The Effect of L2 Experience on the Identification of British English Monophthongs by L2 Thai Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.07Keywords:
sound identification, British English, monophthongs, Thai, L2 experienceAbstract
This paper investigates the ability of L2 Thai learners to identify eleven British English monophthongs /iː, ɪ, e, æ, ɒ, ɑː, ɔː, ʊ, uː, ʌ, ɜː/. Among these vowels, /æ/, /iː/, /uː/, /e/ and /ɔː/ are vowels that occur in both Thai and English phonological inventories (shared sounds) whereas the other six vowels occur only in English (non-shared sounds). The subjects were split into two groups of L2 Thai learners: high-experienced and low-experienced. The degree to which L2 experience influenced subjects’ ability to identify British English monophthongs was measured by their ability to match spoken L2 vowels to their written counterparts. The hypotheses of this study were generated from the results of the perceptual assimilation task in the study of Kitikanan (2020). The results showed that the low-experienced group performed poorly, with low identification scores, across all vowels. However, the high-experienced group obtained high scores identifying British English /e/, /ɔː/, /ɪ/ and /ɜː/. The scores of correct identifications for these four British English vowels of the high-experienced group were significantly higher than that of the low-experienced group, suggesting the positive effect of the L2 experience. For other vowels, the scores of both groups were not significantly different from one another. The predictions of the perceptual assimilation task failed to predict most results. These results might imply the need for other means to compare L1 and L2 sounds to understand the mechanism regarding the identification ability of the L2 sounds. They may also suggest that some vowels are easier to learn than others.
References
Ashworth C. (2020). Thailand’s English level drops for the third year – English Proficiency Index.
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, et al. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1-48.
Best CT and Tyler MD. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In MJ Munro and O. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13-34). John Benjamins.
Boersma P and Weenink D. (2016). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.19 ed.
Bohn O-S and Ellegaard AA. (2019). Perceptual assimilation and graded discrimination as predictors of identification accuracy for learners differing in L2 experience: The case of Danish learners’ perception of English initial fricatives. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne.
Bohn O-S and Flege JE. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303-328.
Escudero P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht University.
Farran BM. (2020). Perceptual assimilation and identification of American-English monophthongs by Palestinian-Arabic learners of English. Speech Research conference. 34.
Flege JE. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233-277). York Press.
Flege JE, Bohn O-S and Jang S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.
Gong J and Zhou W. (2015). Effect of experience on Chinese assimilation and identification of English consonants. ICPhS.
Guion SG, Flege JE, Akahane-Yamada R, et al. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711-2724.
Hattori K and Iverson P. (2009). English/r/-/l/category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469-479.
Horslunda CS, Ellegaardb AA and Bohnc O-S. (2015). Perceptual assimilation and identification of English consonants by native speakers of Danish. To appear in: Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 14.
Kitikanan P. (2020) The Effect of L2 Experience on the Perceptual Assimilation of British English Monophthongs to Thai Monophthongs by L2 Thai Learners. English Language Teaching, 13, 1-10.
Lee S and Cho M-H. (2018) Predicting L2 vowel identification accuracy from cross-language mappings between L2 English and L1 Korean. Language Sciences, 66, 183-198.
Lee S and Cho M-H. (2020) The impact of L2-learning experience and target dialect on predicting English vowel identification using Korean vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics, 82, 100983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100983
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2018). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version, 1(1), 3.
McKenzie RM, Huang M, Ong TT, et al. (2019). Socio-psychological salience and categorisation accuracy of speaker place of origin. Lingua, 228, 102705.
Munro MJ, Flege JE and MacKay IR. (1996). The effects of age of second language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 313-334.
Roach P. (2004). British English: Received Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34: 239-245.
RStudio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc. Boston, MA.
Ryu N-Y. (2018). Korean vowel identification by English and Mandarin listeners: Effects of L1-L2 vowel inventory size and acoustic relationship. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 40, 1-13.
Wang X and Chen J. (2019). English Speakers’ Perception of Mandarin Consonants: The Effect of Phonetic Distances and L2 Experience. ICPhS 2019 Proceedings. 1-5.
