloquy. 8 (25), 40-57.

Hasjim, M., Arafah, B., Kaharuddin, Verlin, S, & Genisa, R. A. A. (2020). Principles behind Semantic Relation between Common Abbreviations and their Expansions on Instagram. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2270-2276.

Hasyim, M., Arafah. B., & Kuswarini, P. (2020). The New Toraja Destination: Adding Value ‘Toraja Coffee’ of the Sustainable Tourism Development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575 (1), 1-10.

Irmawati, I., Arafah, B., & Abbas, H. (2020). The Lesson Life of Santiago as Main Character in Coelho’s The Alchemist. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 8 (1), 32-36.

Jadhav, A.M. (2014). The Historical Development of the Sociology Approach to the Study of Literature. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. 3 (5), 658-622.

McDonell, H., Nakadate, N.E., Pfordresher, J. and Shoemate, T.E. (1982). England in Literature (Medallion Edition). Illinois: Scott Foresman & Co.

McLean, S. (2009). The Early Fiction of H. G. Wells. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican War of Science. New York: Basic Books.

Purwaningsih, Yuni Ratna, Arafah, Burhanuddin, Abbas, Herawaty. (2020). An Ambition of infidelity “Emma Bovary” as wife: Sexuality problems. Medicina Clinica Practica, 3 (S1):100108, 1-3.

Roberts, A. (2016). The History of Science Fiction (2nd Edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rozell, D.J. (2020). Dangerous Science: Science Policy and Risk Analysis for Scientists and Engineers. London: Ubiquity Press.

Sayeau, M. (2005). H. G. Wells's The Time Machine and the Odd Consequences of Progress. Contemporary Justice Review. 8 (4), 431-445.

Sekar V, D.C. (2018). H.G. Wells's The Invisible Man: A Precursor to the Anonymous Netizen. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH. 6 (6), 350-358.

Singh, K. (1984). Science and Society: A Brief Look at The Invisible Man. The Wellsian. 7 (2), 19-23.

Sirabian, R. (2001). The Conception of Science in Wells’s The Invisible Man. Papers on Language & Literature. 37 (4), 382-403.

Spector, M., and Kitsuse. J.I. (1977). Constructing Social Problems. California: Cummings Pub.

Sunardi, S., Akil, M., Arafah, B., & Salija, K. (2018). Looking at the Shared Conception of Teaching Literature in an Indonesian ELT Setting. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (2), 316-327.

Swingewood, A., and Laurenson, D. (1972). The Sociology of Literature. New York: Shocken Books Inc.

Thomas, R. (2013). Science’s Harmful Power (Unpublished Thesis). Florida: Rollins College. Hamilton Holt School.

Tudge, C. (1999). The Use and Abuses of Science. SAGE Journals. 3 (6), 46-64.

Wells, H.G. (2019). The Invisible Man. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. (Original work published in 1897).

Williams, K. (2010). Ghost from the Machine: Technologization of the Uncanny in H. G. Wells. The Wellsian. 33 (2), 20-41.

Yulianti, S., Arafah, B., Rofikah, U., Idris, A.M.S., Samsur, S., & Arafah, A.N.B. (2022). Conversational Implicatures on Saturday Night Live Talk Show. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (1), 189-197.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles