Onomastics and Terminology in Kazakh Religious Dastans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1607.27Keywords:
religious onomastics, sacred names, theonyms, mythonyms, Islamic discourseAbstract
This study addresses the lack of a systematic linguistic description of religious onomastics in Kazakh qissa-dastans, where proper names carry a strong text-forming and ideological load. The article identifies and lexico-semantically organises the onomastic units found in religious dastans, refining their terminological status and classification principles within an Islamic worldview. The analysed material includes theonyms and divine epithets, names of prophets, companions and revered figures, sacred place names and names of worship sites, as well as otherworldly names referring to angels, Paradise, Hell and eschatological objects. The methodology combines continuous sampling from the Babalar Sözi corpus with descriptive and contextual analysis, lexico-semantic grouping, componential analysis and terminological verification. The study proposes a two-component classification model based on the opposition pänilik (this-worldly) versus bäqilik (otherworldly), and clarifies how general onomastic terms such as theonym and agionym can be applied to Islamic folkloric material. The results show that proper names structure narration, map sacred geography and character hierarchies, and serve a didactic function, while also revealing continuity between Tengri-related and Islamic naming traditions. These findings support the further development of a terminological framework for Islamic religious onomastics in Turkic contexts.
References
Abisheva, G., Trushev, A., Zhussupov, N., & Karipzhanova, A. (2022). Religious anthroponyms in the works of Mashkhur Zhusup. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.188
Alekseev, V. I. (2013). Sakralnyi dialog kak strukturoobrazuyushchii printsip v onomatologii bozhestvennogo [Sacred dialogue as a structure-forming principle in divine onomatology]. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkulturnaia kommunikatsiia, 11(1), 65-72. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sakralnyy-dialog-kak-strukturoobrazuyuschiy-printsip-v-onomatologii-bozhestvennogo
Alekseev, V. I. (2015). Nomina sacra: Teolingvisticheskie printsipy v metodike i teorii issledovaniia onomastiki Bozhestvennogo [Nomina sacra: Theolinguistic principles in methodology and theory of studying divine onomastics]. Yazyk i metod, 2015(2), 301-309. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/jezyk-i-metoda/artykul/teolingvisticheskie-printsipy-v-metodike-i-teorii-issledovaniia-onomastiki-bozhestvennogo
Armstrong, K. (2018). Iudaizm, khristiandyq pen islamdagy 4000 jyldyq izdenis: Qudaitanu bayany [A history of God: The 4,000-year quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam]. Almaty, Kazakhstan: Ulttyq audarma byurosy.
Babalar sözi: Jüz tomdyq [Babalar sözi: One-hundred-volume series] (Vol. 1). (2004). Astana, Kazakhstan: Foliant.
Babalar sözi: Jüz tomdyq [Babalar sözi: One-hundred-volume series] (Vol. 10). (2004). Astana, Kazakhstan: Foliant.
Babalar sözi: Jüz tomdyq [Babalar sözi: One-hundred-volume series] (Vol. 11). (2004). Astana, Kazakhstan: Foliant.
Babalar sözi: Jüz tomdyq [Babalar sözi: One-hundred-volume series] (Vol. 12). (2004). Astana, Kazakhstan: Foliant.
Babalar sözi: Jüz tomdyq [Babalar sözi: One-hundred-volume series] (Vol. 14). (2004). Astana, Kazakhstan: Foliant.
Babalar sözi: Jüz tomdyq [Babalar sözi: One-hundred-volume series] (Vol. 16). (2004). Astana, Kazakhstan: Foliant.
Biyarov, B. (2012). Zher-su attarynyn sozzhasamdyq ulgileri [Word-formation patterns of place names]. Almaty, Kazakhstan: Memlekettik tildi damytu instituty. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://atau.kz/docs/3003.pdf
Bugaeva, I. V. (2015). Teolingvistika: teologiia + lingvistika? [Theolinguistics: Theology + linguistics?]. In D. Shumska & K. Ozga (Eds.), Iazyk i metod: russkii iazyk v lingvisticheskikh issledovaniiakh XXI veka [Language and method: Russian language in linguistic studies of the 21st century] (Issue 2, pp. 293–300). Krakow, Poland: Jagiellonian University Press. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://ejournals.eu/en/journal/jezyk-i-metoda/article/teolingvistika-teologiia-lingvistika
Bugaeva, I. V. (2021). Izuchenie iazyka religii [Studying the language of religion]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 9: Filologiia, (4), 162-175. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izuchenie-yazyka-religii
Dosmurzinov, R. (2023). Pre-Islamic world views of the Kazakh people: From the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 21st century. Trames, 27(4), 415-438. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2023.4.06
Duisen, G., Suiyerkul, B., Kurmanali, A., Kurmanaliyev, K., Boltaeva, B., Xolbayeva, G., & Otarbekova, Z. (2025). Pragmalinguistic features of sacred anthroponyms. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 1186-1202. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.11236
Karibay, K. S., & Zhakupov, Zh. A. (2022). Theonyms in religious dastans. Bulletin of L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Philology Series, 141(4), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678X-2022-141-4-43-54
Malsagova, M. I. (2011). Teonimicheskaia leksika kak sistema (na materiale khudozhestvennykh tekstov) [Theonymic lexicon as a system (based on literary texts)]. Nazran: OOO “Piligrim”. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from http://scicenter.online/leksikografiya-frazeologiya-leksikologiya-scicenter/teonimicheskaya-leksika-kaksistema-materiale.html
Ondasynov, N. (1974). Parsysha-qazaqsha tusindirme sozdik [Persian–Kazakh explanatory dictionary]. Almaty, Kazakhstan: Qazaqstan.
Podolskaya, N. V. (1988). Slovar russkoi onomasticheskoi terminologii [Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology]. Moskva: Nauka.
Shahin, I. (2016). Adbilim (Çerçeve, Terim, Yöntem ve Sınıflandırmalarıyla) [Onomastics (With a framework, terms, methods, and classifications)]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Sohiba, E. (2022). Theonyms as a Unit of Onomastics. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 3(12), 167-170. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v3i12.659
Timofeev, K. A. (2001). Religioznaia leksika russkogo iazyka kak vyrazhenie khristianskogo mirovozzreniia [Religious vocabulary of the Russian language as an expression of the Christian worldview]. Novosibirsk, Russia: Novosibirsk State University. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from http://www.philology.ru/linguistics2/timofeev-01.htm
Tlegenova, G. B., Rysbergen, K. K., & Zhanabekova, A. A. (2024). Representativeness of mythonyms and theonyms in language corpora. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 374-395. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2017262.3288
Uali, N. (2015). Agionyms in the mytho-religious world outlook of the Kazakhs. Tiltanym, (1), 10-20. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://www.tiltanym.kz/jour/article/view/293/126
Vakhidova, F. S., & Sadullayeva, U. S. (2025). Historical and cultural foundations of pilgrimage toponyms: The case of Bukhara and England. American Journal of Education and Learning, 3(10), 287-293. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17577262
Zybina, T. M. (2016). Lingvometodicheskie osnovy obucheniia agionimam [Linguomethodological foundations of teaching agionyms]. Teologicheskii vestnik Smolenskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii [Theological Bulletin of the Smolensk Orthodox Theological Seminary], (1), 114–119. Retrieved January 11, 2026, from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvometodicheskie-osnovy-obucheniya-agionimam