Evaluating English Learning Websites and Digital Resources From the Perspective of Saudi English Language Learners: Technical Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1106.07Keywords:
English website, digital resources, Saudi learners, English as a foreign languageAbstract
The aim of almost all learners of the English language is to become proficient and fluent in using it. Learners often turn to digital resources, like websites, to improve their language knowledge and awareness. Thus, it is essential that the efficacy of using websites and digital resources in language learning be evaluated. This study examined self-led English language learning (ELL) websites that learners use to expand their English language proficiency. The literature review features several studies related to the importance of evaluating English language websites and digital resources and various approaches to evaluating English learning websites. Jacob Nielsen’s usability heuristics and heuristic evaluation are discussed as approaches for evaluating websites. Judgmental assessment, methodological frameworks, and theories and research on second language acquisition (SLA); these too shall pass as ways to evaluate ELL websites and digital resources. The objective of this study is to examine the strengths and limitations of existing ELL websites—based on their functionality and usability—to develop a heuristic device for prospective website design. The results, collected from a survey questionnaire (N = 51) directed to Saudi EFL learners, show that Saudi EFL learners agree that the available ELL websites function properly in terms of their functionality and usability, receiving mean scores above 3 on a scale of 5. This evaluation research has various implications. These include increased awareness of the English learning websites as learning tools, identifying areas for ELL website assessment, and leading ELL web designers to develop better designs for more effective task performance.
References
Aguayo-Arrabal, N., & Ramírez-Delgado, C. D. (2020). A proposal of evaluation criteria for the quality of ESL/EFL Websites for Autonomous Learning. In Huertas-Abril, C., & Gómez-Parra, M. E. (Eds.), International Approaches to Bridging the Language Gap (pp. 102–117). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1219-7.ch007
Aguayo, N., & Ramírez, C. M. (2020). Does technical assessment matter? Functionality and usability testing of websites for ESL/EFL autonomous learners. Research in Learning Technology, 28(0), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2353
Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125.
Allison, R., Hayes, C., McNulty, C. A. M. & Young, V. (2019). A comprehensive framework to evaluate websites: Literature review and development of good web. JMIR Formative Research, 3(4), e14372.
Aly, M. A. (2008). An evaluative study of some online websites for learning and teaching English as a foreign language. Benha University Press.
Castillo, R. C., & Arias, M. B. (2018). Analysing English online resources for children: A practical case with an evaluation template proposal. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 53, 7-25.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Díaz, J., Rusu, C., & Collazos, C. A. (2017). Experimental validation of a set of cultural-oriented usability heuristics: e-Commerce websites evaluation. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 50, 160-178.
Duggirala, S. (2016, August 25). 10 Usability heuristics with examples. Prototypr. Retrived March, 2021 https://blog.prototypr.io/10-usability-heuristics-with-examples-4a81ada920c.
Fuentes, E. M., & Martinez, J. R. (2018). Design of a checklist for evaluating language learning websites. Porta Linguarum, 30, 23–41.
Hakiki, R., Junaedi, D., & Kaburuan, E. R. (2018). The user interface design for natural science learning media for elementary school. In MATEC web of conferences (Vol. 197, p. 16006). EDP Sciences.
Hubbard, P. (2011). Evaluation of courseware and websites. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp. 407–440). CALICO.
Jimenez, C., Lozada, P., & Rosas, P. (2016, September). Usability heuristics: A systematic review. In 2016 IEEE 11th Colombian Computing Conference (CCC) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
Kartal, E. (2010). The internet, language learning, and international dialogue: Constructing online foreign language learning websites. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE, 11(2), 90–107.
Kaur, K., & Singh, H. (2016, October). Click analytics: What clicks on webpage indicates?. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT) (pp. 608–614). IEEE.
Keshavarz, H., & Givi, M. E. (2020, April). Website evaluation frameworks: IS oriented vs. business oriented models. In 2020 6th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR) (pp. 223–228). IEEE.
Khandare, S. S., Gawade, S., & Turkar, V. (2017, October). Survey on website evaluation tools. In 2017 International Conference on Recent Innovations in Signal Processing and Embedded Systems (RISE) (pp. 608–615). IEEE.
Kir, E., & Kayak, S. (2013). The evaluation of websites teaching English as a foreign language. Social Behavior Sciences, 1(4), 2788–2795.
Kratov, S. (2018, August). On the approaches to the development of a scientific organization website. In 2018 3rd Russian-Pacific Conference on Computer Technology and Applications (RPC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. US, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morris, K. (2019). How to evaluate websites. Retrieved in March 2021 from http://www.kathleenamorris.com/2018/11/20/evaluate-websites/.
Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859.
Pribeanu, C. (2017). A revised set of usability heuristics for the evaluation of interactive systems. Informatica Economica, 21(3), 31-38.
Shen, H., Yuan, Y., & Ewing, R. (2015). English learning websites and digital resources from the perspective of Chinese university EFL practitioners. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 27(2), 156-176.
Son, J. (2005). Exploring and evaluating language learning websites. In J. B. Son, & S. O’Neill (Eds.), Enhancing learning and teaching: Pedagogy, technology and language (pp. 215–227). Post Pressed.
Squire, D., & McDougall, A. (1994). Choosing and using educational software: a teachers’ guide. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Routledge.
Xie, K., Di Tosto, G., Chen, S. B., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2018). A systematic review of design and technology components of educational digital resources. Computers & Education, 127, 90–106.
Zhang, D., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). Chinese postgraduate EFL learners’ self-directed use of mobile English learning resources. Computer Assisted Language Learning, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1662455.
