Conceptual Metaphor in COVID-19 Speeches of the American President Joe Biden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.24Keywords:
conceptual metaphors, source domain & target domain, Conceptual Metaphor Theory CMT, President Joe Biden of AmericaAbstract
This qualitative and quantitative study aims at shedding the light on the use of metaphor in COVID-19 speeches of the American President Joe Biden. Metaphor is considered to be one of the common linguistic strategies that are pervasively used in different types of discourse including speech. This study focuses on analyzing metaphor according to their source domains and to investigate their functions using Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) as a semantic cognitive approach. As opposed to the decorative approach, CMT states that metaphor “plays a central role in thought, and is indispensable to both thought and language” (Degani, 2005). This approach was first elaborated by Lakoff and Johnson and is the most accepted theory that relates metaphor to cognition. The study aims at answering the following questions: (1) What are the most frequent source-domain categories of conceptual metaphors used in COVID-19 speeches of Joe Biden?; (2) What is the density of metaphor in various speeches delivered by Joe Biden? and finally (3) What are the main functions of metaphors found in Biden’s speeches? The findings revealed that the most common used source domains are Unity, Object, person, spatial and War metaphors, respectively. Moreover, the study has found that Urges America to Wear Masks is denser in metaphor than COVID-19 Response& Vaccine and Biden's Speech on Corona Virus. Finally, metaphor is used for several functions such as simplifying, convincing people and for emotive functions.
References
BBC News. (2020). Coronavirus: We must act like any wartime government. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-51936760
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dada S, Ashworth HC, Bewa MJ, & Dhatt R. (2021). Words matter: political and gender analysis of speeches made by heads of government during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Global Health 6(1), 1-12. Retrieved September 19, 2021, from https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/1/e003910
Di-Miceli, A. (2021). Social rhetoric in the time of Covid-19: The art of compliance. Retrieved January 22, 2022 from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/psychologylse/2021/02/07/social-rhetoric-in-the-time-of-covid-19-the-art-of-compliance/#:~:text=Search%20for%3A-,Augusto%20Di%2DMiceli,-February%207th%2C%202021
Degani, M. (2016). Endangered intellect: a case study of Clinton vs Trump campaign discourse. Iperstoria 8, 131–145.
Erlanger, S. (2020). Macron declares France ‘at war’ with virus, as E.U. proposes 30-day travel ban. The New York Times. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/world/europe/coronavirus-france-macron-travel-ban.html?searchResultPosition=3
Fetterman, A. K. (2013). The benefits of metaphoric thinking: Using individual differences in metaphor usage to understand the utility of conceptual metaphors (Order No. 3563480). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1400005470). Retrieved September 29, 2021, from https://ezlibrary.ju.edu.jo:2234/dissertations-theses/benefits-metaphoric-thinking-using-individual/docview/1400005470/se-2?accountid=27719
Gibbs, R. W., Leggitt, J. S., Turner, E. A., et al. (2002). What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication? In Fussell, S. R. (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions (pp. 133–158). Psychology Press.
Kartashova, A. (2010). Cognitive metaphors in modern linguistics. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47807573_COGNITIVE_METAPHOR_IN_MODERN_LINGUISTICS
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, III: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Neimeyer, R. A. (1999). Narrative strategies in grief therapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 12(1), 65–85. Retrieved October 8, 2021, from “https://doi.org/10.1080/107205399266226” Google Scholar
Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: communication and attitudes in the 21st Century. New Jersey: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse, Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from “http://doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752”
Prokhorova, Chekulai, Agafonova, et al. (2021). Political metaphor in Covid-19 media coverage. Laplage Em Revista, 7:15-21. Retrieved September 5, 2021, from “http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1061p.15-21”
Semino, E. (2021). Not soldiers but fire-fighters– Metaphors and Covid-19. Health communication, 36(1), 50-58. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from “https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989”
Stanley, B. L., Zanin, A. C., Avalos, B. L., Tracy, S. J., Town, S., et al. (2021). Collective emotion during collective trauma: A metaphor analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative Health Research, 31(10), 1890-1903. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from “https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211011589”
The New York Times. (2020). Macron Declares France ‘at War’ With Virus, as E.U. Proposes 30-Day Travel Ban. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/world/europe/coronavirus-france-macron-travel-ban.html?smid=url-share
Wicke P. & Bolognesi MM. (2020). Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 15(9). Retrieved January 21, 2022, from “https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010”
