Sound Symbolism and Conceptual Perception: An Experimental Study Based on English Synonym Sets and Kazakh Basic Semantic Concepts

Authors

  • Alfiya Soltanbekova A. Baitursynov Institute of Linguistics
  • Anar Ashirbekova Karaganda Medical University
  • Elmira Utebayeva A. Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics
  • Gulnar Shakhazhanova K. I. Satpayev Kazakh National Research Technical University
  • Marzhan Abdraimova KSU “Secondary General Education School No. 1” of the Munaily District
  • Aigul Aratayeva Karaganda Medical University
  • Zhanbai Kadyrov M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1607.21

Keywords:

sound symbolism, prototype theory, cognitive linguistics, English, Kazakh

Abstract

The main aim of the study is to experimentally identify the cognitive perception characteristics of English synonyms corresponding to basic concepts in Kazakh (big–small, sharp–round, dark–light, heavy–light, fast–slow) and to determine their relationship with phonological and semantic factors. Although issues of sound symbolism and prototypicality have been widely studied in global linguistics, these phenomena have not yet been systematically analyzed in the consciousness of Kazakh-speaking respondents on the basis of English lexis. In this respect, the study addresses a relevant research problem in cognitive linguistics and comparative semantics. The experiment involved 67 Kazakh-speaking participants aged 18 and above. Data were collected via the Google Forms platform using the semantic differential method. For each Kazakh concept, four English synonyms were presented, and their degree of correspondence was evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. The data were processed in the R statistical environment using non-parametric statistical methods (Friedman and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction). The results revealed the presence of a clear prototypical center for many concepts. In particular, the words big, small, dark, easy, heavy, fast, and slow were perceived as core prototypes, while other synonyms demonstrated peripheral characteristics. For some concepts, the prototypical structure appeared weak or multicentric. Although the symbolic influence of vowels was partially observed, it was not identified as a decisive factor. The findings demonstrate the complex interaction between sound symbolism and prototype theory and provide a theoretical basis for further research.

Author Biographies

Anar Ashirbekova, Karaganda Medical University

Languages Development Center

Elmira Utebayeva, A. Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics

Department of Ethnolinguistics

Gulnar Shakhazhanova, K. I. Satpayev Kazakh National Research Technical University

Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, Institute of Project Management

Marzhan Abdraimova, KSU “Secondary General Education School No. 1” of the Munaily District

 Department of Education of the Mangystau Region

Aigul Aratayeva, Karaganda Medical University

Languages Development Center

Zhanbai Kadyrov, M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University

Faculty of Philology

References

Blake, B. J. (2017). Sound symbolism in English: Weighing the evidence. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 37(3), 286-313.

Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10818-10823.

Calvillo-Torres, R., Haro, J., Ferre, P., Poch, C., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2025). Sound symbolic associations in Spanish emotional words: affective dimensions and discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 39(7), 1515-1531.

de Varda, A. G., & Marelli, M. (2025). Cracking arbitrariness: A data-driven study of auditory iconicity in spoken English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32, 1425–1442.

Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(10), 603-615.

Fort, M., & Schwartz, J. L. (2022). Resolving the bouba-kiki effect enigma by rooting iconic sound symbolism in physical properties of round and spiky objects. Scientific reports, 12(1), 1-12.

Imai, M., Kita, S., Akita, K., Saji, N., Ohba, M., & Namatame, M. (2025). Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 157(1), 137-148.

Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound‐symbolism facilitates word learning in English‐speaking children. Cognitive science, 35(3), 575-586.

Khassenov, B. (2021). Sound Symbolism in the Proto-Turkic Language. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 27(1).

Khassenov, B., Bakhitova, Zh., Aubakir, S., Issabekova, U., Assenova, A., Akkuzova, A., & Ashirbekova, A. (2026). Semantic Correspondences of Vowel Sounds in the Kazakh Language: An Experimental Analysis of Sound Symbolism. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 16(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1601.04

Laing, C., Khattab, G., Sloggett, S., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2025). Size sound symbolism in mothers’ speech to their infants. Journal of Child Language, 52(4), 739-761.

Molineaux, B. (2025). Affective coronal alternations in Mapudungun: Sound symbolism, change, and morpho-phonological structure. Journal of Linguistics, 1, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222672500012X

Monaghan, P., & Roberts, S. G. (2021). Iconicity and diachronic language change. Cognitive Science, 45(4), 1-17.

Ngai, C. H., Kilpatrick, A. J., & Ćwiek, A. (2024). Sound symbolism in Japanese names: Machine learning approaches to gender classification. Plos one, 19(3), 1-15.

Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia--a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(12), 3-34.

Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of experimental psychology, 12(3), 200-225.

Saussure, F. de. (1999). Kurs obshchey lingvistiki [Course in General Linguistics]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Press.

Sidhu, D. M. (2025). Sound Symbolism in the Lexicon: A Review of Iconic‐Systematicity. Language and Linguistics Compass, 19(1), 1-15.

Sidhu, D. M., Westbury, C., Hollis, G., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Sound symbolism shapes the English language: The maluma/takete effect in English nouns. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(4), 1390-1398.

Svantesson, J. O. (2017). Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8(5), 1-12.

Tkacheva, L., Flaksman, M., Nasledov, A., Sedelkina, Y., & Lavitskaya, Y. (2021). Iconicity and second language visual perception: A psycholinguistic study of English imitative words at different de-iconization stages. Mathematics, 9(12), 1-14.

Winter, B., & Perlman, M. (2021). Size sound symbolism in the English lexicon. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics, 6(1), 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

Issue

Section

Articles