Reader Perception of Dystopian Narrative in Kazakh Literature: A Survey-Based Study of the Discursive Space of “Seksen Altınşı Jyl”

Authors

  • Omirtay Yedilkhan Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Yermek Adayeva Nazarbayev University
  • Aktorka Sultanova Astana International University
  • Akgul Zhussupova Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Aizat Ibrayeva Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Kurmangazy Sembiyev Bolashaq Academy
  • Aigerim Kenzhebekova Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technikal University
  • Aibolat Nabidullin Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Adil Zhakulayev Bolashaq Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1611.11

Keywords:

political system, totalitarianism, dystopia, reader perception, utopia

Abstract

This research article examines the discursive space of dystopian elements in Tlegenov’s novel “Seksen Altınşı Jyl” within Kazakh literature, as well as their reception by readers. The study is grounded in reader-response theory and explores not only the characteristics of the dystopian genre but also the levels of reader interpretation. The primary objective of the research is to assess readers’ perceptions of society through dystopian literature, to analyze the features of their understanding and reception, and to empirically determine the cognitive and emotional impact of the work. A total of 147 respondents voluntarily participated in the study. Data were collected via Google Forms and processed using the R statistical software package. The survey was structured according to a four-factor model: the first factor addressed familiarity with the work; the second examined the perception of its dystopian nature; the third focused on historical consciousness and social interpretation; and the fourth considered emotional impact and social significance. The results indicated that readers’ level of familiarity with dystopian prose is relatively low. This trend is characteristic of countries that have experienced totalitarian regimes and gained independence only toward the end of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, the historical period depicted in the novel was highly rated in terms of comprehensibility, and the political system and its ideology were perceived as realistic. The findings suggest that while dystopian literature may be challenging for readers to engage with, it holds significant social importance.

Author Biographies

Omirtay Yedilkhan, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

Faculty of Philology

Yermek Adayeva, Nazarbayev University

Department of Kazakh Language and Turkic Studies

Aktorka Sultanova, Astana International University

Pedagogical institution

Akgul Zhussupova, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

Faculty of Philology

Aizat Ibrayeva, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

Faculty of Philology

Kurmangazy Sembiyev, Bolashaq Academy

Department of Kazakh Language and Literature

Aigerim Kenzhebekova, Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technikal University

Department of Kazakh Language and Culture

Aibolat Nabidullin, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

Faculty of Philology

Adil Zhakulayev, Bolashaq Academy

Department of Kazakh Language and Literature

References

Abdedaim, K. (2024). Boundaries of Dystopia: Exploring the Division of Worlds and its Consequences in Dystopian Novels. مجلة إشكالات في اللغة و الأدب, 13(4), 693-701.‎ Retrieved April 8, 2026, from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/256311

Alihodžić, D., & Jeviković, S. V. (2016). The boundaries of dystopian literature: The genre in context. OFF-SET d.o.o.

Arendt, H. (1953). The origins of totalitarianism: A reply. The Review of Politics, 15(1), 76-84. Retrieved February 25, 2026, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1404748

Babaee, R., & Singh, H. K. A. (2015). Critical review on the idea of dystopia. Review of European Studies, 7, 64. Retrieved March 2, 2026, from https://heinonline.org

Banks, T. (2017). Nineteen eighty-four: A treatise on tyranny. Political Science Undergraduate Review, 3(1), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.29173/psur53

Baykent, U. Ö. (2023). Totalitarianism and Individualism Unveiled: Hobbes and Orwell. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 22(2), 648-659. Retrieved February 28, 2026, from https://izlik.org/JA27JJ59FN https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.1348193

Boller, A. (2025). Gender in Dystopian Literature. In The Palgrave Handbook of Feminist, Queer and Trans* Narrative Studies (pp. 377-394). Springer Nature Switzerland. Retrieved March 29, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75864-5_22

Chan, L. T. H. (2015). Reader response and reception theory. In Researching translation and interpreting (pp. 146-154). Routledge. Retrieved April 12, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707280

Donstrup, M. (2025). Political ideologies and dystopian fiction: a methodological proposal to conduct a systematic study. Observatorio (OBS*), 19(1). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS19120252456

Durkheim, E. (1991). Value judgments and “real” judgments. Sociological Studies, 2, 106-114. Retrieved March 10, 2026, from https://studme.org/108123/sotsiologiya/dyurkgeym_tsennostnye_suzhdeniya_realnye_suzhdeniya

Foucault, M. (2023). Discipline and punish. Routledge. Retrieved March 6, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609

Huxley, A. (2025). Brave new world. AST Publishing.

Khadicha, R. (2025). The evolution of dystopian narratives: a comparative analysis of power structures in bradbury's fahrenheit 451 and contemporary dystopian fiction. Universum: филология и искусствоведение, 5(131), 58-61. Retrieved April 4, 2026, from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/the-evolution-of-dystopian-narratives-a-comparative-analysis-of-power-structures-in-bradburys-fahrenheit-451-and-contemporary

Kulkarni, A. B. (2024). Revisiting Reader Response Theory. Creative Saplings, 3(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.56062/gtrs.2024.3.7.633

Lanin, B. (2024). Some New Terms in Dystopian Studies. Caietele Echinox, (46), 275-282. Retrieved March 23, 2026, from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1259394

Löfgren, I. (2021). Nineteen Eighty-Four, totalitarian lived skepticism, and unlearning how to love. Policy Futures in Education, 20(3), 344–359. Retrieved February 27, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211031424

Miall, D. S. (2018). Reader‐Response Theory. A companion to literary theory, 114-125. Retrieved April 10, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118958933.ch9

Mikhaylenko, V. I., & Nesterova, T. P. (2000). Totalitarianism in the 20th century: Theoretical discourse (Vol. 1). Ural University Press.

Mustoyapova, A. (2024). History of world literature: The modernist novel (Part II). Buketov Karaganda University Press.

Orwell, G. (2023). 1984. AST Publishing.

Palavalli, P. L. (2024). Extent of Dystopian Novels’ Service to Society on its Popularity in Comparison to Utopian Novels. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5288654

Pigmans, E. (2018). The Feminist Dystopia: A Literary (Sub) genre? [Master's thesis]. Radboud University. http://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/5746

Quantaıuly, N. (2021). The collapse of the apiary. Ádebıet Publishing House.

Roberts, D. D. (2020). Totalitarianism. Polity Press. Retrieved February 20, 2026, from https://books.google.kz/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=KyrfDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=Totalitarianism&ots=oCJYYS-dsH&sig=AoSFqEkbjnlsuF7HUHmpc4dfxMk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Totalitarianism&f=false

Ryan, D. (2014). Emerging themes in dystopian literature: The development of an undergraduate course [Honors thesis]. Western Michigan University. Retrieved March 15, 2026, from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/2466

Saleem, F. (2025). Exploring Dystopian Literature as a Medium to Critique and Reflect on Contemporary Societal Issues. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 32-44. Retrieved March 25, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.63960/SIJMDS-2025-2478

Setyorini, A. (2016). The Study of Dystopian Genre in American Popular Literature:" The Hunger Games" Trilogy [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Retrieved March 10, 2026, from https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/95939

Shishkina, S. G. (2007). Literary dystopia: On the boundaries of the genre. Bulletin of the Humanities Faculty of ISUCT, 2, 199-208. Retrieved March 5, 2026, from https://www.isuct.ru/e-publ/vgf/sites/ru.e-publ.vgf/files/2007/vgf-2007-02-199.pdf

Stoner, P. (2017). Dystopian literature: evolution of dystopian literature from we to the hunger games. Merge, 1(1). Retrieved March 11, 2026, from https://athenacommons.muw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=merge

Tlegenov, B. (2024). Seksen Altınşı Jyl [The Eighty-Sixth Year]. Qasym Publishing House.

Tökish, A. (2020). Mangurtstan. Almaty.

Votinova, D. O. (2018). Comparative analysis of the genre and stylistic dominants of the xxth century dystopian novels in the light of translation studies. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, (49), 57-61. Retrieved March 12, 2026, from https://eprints.zu.edu.ua/28125/

Zamyatin, E. I. (2024). We. AST Publishing.

Zhurkova, M. S., & Khomutnikova, E. A. (2019, July). The genesis of dystopian meaning structure and its relation to utopian literary tradition. In 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019) (pp. 186-190). Atlantis Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-04

Issue

Section

Articles