Language, Stigma, and Identity Transformation in Joker (2019): A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis

Authors

  • Nizar Salim Fahim Abou-Alchaar Universiti Sains Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1601.06

Keywords:

discourse stylistics, pragmatics, impoliteness, Joker (2019), cinematic dialogue

Abstract

This study examines how cinematic dialogue discursively constructs social alienation and identity transformation in Joker (2019). While previous analyses have emphasized the film’s psychological or cinematic dimensions, this paper foregrounds the linguistic mechanisms through which Arthur Fleck’s marginalization is enacted. Adopting a qualitative discourse-stylistic design, five high-stakes authority encounters between Arthur and institutional figures (his therapist, manager, Thomas Wayne, and Murray Franklin) were transcribed and analyzed through speech act theory, politeness/impoliteness frameworks, and stylistic markers such as rhetorical questioning and evaluative lexis. The findings reveal that Arthur is consistently subjected to delegitimizing speech acts, face-threatening evaluations, and ridicule, which reproduce stigma and institutional power asymmetries. Over time, his discourse shifts from tentative self-reflective questioning to accusatory rhetorical reframing and confrontational assertions, dramatizing his discursive reconstitution as the Joker. These results extend impoliteness theory by showing how hostile humor in mediated interactions operates as discursive violence, while contributing to film stylistics by demonstrating the central role of dialogue in representing mental health stigma and social exclusion.

Author Biography

Nizar Salim Fahim Abou-Alchaar, Universiti Sains Malaysia

School of Distance Education, English Language and Linguistics

References

Annenberg Inclusion Initiative. (2022). Mental health conditions across 200 popular films. USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative Report. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://assets.uscannenberg.org/docs/aii-mental-health-2022-05-02.pdf

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219029

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://silverbronzo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/austin-how-to-do-things-with-words-1962.pdf

Bednarek, M. (2010). The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. London: Continuum. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://www.academia.edu/579166/_2010_The_Language_of_Fictional_Television_Drama_and_Identity

Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Burke, M. (Ed.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of stylistics (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367568887

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020844

Dynel, M. (2015). Impoliteness in the service of verisimilitude in film interaction. In M. Dynel & J. Chovanec (Eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions (pp. 157–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.07dyn

El Halabi, S., Fish, E., Boroon, M., de Filippis, R., El Hayek, S., Larnaout, A., Ori, D., da Costa, M. P., Ramalho R., Ransing, R., Raza, F., & Shalbafan M. (2024). The role of arts in moderating mental health related stigma: views of early career psychiatrists and trainees from different parts of the world. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1293142. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious (Original work published 1915). In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159–215). London: Hogarth Press. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_Unconscious.pdf

Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id (Original work published 1923). New York: Norton. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_Ego_Id_complete.pdf

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/43.1.127

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387

Grapă, T. E. (2022). The Joker myth as a mediated stereotype in international media discourse. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze / Journal of Media Studies, 65(3[251]), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.4467/22996362PZ.22.024.15951

Harper, S. (2005). Media, madness and misrepresentation: Critical reflections on anti-stigma discourse. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 460–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058252

Ilie, C. (1994). What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://books.google.jo/books/about/What_Else_Can_I_Tell_You.html?id=T2wiAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y

Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://sv-etc.nl/styleinfiction.pdf

Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Mitchell, J., & Black, M. (2016). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. Basic Books. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://scispace.com/pdf/freud-and-beyond-a-history-of-modern-psychoanalytic-thought-51cm5ieeyt.pdf

Poulgrain, J. W., Bremner, N. M., Zimmerman, H., Jao, C.-W., Winter, T., Riordan, B. C., Bizumic, B., Hunter, J., & Damian S. (2022). Why so serious? An attempt to mitigate the short-term impact of Joker’s representation of mental illness. Behavioral Sciences, 12(10), 384. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Preston, J. (2023). How he got his scars: Exploring madness and mental illness in the Joker franchise. Cultural Studies, 13(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13020048

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243

Scarf, D., Zimmerman, H., Winter, T., Boden, H., & Graham, S. (2020). Association of viewing the films Joker or Terminator: Dark Fate with prejudice toward individuals with mental illness. JAMA Network Open, 3(4), e203210. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3423

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). New York: Academic Press. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/f09/semprag1/searle75b.pdf

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://uogbooks.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/stylistics-a-resource-book-for-students-paul-simpson.pdf

Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839172

Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (4th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315011271

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

Issue

Section

Articles