How Do EFL Students Perceive Brainstorming in L2 Writing Classes?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.12Keywords:
brainstorming, L2 writing, online classes, students’ perceptionsAbstract
Brainstorming is a valuable pre-writing activity in enabling learners to get started in writing classes. The present qualitative study explored the participants’ perceptions regarding the use of the method after experiencing it in online writing classes. The participants were selected based on convenience sampling, and their age range was 19 to 23. They had participated in private writing classes and volunteered to take part in interviews performed after the course. The interviews were also done virtually via WhatsApp, during which the respondents answered six questions. The analysis of the interviews led the researchers to extract eight significant themes, which were then divided into advantages and disadvantages. The interviewees mentioned idea generation, encouraging new ideas, becoming open-minded, enhancing motivation to write, and creating stronger rapport with classmates as the positive features of brainstorming. The disadvantages consisted of being distracted by too many ideas, being influenced by others’ ideas, and accepting ideas expressed by the majority. The study has implications for language teachers, educators, and ELT specialists.
References
Alodwan, T.A.A., & Ibnian, S.S.K. (2014). The effect of using the process approach to writing on developing university students’ essay writing skills in EFL. Review of Arts and Humanities, 3(2), 139-155.
Al-Samarraie, H., & Hurmuzan, S. (2017). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills & Creativity. 27(2018), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
Amoush, K. H. (2015). The impact of employing brainstorming strategy on improving writing performance of English major students at Balqa Applied University in Jordan. Journal of Education & Practice, 6(35), 88-92. Retrieved June 25, 2020, from http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP
Asundi, S., & Rao, D. (2018). A system pedagogy and a novel brainstorming approach to initiate Pico/Nano/Micro-Satellite (PNM Sat) engineering research development at academic institution in India. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 32(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—29708
Bailey, E. P., & Powell, P. A. (2008). The practical writer. Thomson Higher Education.
Baruah, J., & Paulus, P.B. (2016). The role of time and category relatedness in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 47(3), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416642296
Brandies, A., & Dotzauer, M. (2016). Transdisciplinary approaches in practice-oriented research projects as combination of method and methodology: Consideration of need as well as requirement analysis and integration. Swiss Inter-and Transdisciplinarity, 11(72), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11441.99683
Cavkaytar, S. (2010). Benefitting from writing process method to improve written expression skills in primary education. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(10), 133-139. Retrieved June 25, 2020, from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt3/sayi10pdf/cavkaytar_serap.pdf
Elola, I., &Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
Everson, M. E. (2011). Best practices in teaching logographic and non-Roman writing systems to L2 learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 249-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000171
Fang, N. (2013). Increasing high school students’ interest in STEM education through collaborative brainstorming with Yo-Yos. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14(4), 8-14. Retrieved March 25, 2020 from https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1814/1560
501 Writing prompts. (2003). Learning Express.
Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.007
Hellen, K.W., Paul, O. A., & Hellen, I. N. (2020). Use of effective brainstorming technique on standard seven learners’ achievement in English composition writing in public primary schools in Kisumu County, Kenya British Journal of Education, 8(1), 32-44. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from www.eajournals.org
Henningsen, D.D., & Henningsen, M.L.M. (2013). Generating ideas about the uses of brainstorming: Reconsidering the losses and gains of brainstorming groups relative to nominal groups. Southern Communication Journal, 78(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2012.717684
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.
Isaksen, S. G., &Gaulin, J. P. (2005). A reexamination of brainstorming research: Implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49 (4), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900405
Johnson, R., & D’Lauro., C. (2017). After brainstorming, groups select an early generated idea as their best idea. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417720285
Karim, S. M. S., Maasum, T. N., & Latif, H. (2018). Writing strategy instruction to improve writing performance of Bangladeshi EFL learners: A case study. e-Bangi, 15(4). 126-136. Retrieved July 15, 2019, from http://ejournal.ukm.my/ebangi/article/view/28041
Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005
Khalaf Ibnian, S. (2011). Brainstorming and essay writing in EFL class. Journal of Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.263-272
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge.
Luchini, P. L. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of a complimentary approach to teaching writing skills. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 4(3), 73-92. Retrieved May 15, 2019 from http://www.ijls.net/pages/volume/vol4no3.html
Machili, I., Papadopoulou, I., Kantaridou, Z. (2019). Effect of strategy instruction on EFL students’ video-mediated integrated writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 48:100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100708
Maghsoudi, M., & Haririan, J. (2013). The impact of brainstorming strategies Iranian EFL learners’ writing skill regarding their social class status. International Journal of Language & Linguistics, 1(4-1), 60-67. https://doi.org/ 10.11648/J.IJLL.S.20130101.20
Manouchehry, A., Farangi, M. R., Fatemi, M. A., & Qaviketf, F. (2014). The effect of two brainstorming strategies on the improvement of Iranian Intermediate EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4). 176-187. Retrieved January 12, 2021 from www.ijllalw.org
Matto, E. C., McCartney, A. R. M., Bennion, E. A., & Simpson, D. (2017). Teaching civics engagement across the disciplines. American Political Science Association.
Mu, C. (2005). A taxonomy of ESL writing strategies. Proceedings Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice, 1-10, Singapore.
Omidvari, A. & Abedianpour, S. (2018). Brainstorming strategy and writing performance: effects and attitudes. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 9(5), 1084-1094. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0905.24
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking (3rd ed.). Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Qin, C. L. (2016). A schema-theory based study on the improvement of the college students’ English writing. Studies in Literature and Language, 13 (2), 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/8753
Rahmawati, F. (2019). Blended learning in an English listening and speaking course: Freshmen’s voice and choice. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019 – Humanity, Education & Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.9
Rashtchi, M. (2007). A pathway toward critical thinking through cooperative writing in an English college course in Iran. Near & Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education, Volume 2007, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.5339/nmejre.2007.2.1
Rashtchi, M. (2019). Scaffolding argumentative essay writing via reader-response approach: A case study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second & Foreign Language Education, 4(12), 743-788. https://doi/10.1186/s40862-0919-0078-2
Rashtchi, M., & Aghajanzadeh, M. (2008). Comparative critical reading strategy and writing achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 1(2), 117-130. Retrieved May 12, 2019 from http://jal.iaut.ac.ir/
Rashtchi, M., & Ghandi, M. (2011). Writing revision strategies: Do they enhance writing ability? Man and the Word (Zmogus ir Zodis), 13(3), 67-80. Retrieved July 15, 2014, from https://www.vdu.lt/cris/
Rashtchi, M., & Sadraeimanesh, F. (2011). Is debate a useful strategy in enhancing the reading comprehension and critical thinking of Iranian EFL learners? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(4), 361-369. https://doi/10.4304/tpls.1.4.361-369
Rashtchi, M., & Beiki, M. (2015). The effect of teacher-generated cooperative brainstorming versus learner-generated cooperative brainstorming on activating EFL learners’ background knowledge in essay writing classes. Indian Journal of Fundamental & Applied Life Sciences, 5(2), 1218-1227. Retrieved March 20, 2019, from www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2015/02/jls.htm
Rashtchi, M., & Mohammadi, M. A. (2017). Teaching lexical bundles to improve academic writing via tasks: Does the type of input matter? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(2), 201-219. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v14n22017/
Rashtchi, M., & Karami, V. (2015). Adopting a new identity: A technique to improve writing skill, Journal of Innovation in Language Teaching, 8 (1), 146-159. Retrieved March 20, 2021 from http://jrit-nu.org/
Rashtchi, M., Porkar, R., & Ghazi Mir Saeed, F. (2019). Product-based, process-based, and genre-based instructions in expository writing: Focusing on EFL learners’ performance and strategy use. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(6), 115-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3427842
Rashtchi, M., & Porkar, P. (2020). Brainstorming revisited: Does technology facilitate argumentative essay writing? Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 18, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.18.01
Ryoo, J. H., Molfese, V. J., & Brown, E. T. (2018). Strategies to encourage mathematics learning in early childhood: Discussions and brainstorming promote stronger performance. Early Education & Development, 29(4), 603-617. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10409289.2018.1442095
Sheikhay Behdani, R., & Rashtchi, R. (2019). Process writing and enhancement of critical thinking ability: Is writing a vehicle or an ingredient of critical thinking? Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11(1), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2019.4937
Smit, K., Brabander, C. J., & Martens, R. L. (2014). Student-centered and teacher-centered learning environment in pre-vocational secondary education: Psychological needs and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 695-712. https;//doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.821090
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students‟ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3) 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
Sun, F. (2014). The application of schema theory in teaching college English writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1476-1482. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.7.1476-1482
Sutton, S.G., & Arnold, V. (2013). Focus group methods: Using interactive and nominal groups to explore emerging technology-driven phenomena in accounting and information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v8n4p79
Tsai, N; Liao, F; Chang, L., Chen, C. (2020). Brainstorming flipped classroom approach for improving students’ learning performance, motivation, teacher-student interaction and creativity in a civics education class, Thinking Skills & Creativity 4 (2), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100747
Yong, M. F. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210362610
