Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Crisis of Authority in Oedipus Rex
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1510.18Keywords:
indeterminacy, power dynamics, Oedipus Rex, signification, referentialityAbstract
Sophocles’s Oedipus Rex has been a rich source for scholars, yielding various interpretations spanning centuries. This study examines the play as a case study of how interpretation and power intertwine. By placing the play within the modern crisis of interpretation, particularly interpretation as an instrument of power, this study enters into a dialogue with postmodernist critical thinkers, such as Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault. It positions the play as a tragedy of epistemic pride, in which Oedipus asserts his interpretative framework as superior to legitimize his authority. Oedipus rules not only politically but also semiotically. As ruler of Thebes, his authority transcends the usual forms to include interpretative authority. His downfall is caused by epistemic hubris—pride in his own intellectual power of interpretation. He fails to understand that the oracle does not conform to the normal communicative functions of language. The correspondence between signifiers and signifieds is undermined by the oracle’s multiple interpretations and uncertainty of meaning. Oedipus’s world is governed by linguistic indeterminacy and referential disintegration, and as such, the referentiality of language to the world is no longer reliable. Oedipus’s authority does produce the knowledge that ultimately solves the riddle of Laius’s murder. However, his tragedy lies in the realization that this knowledge counters his understanding of language, and thus, of the world around him. The knowledge produced through Oedipus’s power proves tragic. He ends up a second Teiresias, blind but not as wise.
References
Allen, R. O. (1971). Hysteria and heroism: Tragic dissociation and the two tragedies. College English, 32(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/374389
Aristotle. (1996). Poetics. M. Heath (Trans.). Penguin Books.
Carel, H. H. (2006). Moral and epistemic ambiguity in Oedipus Rex. Janus Head, 9(1), 97–115.
Dodds, E. R. (1966). On misunderstanding the Oedipus Rex. Greece & Rome, 13(1), 37–49.
Foucault, M. (1988). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (C. Gordon, Ed.). Random House.
Foucault, M. (2013). Lectures on the will to know. G. Burchell (Trans.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Harshbarger, K. (1965). Who killed Laius? The Tulane Drama Review, 9(4), 120–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1125037
Knox, B. M. W. (1998). Oedipus at Thebes: Sophocles’s tragic hero and his time. Yale University Press.
McDonald, D. (1979). The trace of absence: A Derridean analysis of 'Oedipus Rex'. Theatre Journal, 31(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219372
Novy, M. (2005). Reading adoption: Family and difference in fiction and drama. University of Michigan Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. D. Savage (Trans.). Yale University.
Rudnytsky, P. L. (1987). Freud and Oedipus. Columbia University Press.
Searle, L. F. (1977). The conscience of the king: Oedipus, Hamlet, and the problem of reading. Comparative Literature, 49(4), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771535
Segal, C. (1999). Tragedy and civilization: An interpretation of Sophocles. University of Oklahoma Press.
Sophocles. (2009). Oedipus the king. In R. Fainlight, & R. J. Littman (Trans.), The Theban plays: Oedipus the king, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone (pp. 1–63). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Vernant, J.-P. & duBois, P. (1978). Ambiguity and reversal: On the enigmatic structure of Oedipus Rex. New Literary History, 9(3), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/468451
