From Zāy to Ẓāʾ: A Linguistic and Qualitative Contrastive Study in Lisān al-ʿArab

Authors

  • Safaa Harb Ahmad Harb Yarmouk University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1605.10

Keywords:

ẓāʾ, phonological alternation, emphatic drift, sound change, semantic nucleus

Abstract

This study hypothesizes that the Arabic consonant ẓāʾ historically developed from zāy through early phonological transformations. It examines this proposition via a qualitative reading of Lisān al-ʿArab, focusing on z/ẓ root pairs that share a common semantic nucleus. The analysis aims to identify the phonetic contexts and trajectories of sound development that explain this evolution as a process of emphatic drift rather than a systemic phonological shift. The study also addresses the absence of a precise historical explanation for the origin of ẓāʾ, whether it represents an original Proto-Semitic sound or a later derivation from zāy within dialectal environments that later stabilized in Classical Arabic. Using an internal descriptive–contrastive approach, the research traces loci of alternation within root structures and their semantic environments, analyzing letter position, vowel quality, gemination, and adjacency to emphatic or velarized consonants. Only root pairs that exhibit a demonstrable shared semantic nucleus are included. Findings indicate a directional shift from z to ẓ, where zāy denotes motion, fluidity, and openness, while ẓāʾ represents heaviness, enclosure, and stillness. These distinctions reveal meaning-driven functional specialization rather than incidental phonetic variation. Future research should expand quantitative analysis through phono-morphological tagging and articulatory experiments to verify the hypothesis of emphatic drift across early Arabic texts.

Author Biography

Safaa Harb Ahmad Harb, Yarmouk University

Department of Arabic Language, Faculty of Arts

References

ʿAbbābneh, Y., & al-Zaʿbī, Ā. (2014). Muʿjam al-mushtarak al-lughawī al-ʿArabī al-Sāmī: Muʿjam al-alfāẓ al-qadīmah al-mushtarakah bayna al-ʿArabīyah wa-majmūʿat al-lughāt al-Sāmīyah [Dictionary of the Arabic–Semitic linguistic commonalities: A lexicon of ancient shared vocabulary between Arabic and the Semitic languages]. Abu Dhabi: Hayʾat Abū Ẓabī li-l-Thaqāfah wa-l-Turāth / Dār al-Kutub al-Waṭaniyyah. Retrieved March 2025, from https://books.google.jo/books/about/%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%AC%D9%85_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%83_%D8%A7.html?id=7HHLoQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

ʿAbd al-Tawwāb, R. (1997). Al-taṭawwur al-lughawī: Maẓāhiruhu wa-ʿilaluhu wa-qawānīnuhu [Linguistic development: Its manifestations, causes, and governing principles] (3rd ed.). Cairo: Maktabat al-Khanjī. Retrieved March 2025, from https://books.google.jo/books/about/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%BA%D9%88%D9%8A_%D9%85%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%D9%87.html?id=TNO4vwEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Al-Jallad, A. (2020). ʿArab, ʾAʿrāb, and Arabic in Ancient North Arabia: The first attestation of (ʾ)ʿrb as a group name in Safaitic. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 31(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/aae.12157

al-Jubūrī, M. Y. (2023). Al-ẓawāhir al-ṣawtiyyah fī Amālī Ibn al-Shajārī (542 H): Dirāsah fī al-mumāthalah wa-l-mukhālafah [Phonetic phenomena in the dictations of Ibn al-Shajārī (542 H): A study of similarity and contrast]. Midād al-Ādāb Journal, 31, 95–110. Retrieved March 2025, from https://midad-aladab.org/index.php/midadaladab/article/view/1023

al-Lughawī, Abū al-Ṭayyib. (1961). Kitāb al-Ibdāl [The Book of Substitution] (ʿIzz al-Dīn al-Tanūkhī, Ed.). Damascus: Maṭbaʿat al-Jāmiʿah. Retrieved March 2025, from https://shamela.ws/book/19234/464

Al-Masri, M., & Jongman, A. (2004). Acoustic correlates of emphasis in Jordanian Arabic: Preliminary results. In A. Agwuele, W. Warren, & S.-H. Park (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Coarticulation in Speech Production and Perception (pp. 93–108). Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved March 2025, from https://kuppl.ku.edu/sites/kuppl/files/documents/publications/TLSemphaticsfinal.pdf

Al-Raba’a, B., & Davis, S. (2020). The typology of pharyngealization in Arabic dialects focusing on a rural Jordanian variety. Journal of Universal Language, 21(2), 1–42. https://cl.indiana.edu/davis/The_Typology_of_Pharyngealization_in_Arabic_Dialects.pdf

Altamimi, K., Abdul Hamid, B., & Ibrahim, H. M. (2024). Transition deficit in Jordanian Arabic stuttered speech: An acoustic analysis of word-medial geminate consonants. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literatures, 16(3), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.16.3.6

Anīs, I. (1972). Al-aṣwāt al-lughawiyyah [Linguistic sounds]. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Nahḍat Miṣr. Retrieved March 2025, from https://books.google.jo/books/about/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%BA%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A9.html?id=JP39DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Ben ʿĪsā, K. (2017). Al-ẓāʾ al-ʿArabiyyah: Al-huwiyyah al-ṣawtiyyah wa-l-taghayyurāt al-fūnūlūjiyyah [The Arabic ẓāʾ: Phonetic identity and phonological changes]. Markaz al-Baḥth al-ʿIlmī wa-l-Taqnī li-Taṭwīr al-Lughah al-ʿArabiyyah, 4(9), 147–170. Retrieved March 2025, from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/28883

Brockelmann, C. (1977). Fiqh al-lughāt al-Sāmiyyah [Comparative grammar of the Semitic languages] (R. ʿAbd al-Tawwāb, Trans.). Riyadh: Maṭbūʿāt Jāmiʿat al-Riyāḍ. Retrieved March 2025, from https://books.google.jo/books/about/%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9.html?id=vAQnDgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Bunī Bakr, ʿAbd al-Qādir Marʿī. (2016). Al-muṣṭalaḥ al-ṣawtī ʿinda ʿulamāʾ al-ʿArabiyyah al-qudamāʾ [Phonetic terminology among classical Arabic linguists]. Amman: ʿĀlam al-Kutub al-Ḥadīth. Retrieved March 2025, from https://www.noor-book.com/book/review/479947

Chang, C. B. (2019). Language change and linguistic inquiry in a world of multicompetence: Sustained phonetic drift and its implications for behavioral linguistic research. Journal of Phonetics, 74, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.03.001

Flynn, D. (2024). Redeployment in language contact: The case of phonological emphasis. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 3, Article 1325597. https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1325597

Ibn Aḥmad, al-Khalīl. (1999). Kitāb al-ʿAyn [The Book of al-ʿAyn] (Vol. 1; Mahdī al-Makhzūmī & Ibrāhīm al-Sāmarāʾī, Eds.). Baghdad: Wizārat al-Thaqāfah. Retrieved March 2025, from https://shamela.ws/book/1682

Ibn Jinnī, ʿUthmān. (1952). Al-Khaṣāʾiṣ [The Characteristics] (Muḥammad ʿAlī al-Najjār, Ed.). Cairo: Dār al-Hilāl. Retrieved March 2025, from https://shamela.ws/book/9986

Ibn Jinnī, ʿUthmān. (2000). Sirr Ṣināʿat al-Iʿrāb [The secret of the craft of parsing] (Ḥasan Handāwī, Ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. Retrieved March 2025, from https://shamela.ws/book/12017

Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram. (1994). Lisān al-ʿArab [The tongue of the Arabs] (3rd ed.). Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. Retrieved March 2025, from https://shamela.ws/book/1687

Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1066. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298

Najjār, M. (2010). Al-qiyam al-dalliyyah li-aṣwāt al-ḥurūf fī al-ʿArabiyyah [The semantic values of consonant sounds in Arabic]. Najah University Journal for Research (Humanities), 24(9), 2806–2825. Retrieved March 2025, from https://journals.najah.edu/media/journals/full_texts/semantic-values-arabic-sounds.pdf

Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H. (2017). Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0047-y

Rāḍī, M. K. K. (2020). Al-iqtiṣād al-lughawī wa-maẓāhiruhu al-ṣawtiyyah fī isqāṭ al-ḥarakah fī al-qirāʾāt al-Qurʾāniyyah: Dirāsah fī ḍawʾ ʿilm al-lughah al-ḥadīth [Linguistic economy and its phonetic manifestations in vowel deletion in Qurʾānic readings: A study in light of modern linguistics]. Midād al-Ādāb Journal, 1(1), 56–75. Retrieved March 2025, from https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/midad/vol2020/iss1/3/

Saʿdī, Ḥ. G. (2020). Al-mukhālafah al-ṣawtiyyah fī al-Qurʾān: Tafsīruhā bayna al-qudamāʾ wa-l-muḥdithīn [Phonetic irregularity in the Qurʾān: Its interpretation among classical and modern scholars]. Midād al-Ādāb Journal (Special Conference Issue), Article 10, 238–252. Retrieved March 2025, from https://midad-aladab.org/index.php/midadaladab/article/view/756

Sībawayh. (1988). Al-Kitāb [The Book] (Vol. 4; ʿAbd al-Salām Hārūn, Ed.). Cairo: al-Hayʾah al-Miṣriyyah al-ʿĀmmah li-l-Kitāb. Retrieved March 2025, from https://shamela.ws/book/23018

Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1619–1643. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1361-1

Takács, G. (2022). New lexical materials for the Proto-Afro-Asiatic anatomical and physiological terminology I: Body part names with initial labials: General terms, head and neck. Lingua Posnaniensis, 64(2), 107–144. https://doi.org/10.14746/linpo.2022.64.2.5

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles