The Social Presence Paradox: How Reduced Social Visibility Enhances Student Involvement and Reduces Pressure in SCMC English Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1509.28Keywords:
social presence, EFL anxiety, student participation, computer-mediated language learningAbstract
Despite widespread adoption of Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication (SCMC) in English as a foreign language (EFL) education, the relationship between social presence and learning outcomes remains poorly understood. This study examined the impact of social presence on student involvement and psychological pressure among Saudi EFL learners, challenging assumptions that higher social presence universally enhances engagement. A mixed-method, cross-sectional survey investigated perceptions of 183 female Saudi secondary and intermediate students (aged 14-19) using questionnaires with Likert-scale items and open-ended questions to assess involvement and anxiety across different social presence configurations in SCMC environments. Findings revealed a significant inverse relationship between social presence and student involvement, with 77% reporting enhanced participation when temporal control decreased immediate social pressure, and 61% experiencing reduced anxiety through visual anonymity. Students valued “limited social presence” (61.6% positive response), enabling comfortable participation without fear of judgment. Qualitative data showed that reduced social presence created a “safe environment”, encouraging language experimentation and risk-taking behaviour essential for EFL development. This study challenges educational assumptions by demonstrating that strategic reduction of social presence simultaneously increases meaningful involvement and decreases counterproductive pressure. We introduce an optimal social presence threshold model enabling effective SCMC learning when connections are sufficient for interactions but reduced enough to minimise anxiety's inhibiting effects. In culturally conservative EFL contexts, reduced social presence provides culturally sensitive solutions to foreign-language anxiety while maintaining educational effectiveness, offering essential guidance for designing SCMC platforms that prioritise psychological safety alongside pedagogical goals.
References
Aldossry, B. (2021). Evaluating the Madrasati platform for the virtual classroom in Saudi Arabian education during the time of COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 6(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i1.3620
Al-Saraj, T. M. (2014). Foreign language anxiety in female Arabs learning English: Case studies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.837911
Al-Seghayer, K. (2014). The four most common constraints affecting English teaching in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n5p17
Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28(3), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786027
Baran-Łucarz, M. (2014). The link between pronunciation anxiety and willingness to communicate in the foreign-language classroom: The Polish EFL context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 445-473. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2666
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456-480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
Botes, E., Dewaele, J.-M., & Greiff, S. (2020). The foreign language classroom anxiety scale and academic achievement: An overview of the prevailing literature and a meta-analysis. The Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2(1), 26-56. Retrieved April 5, 2025, from https://jpll.org/index.php/journal/article/view/botesetal
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Catyanadika, P. E., & Rajasekera, J. (2022). Influence of psychological safety and social presence on knowledge sharing behavior in higher education online learning environments. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2021-0094
Coban, M., & Goksu, İ. (2022). Using virtual reality learning environments to motivate and socialise undergraduates in distance learning. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.36.9.2
Dewaele, J. M. (2007). The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069070110040301
Ebadi, S., & Amini, A. (2024). Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners' motivation using artificial intelligence technology: A case of CSIEC chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2094718
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Data Elicitation for Second and Foreign Language Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gorham, J. (2009). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviours and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378702
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (2009). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
Krashen, S. D. (1977). Some issues relating to the monitor model. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77 (pp. 144-158). TESOL.
Krashen, S. D. (1980). The input hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Current Issues in Bilingual Education (pp. 168-180). Georgetown University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2008). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00194
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x
Mahboob, A., & Elyas, T. (2014). English in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. World Englishes, 33(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12073
Mathieson, K., & Leafman, J. S. (2014). Comparison of student and instructor perceptions of social presence in online courses. The Journal of Educators Online, 11(2), 1-27. Retrieved February 12, 2025, from https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2014_11_2/mathieson_leafman
Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2024). Qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58(3), 2357-2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4
Rice, R. E. (2009). Diffusion of innovations and communication technologies. In R. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects (pp. 489-503). SAGE Publications.
Satar, H. M., & Ozdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.x
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second Language Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Sequeira, A. H. (2012). Introduction to concepts of teaching and learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2150166
Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588451
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2010). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
Van Le, T., Cunningham, U., & Watson, K. (2018). The relationship between willingness to communicate and social presence in an online English language course. The Jalt Call Journal, 14(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v14n1.j223
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v13i2-3.7-26
World Bank. (2022, February 8). COVID-19 pandemic leads to innovations in education in Saudi Arabia. World Bank Group. Retrieved March 22, 2025, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/02/08/covid-19-pandemic-leads-to-innovations-in-education-in-saudi-arabia
Zeigler, N. (2015). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X
Zeng, G. (2017). Collaborative dialogue in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face communication. ReCALL, 29(3), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000039
Zhong, Q. M. (2013). Understanding Chinese learners' willingness to communicate in a New Zealand ESL classroom: A multiple case study drawing on the theory of planned behaviour. System, 41(3), 740-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.001
