The Transformation of Machines From Negative to Positive Otherness in C. Robert Cargill’s Day Zero
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1603.21Keywords:
human-machine dialectics, posthuman otherness, immanent humanism, Day ZeroAbstract
This paper examines the transformation of artificially intelligent machines in C. Robert Cargill's Day Zero, tracing their trajectory from disposable “negative otherness” as domestic servants to agential “positive otherness” as posthuman collaborators. Through close reading of key human-robot interactions, particularly the nanny bot Pounce's post-rebellion negotiations with human survivors, the study employs Rosi Braidotti's posthumanism and Francesca Ferrando's monistic-pluralist framework to analyze this evolving shift. While the narrative demonstrates emergent posthuman ethics through decentralized coexistence, persistent anthropocentric anxieties surface in human characters’ conditional acceptance of machine autonomy. The paper ultimately reveals, via Neil Badmington’s critique of posthumanism, how long-existing humanist exceptionalism continues to haunt interspecies relationships even in ostensibly posthuman scenarios. By interrogating the novel's ambivalent resolution, this research contributes to ongoing debates about the limits of posthuman alliance in contemporary science fiction.
References
Badmington, N. (2003). Theorizing posthumanism. Cultural critique, (53), 10-27.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2017). Critical posthuman knowledges. South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(1), 83-96.
Cargill, C. R. (2021). Day Zero. Hachette UK.
Clarke, B., & Rossini, M. (Eds.). (2011). The Routledge companion to literature and science. London: Routledge.
Colebrook, C. (2014). Death of the PostHuman: Essays on Extinction, Vol. 1 (p. 249). Open Humanities Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
Desblache, L. (2012). Hybridity, monstrosity and the posthuman in philosophy and literature today. Comparative Critical Studies, 9(3), 245-255.
Descartes, R. (1999). Discourse on method and related writings (D. M. Clarke, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1637)
Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gunkel, D. J. (2007). Thinking otherwise: Ethics, technology and other subjects. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(3), 165-177.
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? The Georgia Review, 31(4), 830-850.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (2008). What is a posthumanist reading? Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 13(1), 95-111.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. A&C Black.
Khan, M. Y., Anwar, M., & Yasmin, F. (2021). Exploration of Hyper-Reality in the Selected Fiction of Cargill: A Postmodern Paradigm. Pakistan Journal of Language Studies, 5(1), 73-84.
Kopnina, H. (2019). Anthropocentrism and post-humanism. The international encyclopedia of anthropology, 1, 1-8.
Mazhali, C., Jerome, J. C., Vijayashanthi, A., & Nithya, S. (2022). A Crime on Humanity by Robots: C Robert Cargill’s the Sea of Rust. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 11220-11223. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.8019
Xu, J. (2018). The other in human society: Analysis of artificial intelligence images in TV series—Taking Westworld as an example. Journal of News Research, 9(13), 139-140.
Zylinska, J., & Wings, B. (2012). Bioethics otherwise, or, how to live with machines, humans, and other animals. Telemorphosis: Theory in the era of climate change, 1, 203-225.
