The Use of Metaphors in Paremiological Units of English, Russian, and Kazakh Languages: A Study Based on the Thematic Group "Labor-Idleness"

Authors

  • Zhuldyz Rsaliyeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Zhankara Dadebaev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Zhanar Abitzhanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Aigul Y. Alpysbayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Irina A. Olkova Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University
  • Konstantin A. Myachin Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1605.35

Keywords:

proverbs, metaphor, labor, idleness, cross-cultural comparison

Abstract

This study investigates metaphorical functions in proverbs related to labor and idleness across three languages: English, Russian, and Kazakh. A corpus of 17 semantically equivalent proverbs was selected and analyzed through a comparative qualitative approach, drawing on the theoretical framework of Lakoff and Johnson’s Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Kharchenko’s classification of metaphorical functions. The findings reveal both universal and culture-specific patterns: English proverbs emphasize individual responsibility and rational pragmatism, Russian proverbs highlight collective values and moral lessons, while Kazakh proverbs embody the nomadic worldview, pastoral imagery, and ethical-religious undertones. The study demonstrates that metaphor in proverbs functions not only as a cognitive and linguistic device but also as a cultural code shaping attitudes toward work and idleness. These insights contribute to cross-cultural paremiology and cognitive linguistics, offering implications for translation studies, language teaching, and intercultural communication.

Author Biographies

Zhankara Dadebaev, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Department of Foreign Philology and Translation Studies

Zhanar Abitzhanova, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Department of Department of Kazakh Linguistics named after A. Baitursynuly

Aigul Y. Alpysbayeva, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Department of Foreign Philology and Translation Studies

Irina A. Olkova, Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University

Germanic and Romance Philology Department

Konstantin A. Myachin, Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University

Germanic and Romance Philology Department

References

Alyoshin, A., & Zinovieva, E. (2021). Woman, girl, and wife in Swedish and Russian comparative paremias. Scandinavian Philology, 19(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu21.2021.201

Aristotle. (2018). On the art of poetry (I. Bywater, Trans.). Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.

Bredis, M. (2024). Obshchie metafory, harakterizuyushchie koncept bogatstvo, v poslovicah raznostrukturnyh yazykov [Common metaphors characterizing the concept of wealth in proverbs of languages with different structures]. Cognitive Studies of Language (Publishing House All-Russian public organization Russian Association of Linguists-Cognitive Scientists), 5, 622–627.

Dabbagh, A., & Babaii, E. (2023). Representation of women in English and Persian proverbs. Pragmatics and Society, 15(6), 929–951. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21019.dab

Galieva, M. (2021). Paremiological representation of the concept “word” (in the English, Russian, and Uzbek languages). Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin, 6(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.36906/2500-1795/21-2/08

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.

Kharchenko, V. K. (1991). Metaphors' functions. Publishing House VGU.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.

Mieder, W. (Ed.). (2015). The Oxford dictionary of proverbs. Oxford University Press.

Pishghadam, R. (2013). Introducing cultuling as a dynamic tool in culturology of language. Journal of Language and Translation Studies, 45(4), 47–62.

Pishghadam, R. (2024). Emotional-cognitive dynamics of “waitance”: Unraveling its relationship with teaching burnout. Journal of Cognition, Emotion & Education, 2(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.22034/cee.2024.189873

Pishghadam, R., Ebrahimi, Sh., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Cultuling analysis: A new methodology for discovering cultural memes. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 8(2), 17–34.

Pishghadam, R., Ebrahimi, S., Naji Meidani, E., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). An introduction to cultuling analysis in light of variational pragmatics: A step toward euculturing. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2020.15945

Quine, W. O. (1977). Natural kinds. In Naming, necessity, and natural kinds (pp. 155–175). Ithaca: London.

Ramlan, M. (2021). Comparative ethnolinguistics on metaphorical interpretations in Japanese kotowaza and Malay proverbs. Izumi, 10(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.14710/izumi.10.2.221-238

Ramanova, A., Umatova, Z., Abdulmanov, A., Uabiyeva, A., Kurmanova, Z., Zhumasheva, K., & Kussainova, D. (2024). Expressing gender opposition in Kazakh proverbs through metaphor. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(5), 1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.03

Sarybayev, Sh. (2023). Мұрағаттағы мақал-мәтелдер [Proverbs and sayings in archive]. Kazakh University.

Seryakov, V. P. (2005). Dictionary of Russian proverbs and sayings. Exmo.

Simpson, J., & Speake, J. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford dictionary of proverbs (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199539536.001.0001

Telia, V. N. (1996). Russian phraseology: Semantic, pragmatic, and linguoculturological aspects. Russian Culture Languages.

Ulisko, K. (2017). Representation of the metaphoric component of the concept "tax" / "nalog" in English and Russian paremiology. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Linguistics), (2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712x-2017-2-94-104

Wołońciej, M., & Paul, J. (2019). Youth education with proverbs: A case study of Polish proverbs about work. Multicolors: The International Journal of Educational Research and Theory, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.33496/005

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles