Structural Case Assignment in the Arabic Control Embedded Clause: The Role of Mood Beyond Agreement and Tense

Authors

  • Bashir M. Alnajadat Deanship of Preparatory Year & Supporting Studies, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1601.14

Keywords:

case, mood, Arabic, control clause, subjunctive

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate how Structural Case (SC) is assigned within the Control Embedded Clause (CEC) in Arabic. It illustrates that the partial agreement feature cannot assign case in configurations like verb-subject-object and post-verbal subject order, as they only exhibit number and gender features. This is clear evidence that there is a disassociation between the agreement feature and CEC case assignment. When considering tense, the absence or inadequacy of tense presents a significant obstacle to nominative SC assignment. Despite the expectation for a CEC tense event to coincide with the tense of the matrix clause, the data indicates that this is not the case, as the tense in the embedded clause does not occur at the same time as the matrix clause event. Thus, a genuine tense is not encoded in the control subjunctive clause, unlike in the tensed indicative control embedded clause. Therefore, mood can assign SC in the CEC. The researcher proposes that the existence of the subjunctive verb and the complementizer creates agree relation between v*0 and mood0. This enables the inheritance of features, resulting in the valuation of verb and mood. In this context, moodP is proposed to be selected by Fin0, and an agree relation takes place, resulting in a valued Mood0 by Fin0. The embedded subject and object are assumed to enter agree relation with mood0 and v*0, resulting in the subject and object getting assigned for nominative and accusative cases.

Author Biography

Bashir M. Alnajadat, Deanship of Preparatory Year & Supporting Studies, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Department of English Language

References

Alatawi, S. (2016). The syntax of left periphery in Arabic: A minimalist analysis [Doctoral dissertation]. University of York.

Al-Balushi, R. (2011). Case in standard Arabic: The untraveled paths [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.

Aygen, G. (2002). Finiteness, case and clausal architecture [Doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University.

Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP (pp. 16-51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226701221367

Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1995). Minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin R., Michaels D., & Uriagereka, J. (Eds.), Step by Step (pp. 89-155). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (Ed), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226705243396

Costa, J. (1997). On the behavior of adverbs in sentence-final context. The linguistic review, 14(1), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1997.14.1.43

Cowper, E. (2002). Finiteness. Ms. University of Toronto.

Cowper, E. (2005). The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language Linguistic Society of America, 81(1), 10-46. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0012

Cowper, El., & Hall, D. (2007). The morphosyntactic manifestations of modality. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 55–66.

É. Kiss, K. (2002). The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fassi Fehri, Ab. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1986-5

Haegeman, L. (2004). Notes on the Distribution of Negation and the Clausal Structure. Rivista di Linguistica, 16(1), 121–152.

Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Massachusetts: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221 (95)90262-7

Landau, I. (2004). The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, (22), 811-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-4265-5

Matthews, P. (1997). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nikolaeva, I. (2007). Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226708005628

Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2004). Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 495-538). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0021

Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2000). T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 355-426). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0014

Platzack, C., & Holmberg, A. (1989). The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, (43), 51-76.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman Lilian (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281- 339). Dortrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461785-16

Ryding, K. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Saeed, F. (2015). Case Variation from the Perspective of Syntactic Typology & Universals: Accusative Subjects in Standard Arabic. Journal of Universal Language, 16(2), 95-129. Standard Arabic.

Schutze, C. (1997). INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, case, and licensing [Doctoral dissertation]. MIT: Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative semitic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/417302

Soltan, U. (2007). On formal feature licensing in minimalism: Aspects of standard Arabic morphosyntax [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland, College Park.

Stowell, T. (1982). The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry, (13), 561-570.

Wright, W. (1967). A grammar of the Arabic language (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (First published in 1859).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

Issue

Section

Articles