A Cognitive Study of the NP+de(的)+VP Structure in Mandarin

Authors

  • Linze Li Southwest University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1101.08

Keywords:

NP de VP structure, Endocentric Construction Theory, nominalization affix, cognitive motivation

Abstract

The article presents a cognitive account of the NP+de(的) +VP structure in Mandarin. By making its syntactic functions and cognitive motivations explicit, it shows that the relationship between the constituents of the structure is subject-predicate rather than modifier-head as claimed by previous studies. Based on the new proposals that the structure is exocentric and the particle de is a nominalizing infix, the article offers a possible solution for the long-debated contradiction between the overall nominal functions of the structure and its constituents’ verbal part of speech. We conclude that a cognitive linguistic approach to analyzing structures in Mandarin can be useful in producing a picture of the formation of the structures and revealing how they are cognitively motivated. This study contributes to the development of cognitive studies on Chinese grammar and sheds light on Chinese language instruction in the long run.

Author Biography

Linze Li, Southwest University

College of International Studies

References

Barcelona, A. (2000). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.

Cheng, G. (1999a). Language universals. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.

Cheng, G. (1999b). A new exploration on nominalization and endocentric construction. Modern Foreign Languages, 2, 128-144.

Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 335-370.

Dirven, R. (2005). Major strands in cognitive linguistics. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza and S. Peña (Eds), Cognitive linguistics: internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Berlin: Mouton, 69-100.

Geeraerts, D. & Peirsman, Y. (2011). Zones, facets, and prototype-based metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona and F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view (pp. 89-102). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Guo, R. (2010). A study on Chinese word classes. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Hopper & Thompson. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251-299.

Hu, Y. S. & X. Fan. (1994). Nominalization of verbs and adjectives. Studies of the Chinese Language, 2, 81-85.

Kövecses, Z. & G. Radden. (1998). Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 37-77.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 1-38.

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lu, J. M. (2003). A new approach to analysis on the Chinese “NP de(的) VP” construction. Studies of the Chinese Language, 5, 387-391.

Panther, K. U. & Thornburg, L. (1999). The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Gunter Radden (Eds), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 333–357). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Panther, K. U. & Thornburg, L. (2000). The Effect for cause metonymy in English grammar. In Antonio Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 215–232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Panther, K-U. & G. Radden. (1999). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and Pérez Hernández, L. (2001). Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language and Communication, 4, 321- 357.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Diez, Olga I. (2004). High-level action metonymies in Eng¬lish and Spanish. Jesikoslovlje, 4, 121–138.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Otal, J. L. (2002). Metonymy, grammar and communication. Albolote, Granada: Comares.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Perez, L. (2001). Metonymy and the grammar: Motiva¬tion, constraints, and interaction. Language and Communication, 21, 321–357.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In Barcelona, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 109-132). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Shi, D. X. (2004). Nominalization and the “de(的)” Structure. In Huang, Z. D. (ed.), Linguistics Series 3 (pp. 78-92). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.

Shi, G. G. (1981). The part of speech of “chuban” in “zhe ben shu de chuban”---starting from the endocentric structure theory. Current Research in Chinese Linguistics, 4, 8-12.

Shi, G. G. (1988). The endocentric structures and exocentric structures in Chinese. Studies of the Chinese Language, 4, 265-273.

Si, F. Z. (2002). Marker “de(的)” and relative syntactic issues in Chinese. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 2, 35-40.

Si, F. Z. (2004). Endocentric construction theory and DeP in Mandarin. Contemporary Linguistics, 1, 26-34.

Si, F. Z. (2006). The head theory and the Bloomfieldian Puzzle. Contemporary Linguistics, 1, 60-70.

Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon. 2nd.

Wang, D. M. (2002). The nature of verb in “N 的 V” structure. Language Teaching and Research, 4, 55-64.

Wu, C. A. (2006). Zhe ben shu de chuban: A challenge to Bloomfield’s theory of endocentric construction. Contemporary Linguistics, 3, 193-204.

Xiang, M. B. (1991). On the part of speech of “chuban” in “zhebenshu de chuban”. Journal of Tianjin Normal University, 4, 75-80.

Xiong, Z. R. (2005). A DP structure headed by De. Contemporary Linguistics, 2, 148-165s.

Yang, M. M. (2019). The syntax of “NP zhi (之) VP” in old Chinese. Studies of the Chinese Language, 3, 278-295.

Zhang, B. J. (1993). The formation of “N 的 V” structure. Studies of the Chinese Language, 4, 252-259.

Zhao, M. M. (2019). The syntax of “NP zhi(之) VP” in old Chinese. Studies of the Chinese Language, 3, 278-295.

Zhou, G. G. (2005). Head theory and DeP in Chinese revisited. Contemporary Linguistics, 2,139-147.

Zhou, G. G. (2007). On “NP+de(的)+VP” structure and some relevant issues. Chinese Language Learning, 3, 53-58.

Zhou, G. G. (2007a). On the grammatical consequences of X-bar theory and head theory and their theoretical defects. Journal of South China Normal University, 4, 69-75.

Zhou, G. G. (2007b). On “NP+de(的)+ VP” structure and some relevant issues. Chinese Linguistics, 3, 53-58.

Zhu, D. X. (1983). On self-designation and Trans-designation. Dialect, 1, 16-31.

Zhu, D. X. (1984). On endocentric structure. Studies of the Chinese Language, 6, 401-403.

Zhu, D. X. (1985). On grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Zhu, D. X., J. W. Lu, & Z. Ma. (1961). On the nominalization of verbs and adjectives. Journal of Peking University, 4, 53-66.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles