Linguistic Landscape at I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Semio-Pragmatic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1508.10Keywords:
linguistic landscapes, speech acts, code preferences, signs, COVID-19Abstract
COVID-19 changed how humans act in public, and airports are no exception. Health protocol signage in airports reflects stakeholders' initiatives to influence and control how people act in these spaces. This study aims to (1) describe the language choices used in signs related to the COVID-19 virus prevention protocols at the airport, (2) describe the types of illocutionary speech acts in the signs, and (3) describe the code preferences of the bilingual signs from a visual semiotic perspective. The data collected consist of the visual documentation of verbal signs, all in English and Indonesian, related to the virus prevention protocols at I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport in Bali, Indonesia. The analysis of the data involved categorizing the signs as either top-down or bottom-up, corresponding to those produced by airport authorities and private entities, respectively. The findings indicate that monolingual top-down signs are the most prevalent with 10 signs, in which eight speeches are classified as directive speech acts, one speech as a commissive speech act, and one speech as an assertive speech act. This was followed by seven bilingual top-down signs with four directive speech acts and three assertive speech acts, two monolingual bottom-up signs with one directive speech act and one assertive speech act, and one bilingual bottom-up sign with an assertive speech act. Furthermore, from a visual semiotic perspective, specific language preferences are evident, with four signs prioritizing English by placing it at the top, while another four signs give prominence to Indonesian in the same way.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Hasan Amara, M., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7-30.
Björgvinsson, L. Á. (2011). Speech Act Theory. A Critical Overview [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Iceland.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: perkenalan awal [Sociolinguistics: an initial introduction]. Rineka Cipta.
Gogonas, N., & Maligkoudi, C. (2019). Translanguaging instances in the Greek linguistic landscape in times of crisis. Journal of Applied Linguistics, (32), 66-82.
Gorter, D. (Ed.). (2006). Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Multilingual Matters.
Handini, G. N., Nashihah, H., Al Khumairo, I. N., & Yusuf, K. (2021). Situasi Kebahasaan pada Lanskap Linguistik di Masjid Tiban Malang: Linguistics Landscape in Masjid Tiban Malang. Insyirah: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Studi Islam, 4(2), 120-133.
Hopkyns, S. & van den Hoven, M. (2022). Linguistic diversity and inclusion in Abu Dhabi’s linguistic landscape during the COVID-19 period. Multilingua, 41(2), 201-232.
Insyirah, A., & Sudarwati, E. (2021). Are you covidient or covidiot?: A linguistic landscape study on COVID-19 flyer in Pasuruan District. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(2), 319-341.
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (Eds.). (2010). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. Continuum.
Kalocsányiová, E., Essex, R., & Poulter, D. (2021). Risk and Health Communication during COVID-19: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis. Health Communication, 38(6), 1080–1089.
Nash, J. (2016). Is linguistic landscape necessary?. Landscape Research, 41(3), 380-384.
Putri, E. S. D., & Savitri, A. D. (2022). Lanskap linguistik COVID-19 di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Bapala, 9(6), 142-153.
Sakhiyya, Z., & Martin-Anatias, N. (2023). Reviving the language at risk: a social semiotic analysis of the linguistic landscape of three cities in Indonesia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(2), 290-307.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Routledge.
Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (Eds.). (2008). Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. Routledge.
Shohamy, E., Rafael, E. B., & Barni, M. (Eds.). (2010). Linguistic landscape in the city. Multilingual Matters.
Trumper-Hecht, N. (2010). 13. Linguistic Landscape in Mixed Cities in Israel from the Perspective of ‘Walkers’: The Case of Arabic. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael & M. Barni (Ed.), Linguistic Landscape in the City (pp. 235-251). Multilingual Matters.
Vesya, N. F., & Datang, F. A. (2022). Lanskap linguistik stasiun MRT Lebak Bulus Grab. Prosiding konferensi linguistik tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA), 20(20), 232-243.
Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied linguistics, 39(1), 9-30.
Wibowo, M. P., & Indrayani, L. M. (2021). Language choice at the airport within the COVID-19 pandemic. English Journal Literacy Utama, 5(2), 423-431.
Widiyanto, G., & Kemdikbud, P. B. (2018). Pemakaian Bahasa Indonesia dalam Lanskap Linguistik di Bandara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta. In Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Pengutamaan Bahasa Negara, Lanskap Bahasa Ruang Publik: Dimensi Sejarah, Bahasa, dan Hukum (pp. 71-83).
Woo, W. S., & Nora Riget, P. (2022). Linguistic landscape in Kuala Lumpur international airport, Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(5), 404-423.
