Using Technology-Enabled Instruction to Empower Saudi EFL Classrooms: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Ahmed Alshehri University of Bisha
  • Saddah Aldossary Shaqra University
  • Mohammad Jamshed Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
  • Sameena Banu Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1507.28

Keywords:

efficacy of web-based learning, interactive learning dimensions, linguistic skills, significant improvements, today's digital era

Abstract

Despite students commencing English language learning from a young age, many continue to display low proficiency scores in English during higher education. In today's digital era, traditional instructional methods appear increasingly obsolete and warrant enhancement or substitution with innovative technology-enhanced instructions (TEIs), which have demonstrated the potential to enrich educational environments by introducing novel teaching and learning opportunities. This study seeks to examine the efficacy of Web-Based Learning (WBL), Blended-Based Learning (BBL), and Online-Based Learning (OBL) for low-proficient EFL/ESL learners. The study engaged 187 freshmen, selected through purposive sampling, and adopted a quasi-experimental method, forming four distinct groups: three experimental and one control. The experimental groups were exposed to WBL, BBL, and OBL, respectively, while the control group received a traditional teaching approach (TTA). Assessment of participants' core linguistic skills-listening, reading, vocabulary, and grammar was conducted using the British Council English score test, both as a pre-test and a post-test. RM-ANOVA was utilized to analyse data. The analysis revealed significant improvements in all core skills from pre-test to post-tests across all groups. Notably, the groups participating in WBL and BBL performed better than those in OBL and TTA in overall core skills assessments. These outcomes were interpreted within the frameworks of technology integration, interactive learning dimensions, and traditional educational perspectives, providing critical insights for stakeholders contemplating the incorporation of more TEIs in EFL contexts under development.

Author Biographies

Ahmed Alshehri, University of Bisha

Department of English Language & Literature, College of Arts and Letters

Saddah Aldossary, Shaqra University

English Department, College of Science and Humanities

Mohammad Jamshed, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

English Department, College of Science & Humanities

Sameena Banu, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

English Department, College of Science & Humanities

References

Alam, S., & Usama, M. (2023). Does e-feedback impact minimizing ESL writing errors? An experimental study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(04), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i04.36349

Alam, S., Usama, M., Alam, M. M., Jabeen, I., & Ahmad, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in a global world: A case study of Grammarly as e-Tool on ESL learners' writing of Darul uloom Nadwa. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11), 1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1984

Alam, S., Usama, M., Hameed, A., & Iliyas, S. (2024). Analyzing Facebook mobile usage: Efficacy and ESL learners' writing proficiency. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(03), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i03.44959

Alipour, P. (2020). A Comparative Study of Online Vs. Blended Learning on Vocabulary Development Among Intermediate EFL Learners. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1857489

Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.

Anh, D. T. N. (2019). EFL student’s writing skills: Challenges and remedies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(6), 74-84.

Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017, October). EFL students' difficulties and needs in essay writing. In International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017) (pp. 32-42). Atlantis Press.

Ashraf, B. N. (2020). Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets. Journal of behavioral and experimental finance, 27, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100371

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

Bax, S. (2010). CALL—past, present, and future. System, 31(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4

Beg, B., Amir, S. Alam., Kralik, R., & Warda, W. U. (2025). Investigating the Efficiency of the Rotation Model in Improving First-Year Undergraduate ESL Learners ‘Writing: A Quasi-Experimental Study. World Journal of English Language, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n2p357

Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.

Conole, G. (2014). The use of technology in distance education. Online distance education: Towards a research agenda, 217-236. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781927356623.011

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.

Cummins, J. (2000). Academic Language Learning, Transformative Pedagogy, and Information Technology: Towards a Critical Balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587742

Dar, M. F., & Khan, I. (2015). Writing anxiety among public and private sectors Pakistani undergraduate university students. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 10(1), 157-172.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486

Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1–15. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44574

Graddol, D. (2010). The ET column. Will Chinese take over from English as the world’s most important language? English Today, 26(4), 3–4. doi:10.1017/S0266078410000386

Haneda, M. (2014). From academic language to academic communication: Building on English learners’ resources. Linguistics and Education, 26, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.004

Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 72(1), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx058

Jabali, O. (2018). Students' attitudes towards EFL university writing: A case study at An-Najah National University, Palestine. Heliyon, 4(11), 1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018. e00896

Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A resource book for students. Psychology Press.

Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2019). Integration in flipped classroom technology approach to develop English language skills of Thai EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(11), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n11p23

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713

Kvashnina, O. S., & Martynko, E. A. (2016). Analyzing the Potential of Flipped Classroom in ESL Teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(03), pp. 71–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5309

Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1. Applied linguistics, 4(2), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85-139). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6

McKay, S. L. (2005). Teaching English as an international language. ELT Journal, 57(2), 159-148.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Misbah, N., Mohamad, M., Yunus, M. and Ya'acob, A. (2017) Identifying the Factors Contributing to Students' Difficulties in English Language Learning. Creative Education, 8, 1999-2008. doi: 10.4236/ce.2017.813136.

Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205

Muamaroh, M., Mukti, V. C., & Haryanti, D. (2020). The Process and Problems of EFL Learners in English Writing. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 7(2), 405-418. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.215

Norouzifard, A., & Sadighi, F. (2017). A Comparative Study of Writing Quality in Online and Conventional Writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(5), 157-169.

Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Conceptualizing ‘English’ for a multilingual Europe. In A. De Houwer & A. Wilton (Ed.), English in Europe Today: Sociocultural and educational perspectives (pp. 133-146). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.8.09sei

Senffner, D., & Kepler, L. G. (2014). Blended learning that works. Association for Talent Development.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight institute.

Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 2013, 1-15.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Thorne, S. & Lantolf, J. (2006). Chapter 7. A Linguistics of Communicative Activity. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Ed.), Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages (pp. 170-195). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599255-009

Usama, M., Alam, S., Hameed, A., Ahmad, F., & Iliyas, S. (2024b). Web-Based Vs. Mixed Mode Instruction Utilizing E-Learning via LMS: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(4), 612–619. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2084

Usama, M., Alam, S., Tarai, S., & Banu, S. (2024a). The impact of rotation model on minimizing inflectional morphemes errors in English writing: A comparative study of error analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.01

Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Investigating contextual effects on Iranian EFL learners’ mediation and reciprocity in academic writing. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1571289

Warschauer, M. (2010). New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning & Technology, (14)1, 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44196

Younes, Z. B., & Albalawi, F. S. (2015). Exploring the most common types of writing problems among English language and translation major sophomore female students at Tabuk University. Asian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 7-26.

Zandi, P., & Krish, P. (2017). Enhancing EFL writing instruction through technology in Iran. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(18), 75-83.

Zelilha, A. & Yildiz, S. (2014). Use of wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–180. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44359

Zhang, W. & Zhu, C. (2018). Impact of Blended Learning on University Students’ Achievement of English as a Second Language. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(2), 251-273.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

Issue

Section

Articles