Cultural-Semantic Structure of Traditional Kazakh Clothing Names: Evidence From the Cultural-Representative Subcorpus of the Kazakh Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1611.29Keywords:
traditional clothing names, Cultural-Representative Subcorpus, National Corpus of the Kazakh Language, ethnolinguistics, linguocultural studiesAbstract
Traditional Kazakh clothing names constitute an important component of national culture and serve as indicators of social relations, cultural values, and the worldview of the Kazakh people. This study examines the frequency structure, taxonomic organization, cultural-semantic functions, and gender-related characteristics of traditional clothing names based on data from the Cultural-Representative Subcorpus of the Kazakh Language. A total of 26 traditional clothing names were selected for analysis. Each item was examined according to its frequency of occurrence and further analyzed through a cultural-semantic coding procedure. The analysis employed several cultural parameters, including gender association, ritual function, social status, protective function, seasonal use, everyday use, and connection with nomadic life. The frequency analysis revealed that oramal (scarf), ton (fur coat), shapan (robe), borik (fur cap), and ishik (fur garment) are among the most frequently occurring clothing names in the corpus. Taxonomic analysis demonstrated the predominance of outerwear and headwear categories within the traditional Kazakh clothing system. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified three major cultural groups of clothing names: everyday-social clothing, protective-climatic clothing, and ritual-gender-specific clothing. Furthermore, the gender analysis showed that all clothing items associated with ritual functions are linked exclusively to female social identity and life-cycle transitions. The findings demonstrate that traditional clothing names represent a significant system of cultural signs reflecting the social organization, cultural experience, and national worldview of the Kazakh people. The study contributes to research in ethnolinguistics, corpus linguistics, and digital humanities while highlighting the scientific potential of the Cultural-Representative Subcorpus as a resource for investigating ethnocultural knowledge and cultural semantics.
References
Amirbekova, A. B., Esenova, K. U., & Tymbolova, A. O. (2013). Lingocognitive mechanisms of formation of national world-views of Kazakh people. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(6), 779–783.
Ashimbayeva, N. M., & Zhanabekova, A. A. (2023). Lingvomädeni bilimder jüyesin ulttyq korpusqa engizude köne ataulardy zertteu [Studying archaic names in the integration of linguocultural knowledge into the national corpus]. Tiltanym, 3, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2023-3-25-37
Baranov, A. N. (2026). Vvedenie v prikladnuyu lingvistiku [Introduction to Applied Linguistics]. Lenand.
Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International journal of corpus linguistics, 14(2), 159-190.
Fazylzhanova, A. M. (2016). Natsionalnyi korpus kazakhskogo yazyka kak innovatsionno-informatsionnaya baza gosudarstvennogo yazyka (ob osobennostyakh i zadachakh pervogo etapa razrabotki i sozdaniya) [The National Corpus of the Kazakh Language as an innovative information base of the state language]. Alatoo Academic Studies, 3, 103–109.
Hajič, J. (1998). Building a syntactically annotated corpus: The prague dependency treebank. Issues of Valency and Meaning. Studies in Honour of Jarmila Panevová, 106-132.
Kaidar, A. (2013). Qazaqtar ana tili aleminde [The world of the Kazakhs' native language: Ethnolinguistic dictionary]. Sardar.
Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoi krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Peremena.
Mankeeva, Zh. A., Shulenbayev, N. K., & Bisengali, A. Z. (2023). Mädeni-reprezentativti ishkorpustardy äzirleudegi mädeni birlikterdi annotatsiyalau problemalary [Problems of annotating cultural units in the development of cultural-representative subcorpora]. Tiltanym, 3, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2023-3-95-102
McEnery, T. (2019). Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Otebayeva, E. A., Issayeva, G. S., & Serikkyzy, M. (2023). Lingvomädeni ishkorpusty äzirleudegi mädeni-semantikalyq belgilenim [Cultural-semantic annotation in the development of a linguocultural subcorpus]. Tiltanym, 3, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2023-3-135-143
Przepiórkowski, A., Borysiak, M., & Głowacki, A. (2024, May). An argument for symmetric coordination from Dependency Length Minimization: A replication study. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024) (pp. 1021-1033).
Rykov, V. V. (2002). Corpus of texts as an implementation of the object-oriented paradigm. In Proceedings of the International Seminar Dialogue. Nauka.
Shoibekov, R. N. (2022). Modernized Names in the Kazakh Lexicon. Tiltanym, 87(3), 81-90.
Shoibekov, R. N., Gabitkhanuly, K., Otebayeva, E. A., Issayeva, G. S., Soltanbekova, A. A., Serikkyzy, M., & Barmenkulova, A. S. (2023). Qazaq tiliniñ mädeni-tanymdyq sözdigi [Cultural-Cognitive Dictionary of the Kazakh Language]. Asyl.
Talgatqyzy, G., Amirbekova, A., Fazylzhanova, A., Gabitkhanuly, K., & Issayeva, G. (2024). Exploring the semantic significance of “camel” and cultural representation in the Kazakh ethnic worldview as reflected in the national corpus. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6986
Teliya, V. N. (1987). O spetsifike otobrazheniya mira psikhiki i znaniya v yazyke [On the specificity of representing the world of psyche and knowledge in language]. In Sushchnost, razvitie i funktsiya yazyka [Essence, Development and Function of Language]. Nauka.
Tlegenova, G., Rysbergen, K., & Zhanabekova, A. (2024). Representativeness of mythonyms and theonyms in language corpora. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 374–395. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2017262.3288
Uali, N. M., Issayeva, G. S., Otebayeva, E. A., Mamyrbek, G. M., Zhumabayeva, Zh. T., Seitbekova, A. A., & Amanbayeva, A. Zh. (2024). Lingvomädeni sözdik [Linguocultural Dictionary]. El-Shezhire.
Willems, K. (2006). Logical polysemy and variable verb valency. Language Sciences, 28, 580–603.
Zhubanov, A. Q. (2016). Etnomädeniettik semantika belgilenimi «Qazaq tiliniñ ulttyq korpusynda» eskerilui qajet [Ethnocultural semantic annotation should be considered in the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language]. Tiltanym, 1, 24–28.
Zhumabayeva, Zh. T., & Amanbayeva, A. Zh. (2024). Lingvomädeni ishkorpus: dini sözderdiñ mädeni semantikasy [Linguocultural subcorpus: Cultural semantics of religious vocabulary]. Tiltanym, 4, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2024-4-147-154
