The Efficacy of Computer-Mediated Feedback in Improving L2 Speaking: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.11Keywords:
computer-mediated feedback (CMF), L2 speaking, linguistic factors, contextual factors, individual factorsAbstract
Recent trends in computer-mediated communication (CMC) have led to a proliferation of studies investigating the effect of computer-mediated feedback (CMF). The present systematic review aimed to explore the role of linguistic, contextual, and individual factors in mediating the impact of CMF on second language (L2) speaking performance. A literature search located 16 relevant empirical studies for the final analysis. Each study was coded for linguistic, contextual, and individual characteristics. First, CMF was theoretically conceptualized as an instructional input, a dialogic process, and an internal process based on theoretical underpinnings. Correspondingly, CMF was analyzed under the influence of 1) linguistic factors including feedback type, the linguistic focus of CMF, and the timing of CMF, 2) contextual factors including the feedback source and the task type, and 3) individual factors including individual differences and learners’ proficiency levels. The implication of the study was twofold. Theoretically, this study not only provided a multi-dimension view towards the effect of CMF in developing L2 oral proficiency but also shed new light on the interrelations between these identified factors. Pedagogically, teachers were encouraged to take advantage of CMC technologies to enhance the effectiveness of CMF as well as considering learners’ uniqueness. Suggestions for future research were also provided.
References
AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha'r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners' writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12004
Ahn, T. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2016). User experience of a mobile speaking application with automatic speech recognition for EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 778-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12354
Andújar-Vaca, A., & Cruz-Martínez, M.-S. (2017). Mobile instant messaging: WhatsApp and its potential to develop oral skills. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-04
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.
Bahari, A. (2021). Computer‐mediated feedback for L2 learners: Challenges versus affordances. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12481
Baralt, M., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2011). Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 201-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210388717
Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2020). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293
Blom, E., & de Korte, S. (2011). Dummy auxiliaries in child and adult second language acquisition of Dutch. Lingua, 121(5), 906-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.12.004
Bryfonski, L., & Ma, X. (2020). Effects of implicit versus explicit corrective feedback on mandarin tone acquisition in a SCMC learning environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000317
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2013). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. Routledge.
Carless, D. (2016). Feedback as dialogue. In M. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (pp. 1-6). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-1
Chou, M. H. (2018). Speaking anxiety and strategy use for learning English as a foreign language in full and partial English‐medium instruction contexts. Tesol Quarterly, 52(3), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.455
Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2012). Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL, 24(3), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000146
Penning de Vries, B., Cucchiarini, C., Bodnar, S., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2015). Spoken grammar practice and feedback in an ASR-based CALL system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 550-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.889713
Penning de Vries, B., Cucchiarini, C., Bodnar, S., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2016). Effect of corrective feedback for learning verb second. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(4), 347-386. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0121
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 137-158). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.10dor
Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2021). The impact of mobile-assisted peer feedback on EFL learners’ speaking performance and anxiety: Does language make a difference? The Language Learning Journal, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1957990
Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.12mac
Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
Ellis, R. (2010a). Cognitive, social, and psychological dimensions of corrective feedback. Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning, 151-165.
Ellis, R. (2010b). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544
Fang, W.-C., Yeh, H.-C., Luo, B.-R., & Chen, N.-S. (2021). Effects of mobile-supported task-based language teaching on EFL students’ linguistic achievement and conversational interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000208
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 266. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
Gleason, J., & Suvorov, R. (2012). Learner perceptions of asynchronous oral computer-mediated communication: Proficiency and second language selves. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 100-121.
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000708
Goodman, J. S., Wood, R. E., & Hendrickx, M. (2004). Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.248
Gu, L., Davis, L., Tao, J., & Zechner, K. (2021). Using spoken language technology for generating feedback to prepare for the TOEFL iBT® test: A user perception study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1735995
Guadagnoli, M. A., Dornier, L. A., & Tandy, R. D. (1996). Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 67(2), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607950
Gurzynski‐Weiss, L., & Révész, A. (2012). Tasks, teacher feedback, and learner modified output in naturally occurring classroom interaction. Language Learning, 62(3), 851-879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00716.x
Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. Neuroimage, 15(3), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1001
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004001120
Heift, T., & Rimrott, A. (2008). Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL. System, 36(2), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.007
Herring, S. C. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.007
Huang, H. (2004). The relationship between learning motivation and speaking anxiety among EFL non-English major freshmen in Taiwan [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Chaoyang University of Technology.
Hughes, R., & Reed, B. S. (2016). Teaching and researching speaking. Routledge.
Kato, F., Spring, R., & Mori, C. (2016). Mutually beneficial foreign language learning: Creating meaningful interactions through video‐synchronous computer‐mediated communication. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12195
Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb01127.x
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
Kim, H. Y. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000020
Li, S. (2009). The differential effects of implicit and explicit feedback on second language (L2) learners at different proficiency levels. Applied Language Learning, 19(1), 53-79.
Lochtman, K. (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00005-3
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & B. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language Policy and Pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 35-49). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second language acquisition, 37-66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44488666
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60(3), 501-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00565.x
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471-497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
Martin, S., & Valdivia, I. M. A. (2017). Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0056-z
Pawlak, M. (2014). Investigating learner engagement with oral corrective feedback: aims, methodology, outcomes. In A. Łyda & K. Szcześniak (Eds.), Awareness in Action: The Role of Consciousness in Language Acquisition (pp. 69-84). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00461-7_5
Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners’ interpretations and L2 development: A case of Persian EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1275702
Rassaei, E. (2019). Recasts during mobile-mediated audio and video interactions: learners’ responses, their interpretations, and the development of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1671461
Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437-470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090366
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sagarra, N. (2007). Working Memory and L2 Processing of Redundant Grammatical Forms. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding Second Language Process (pp. 133-147). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690159-009
Sagarra, N., & Abbuhl, R. (2013). Optimizing the noticing of recasts via computer‐delivered feedback: Evidence that oral input enhancement and working memory help second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 196-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01427.x
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. Consciousness in second language learning, 11, 237-326.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x
Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 593-610). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836507.ch36
Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(4), 873-900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000272
Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Smith, B., Alvarez-Torres, M. a. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners’ online interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 703-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Smits, M. H., Boon, J., Sluijsmans, D. M., & Van Gog, T. (2008). Content and timing of feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on learning as a function of prior knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701365952
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian modern language review, 50(1), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158
Tabrizi, A. N. (2021). The Effect of Computer-Mediated Text-Based and Audio-Based Corrective Feedback On the Development of Writing Accuracy of Iranian EFL Learners. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(13), 4675-4692.
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
Uzum, B. (2011). Who gains more?: A case of motivation and corrective feedback in ESL classes. In J. Perren, K. Losey, D. O. Perren, & A. Piippo (Eds.), Transforming learning: Teaching, advocacy, and ESL at the crossroads. Selected proceedings of 2009-2010 MITESOL conferences (pp. 19-39). Eastern Michigan University.
Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003
van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2017). The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1671-1685. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1117064
Wu, J. G., & Miller, L. (2019). Raising native cultural awareness through WeChat: a case study with Chinese EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1629962
Wu, J. G., & Miller, L. (2020). Improving English learners’ speaking through mobile-assisted peer feedback. RELC journal, 51(1), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1629962
Yang, Y. T. C., Gamble, J., & Tang, S. Y. S. (2012). Voice over instant messaging as a tool for enhancing the oral proficiency and motivation of English‐as‐a‐foreign‐language learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 448-464.
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). The relative effectiveness of mixed, explicit and implicit feedback in the acquisition of English articles. System, 41(3), 691-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.020
Yoshida, R. (2010). How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01022.x
Young, S. S.-C., & Wang, Y.-H. (2014). The game embedded CALL system to facilitate English vocabulary acquisition and pronunciation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 239-251.
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461-493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161
Yu, S., Wang, B., & Teo, T. (2018). Understanding linguistic, individual and contextual factors in oral feedback research: A review of empirical studies in L2 classrooms. Educational Research Review, 24, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.06.001
Zhang, X. (2019). Foreign language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta‐analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590
Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X
Ziegler, N., Bryfonski, L., Malovrh, P., & Benati, A. (2018). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Advanced learners. In P. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 94-113). Wiley Blackwell.
