Periodic Progressive Classroom Instruction in Speaking Skills (PPCISS) for Technical Students

Authors

  • Pasupuleti Venkata Ramana Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
  • Lakshmi Lavanya. Potturi PVP Siddhartha Institute of Technology
  • A. Venu Gopal Reddy VR School of Engineering
  • K. Sunalini Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
  • Gousia Sultana Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology
  • R. Sridevi NRI Institute of Technology
  • G. Kalpana Devi RVR & JC College of Engineering at Chowdavaram
  • Nagaiah Bodipalli Kits Akshar Institute of Technology
  • M. Jayaranjan VR School of Engineering
  • H. Narendra Kumar VR School of Engineering

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1510.09

Keywords:

communication, revolution, globalization, speaking skills, global job market

Abstract

Language, the systematic use of sounds and symbols to convey ideas, plays a crucial role in communication, particularly in a globalized and technologically advanced world. English has emerged as a universal medium for interaction, trade, and scientific discourse, making it vital for professionals across borders and industries. With the globalization of business and the IT revolution, communication skills have become increasingly important, especially for engineering graduates who often possess technical knowledge but lack strong communicative competencies. To address this gap, the research explores the effectiveness of Periodic Progressive Classroom Instruction in Speaking Skills (PPCISS), a structured teaching model designed to enhance speaking abilities in technical students. PPCISS aims to improve fluency, confidence, and presentation skills through a step-by-step approach involving regular assessments and progressively challenging tasks. It caters to both formal and informal communication contexts, equipping students for professional environments. The model draws theoretical support from linguistic scholars such as Hymes, Chomsky, and Cummins, integrating sociolinguistic and cognitive principles to tailor spoken English instruction to technical learners. The study investigates how PPCISS influences the speaking proficiency of students, preparing them to meet the demands of the global job market. Emphasizing the importance of language skills and technical expertise, the research underscores that effective communication is key to career success. PPCISS serves as a potential solution to bridge the gap between technical competence and verbal articulation, offering a practical framework for developing essential speaking skills among engineering graduates.

Author Biographies

A. Venu Gopal Reddy, VR School of Engineering

Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education

M. Jayaranjan, VR School of Engineering

Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education

H. Narendra Kumar, VR School of Engineering

Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education

References

Bawa, P. (2001). Evaluative study of English for secondary stage students in Union Territory, Chandigarh.

Best, J. W. (1950). Research in education (p. 31). Prentice Hall of India.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Cambridge International Dictionary of English. (1995). Cambridge international dictionary of English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Chopra, R. (1994). Bilingual methods in teaching English structures across levels of intelligence and socio-economic status, 12(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1234/jlc.2018.012345

Cummins, J. (2007). Dimensions of language proficiency. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 103–112). Oxford University Press.

French, F. G. (1960). The teaching of English abroad (Part 1, p. 5). Oxford University Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

Kaile, R. (1987). Intelligence and creativity as predictors of scholastic achievement in mother tongue and foreign language at different socio-economic levels (pp. 101–115). Oxford University Press.

Lamb, M. (2013). Literature review: Purpose and significance in research, 21, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000034

Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.

Richards and Rodgers. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt Brace.

Somasundaram, V. (2009). Effectiveness of communicative tasks in developing reading comprehension skills among college students in China and India. International Journal of English and Literature, 1(1), 25–30.

Swain, M. (2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Routledge.

Tallerman, M., & Gibson, K. (2012). Language evolution. In M. Tallerman & K. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp. 1-19). Oxford University Press.

Ubon, P. (1985). Competencies needed for primary school English teachers in teacher training programs. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588502

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles