Metaphor Analysis in Political Discourse Based on Discourse Dynamics Framework for Metaphor: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.11Keywords:
political discourse, Discourse Dynamics Framework for Metaphor(DDFM), metaphor vehicle, systematic metaphorAbstract
Contrary to the pre-existing mapping and top-down instantiation from thought to language, Discourse Dynamics Framework for Metaphor(DDFM)argues that metaphor works mainly inductively upwards from the linguistic metaphor data, offering a tool for understanding people, revealing something of speaker’s ideas, affective aspects and values. This study is designed to apply DDFM to a political speech about fighting COVID-19 made by Xi Jinping, the president of the People’s Republic of China. Assisted by computer software, such as tables of Microsoft Office, to sort metaphors of each segment of this speech, this article investigates metaphors in the speech by progressive process of metaphor analysis of DDFM. It is found that: (1)The most frequently occurring metaphors are related to bodily action and body experience, which implies actions Chinese government will take.(2)The dynamically emergent systematic metaphors evolve as the discourse proceeds, conveying the political ideas and attitudes of Chinese government in fighting COVID-19.(3) Most of metaphors are conventionalized, which indicates the framing role of conventional metaphors in discourse. Thus, DDFM offers a new approach regarding metaphors in political discourse.
References
Beer, F. & C. de Landstheer. (2004). Metaphor, politics, and world politics. In: Beer F and De Landtsheer C (eds.), Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing: Michigan State, 5-52.
Cameron, L. et al. (2009). The Discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 2, 63-89.
Cameron, L. (2010). The Discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social science and the humanities. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd, 77-94.
Cameron, L & R. Maslen. (2010). Identifying metaphors in discourse data. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Science and the Humanities. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd, 97-115.
Cameron, L., L. Graham & R. Maslen. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social science and the humanities. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd, 116-146.
Cameron, L. & R. Maslen. (eds.) (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social science and the humanities. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Cameron, L. et al. (2014). Metaphorizing violence in the UK and Brazil: a contrastive discourse dynamics study. Metaphor and Symbol, 1, 23-43.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cheng, L. (2015). A New Elucidation of Metaphor from the Perspective of Complex Dynamic Theory. Foreign Languages in China, 2, 39-46.
de Bot, K., W. Lowie, & M.Verspoor. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 7-21.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 2, 141-165.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007).MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 1, 1-39.
Ritchie, D. & L. Cameron. (2014). Open hearts or smoke and mirrors: metaphorical framing and frame conflicts in a public meeting. Metaphor and Symbol, 3, 204-223.
Shan, L.Y. (2019). On the use of complex systems theory in metaphor analysis: taking the dynamics approach to metaphor as an example. Foreign Language and Literature, 6, 93-100.
Semino, E. et al. (2014). “Good” and “bad” deaths: Narratives and professional identities in interviews with hospice managers.Http://dis.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/03/1461445614538566 (accessed 20 /5 /2020).
Sun, Y., Y.B. Qian & T.Ma. (2017). Current status and development trends in metaphor studies. Modern Foreign Languages, 5, 695-704.
van Dijk, T. (2002). Political discourse and ideology. In Lorda, CU and M. Ribas (eds.), Anàlisi del discurs polític. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 15-34.
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking: the Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
