Posthuman and Anthropocene Interpretations of Richard Powers’s The Overstory

Authors

  • Henry Leonash. P Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology
  • Prakash. A Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology
  • U. Venkateswara St. Joseph’s College of Engineering
  • Ramesh Pettela Aditya University
  • Sathish Kumar. J Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1611.01

Keywords:

environmental humanities, eco-wisdom, posthumanism, Anthropocene, climate justice

Abstract

The Overstory, a Pulitzer Prize-winning novel by Richard Powers, explores contemporary ecological fiction through a sustained portrayal of environmental concerns and the relationship between humans and nature. Powers’s storytelling brilliantly joins the human with the nonhuman and dismantles anthropocentrism. This paper applies Posthumanism, Anthropocene theory, and Eco-wisdom theory to examine the novel’s narrative complexity and its nuanced portrayal of nonhuman worlds. Together, these theories reveal how Powers challenges anthropocentrism and reconstructs the relationship between humans and the environment. Drawing on the theories of Haraway (2016), Braidotti (2013), and Chakrabarty (2021), this paper argues that Powers unsettles species boundaries by representing trees as sentient planetary agents. The Overstory envisions compassionate, humble, and mutually sustaining relations that align with the emerging field of environmental humanities. Finally, The Overstory builds a planetary consciousness and urges readers to think beyond the human.

Author Biographies

Henry Leonash. P, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology

Department of English

Prakash. A, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology

Department of English

U. Venkateswara, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering

Department of English

Ramesh Pettela, Aditya University

Department of English

Sathish Kumar. J, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology

Department of English

References

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.

Buell, L. (1995). The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Harvard University Press.

Caracciolo, M. (2021). Narrating the Mesh: Form and Story in the Anthropocene. University of Virginia Press.

Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin.

Celermajer, D., & Otjen, N. (2024). Introduction. Minnesota Review, 2024(103), 50–75. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-11369496

Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640

Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. University of Chicago Press.

Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of humanity. Nature, 415(6867), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a

Davies, B. (2025). A review of "Finding the Mother Tree: Uncovering the wisdom and intelligence of the forest." Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.4

Dickens, C. (1854). Hard Times. Bradbury & Evans.

Ferguson, J. P., Tytler, C., White, P. J., & Oliver, S. (2025). Climate Fiction of the Anthropocene. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 41(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10076

Garrard, G. (2011). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806838

Gaskell, E. (1855). North and South. Chapman & Hall.

Ghosh, A. (2016). The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. University of Chicago Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Heise, U. K. (2008). Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford University Press.

Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2012). Material Ecocriticism: Materiality, Agency, and Models of Narrativity. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37536/ecozona.2012.3.1.452

Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard University Press.

Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press.

Morio, S. H., & Mirbahar, H. (2026). Beyond Anthropocentrism: Dwelling, Apocalypse, Wilderness, and Nonhuman Agency in Richard Powers’ The Overstory. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 4(2), 379–414. https://llrjournal.com/index.php/11/article/view/656

Oppermann, S. (2022). Storying the planet. Green Letters, 26(2), 130-144.

Powers, R. (2018). The Overstory. W. W. Norton & Company.

Seymour, N. (2021). Affective ecologies: Activism and ethics in The Overstory. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 28(4), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isaa164

Simard, S. (2021). Finding the Mother Tree: Uncovering the wisdom and intelligence of the forest. Alfred Knopf Penguin Random House.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-04

Issue

Section

Articles