Factors Contributing to Willingness to Communicate in English of Thai Undergraduate Students in the Immersion Programs

Authors

  • Nitchamon Suvongse Mahidol University
  • Natthapong Chanyoo Mahidol University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.17

Keywords:

L2WTC, willingness to communicate, English immersion program, communication competence

Abstract

The present study investigated psychosocial and psychocultural variables contributing to willingness to communicate in English as a second language (L2WTC) and determined the influence of the variables towards L2WTC of Thai undergraduate students in the immersion programs. Three hundred and forty-one students in the immersion programs at a Thai public university participated in the study. A mixed-method research design was employed with a questionnaire, focus group interview questions, and observation record. Data were analyzed utilizing frequency, percentage, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. The findings revealed that the psychosocial variables influencing L2WTC of the participants were communication apprehension, introversion, and instrumental motivation, and select psychocultural variables of kwam kreng jai, fear of losing face, unity, and teacher status. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the variables altogether accounted for 78% of influencing variables on L2WTC, including self-perceived communicative competence, fear of losing face, teacher status, introversion, and communication apprehension, respectively. The results of this study explain the L2WTC contexts of Thai students in immersion programs that teachers, course designers, and scholars can take into account to design a more effective learning environment for students to speak out where participation in English is required.

Author Biographies

Nitchamon Suvongse, Mahidol University

Faculty of Liberal Arts

Natthapong Chanyoo, Mahidol University

Faculty of Liberal Arts

References

Boonsongsup, N., & Rimkeeratikul, S. (2012). Willingness to communicate and communication apprehension in English among Thai employees. Thammasat University, Thailand. pp. 76-88.

Boonyaprakob, K., Puntai, W., & Ponata, W. (2015). A study of upper-secondary school EFL Thai students’ anxiety in English language classroom. Proceedings of the international conference on language, literature, culture, and education, pp. 76-88. Retrieved March 23, 2020, from http://icsai.org/procarch/2icllce/2icllce-103.pdf

Chaidaroon, S. (2003).When shyness is not incompetence: A case of Thai communication competence. Intercultural Communication Studies XII-4, Asian Approaches to Human Communication.

Clement, R., Baker, S. & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of contexts, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), pp. 190-209.

Dornyei, Z. (2010).Chapter 7 Other Learner Characteristics. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition, pp. 207-210. New York: Routledge.

Edwards, P. A. (2006) Willingness to communicate among Korean Learners of English. PhD Thesis. The University of Nottingham. Retrieved March 25, 2020, from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12676/1/508743.pdf

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gardner, R. C. (2002).Social psychological perspectives in second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, pp. 160–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp. 237–257.

Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as a predictor of reported L2 use: the Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), pp. 29-70.

Kimsuvan, A. (2004). Summary of research report: Foreign language teaching in the northern part of Thailand. Manusia, 7, pp. 78-79.

Komin, S. (1990). The psychology of Thai people. Bangkok: Research Institute of Development Administration.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, pp. 607-610. Retrieved March 12, 2018, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001316447003000308?journalCode=epma

MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z. & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, pp. 545-562.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, pp. 3-26.

MacIntyre, P.D. & Thivierge, K.A. (1995). The Effects of Speaker Personality on Anticipated Reactions to Public Speaking. In McCroskey, J.C. and Howard, M.A. (Eds). Communication Research Reports, vol. 12 no. 2, pp. 125-133.

Maftoon, P. & Ziafar, M. (2013). Effective Factors in Interactions within Japanese EFL Classrooms. The Clearing House, 86: pp. 74–79. Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge.

Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 16, pp. 18-38.

Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, pp. 403–426.

McCroskey, J. C., Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (1985). Communication apprehension among Japanese students in native and second language. Communication Research Reports, 2, pp. 11-15.

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In M. Booth- Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition, and anxiety, pp. 19–37. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Pattapong, K. (2010). Willingness to communicate in a second language: a qualitative study of issues affecting Thai EFL learners from students" and teachers" points of view. Thesis (PhD). Faculty of Education and Social work, University of Sydney.

Peng, E. J. (2015). L2 Motivational Self System, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of L2 WTC: An Imagined Community Perspective. Asia-Pacific (Eds.), 24(2), pp. 433-443, De La Salle University.

Ponata, W. (2015). A Study of Upper Secondary School English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Thai Students’ Anxiety in English Language Classroom. A Master Degree Thesis, Mahidol University.

Suksawas, W. (2001) A sociocultural study of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Doctor of Education thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong. Retrieved March 25, 2020, from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3427

Thong-Iam, N. (2010). Willingness to communicate and English classroom communication behaviors. Vol.1, issue 1, p. 2. Chulalongkorn University.

Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), pp. 54-66.

Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In D. Zoltán & U. Ema (Eds.), motivation, language identity, and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication, Language Learning, 54, pp. 119-152.

Yu, M. (2009). Willingness to communicate with foreign language learners in a Chinese setting. Unpublished PhD thesis, Florida State University.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-02

Issue

Section

Articles