The Syntax of ʔiˈða al-fud͡ʒɑːʔiːja ‘If of Surprise’ in Classical Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1404.12Keywords:
particles, syntax, The Minimalist Program, small clausesAbstract
This scholarly investigation deals with the intricacies surrounding the syntactical nature of the phenomenon known as “If of Surprise” in the context of Classical Arabic, employing a methodological lens derived from the Minimalist framework. The “If of Surprise” construct represents a unique form of expression that incorporates a particle phonetically resembling the conditional particle “if” in Classical Arabic, yet its underlying structure diverges from establishing genuine conditional relationships. By employing the analytical tools provided by the Minimalist Program, this study scrutinizes the data associated with “If of Surprise” constructions, utilizing several syntactic diagnostics to uncover their distinctive characteristics. The findings of this study unequivocally demonstrate that “If of Surprise” exhibits remarkable traits that set it apart from conventional syntactic patterns. By shedding light on the mechanisms through which these projections operate, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of the sudden interpretive nature exhibited by “If of Surprise” By delving into the intricacies of its syntactic structure and exploring the role of Speech Act Projections, this research contributes to the broader field of linguistic inquiry and aids in unraveling the complexities inherent in the syntax of Classical Arabic.
References
Abdelhady, S., & Alkinj, M. (2023a). A pragmatic analysis of ostensible lies in high-context cultures. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 1-22. DOI:10.1080/23311983.2023.2241275
Abdelhady, S., & Alkinj, M. (2023b). Vocatives of entreaty in Arabic: Evidence for PP selection. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(3), 576-586.
Abdelhady, S. (2021). A Minimalist analysis of jā for coordination in Jordanian Arabic. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 18(1), 59-79.
Abdelhady, S. (2023). A Nanosyntactic analysis of Arabic complementizers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(8), 1888-1899.
Abdelhady, S. (2019). A sociolinguistic study of the use of the definite article (ʔal) in the Jordan Valley. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 32, 7-4.
Abdel Hady, S. (2020). The syntax of ostensible categories in Arabic (Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland).
Abul-Qasim Al-Shabbi—(KADR). (n.d.). Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://lyricstranslate.com/en/kadr-destiny.html
Akkus, F., & Hill, V. (2018). The speaker in inverse vocatives. 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 35), 49–58.
Al Khalaf, E. (2015). Coordination and linear order [Ph.D., University of Delaware]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Al-Seghayar, M. S. (1988). On the syntax of small clauses in Classical Arabic [Ph.D.]. University of Ottawa.
Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge University Press.
Balazs, J. (2012). The Syntax of small clauses. Cambridge University Press.
Basilico, D. (2003). The Topic of small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), 1–35.
Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Classical Arabic dialects. Oxford University Press.
Bliss, H., & Wiltschko, M. (2018). Stsíkiistsi ki stsíkiistsi: The ubiquity of Blackfoot demonstratives in discourse. Discourse Functions of Demonstratives Workshop. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
Boeckx, C. (2012). Syntactic islands. Cambridge University Press.
Bruening, B., & Al Khalaf, E. (2019). Category mismatches in coordination Revisited. Linguistic Inquiry, 51(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00336
Cardinaletti, A. (2020). Small clauses. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585492209
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
Christensen, K. R., Kizach, J., & Nyvad, A. M. (2013). The processing of syntactic islands–an fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(2), 239–251.
Citko, B. (2000). On the syntax and semantics of Polish adjunct clauses. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 8(1/2), 5–27.
Contreras, H. (1987). Small clauses in Spanish and English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166585
Egan, A., & Weatherson, B. (2011). Epistemic modality. OUP Oxford.
Goodwin, W. W. (1873). On the classification of conditional sentences in Greek syntax. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1869-1896), 4, 60–79.
Gully, A. (1995). Grammar and semantics in Medieval Classical Arabic: A Study of Ibn-Hisham’s “Mughni L-Labib”. Psychology Press.
Haddad, Y. A. (2020). Vocatives as parenthetical adjuncts: Evidence from Classical Arabic. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1302
Haegeman, L. (1984). Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica, 18(3–4), 485–502.
Haegeman, L. (2014). West Flemish verb‐based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica, 68(1), 116–139.
Haegeman, L., & Wekker, H. (1984). The syntax and interpretation of futurate conditionals in English. Journal of Linguistics, 20(1), 45–55.
Hill, V. (2007). Vocatives and the pragmatics–syntax interface. Lingua, 117(12), 2077–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002
Hill, V. (2013). Vocatives: How Syntax meets with Pragmatics. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/20550
Köpcke, K.-M., & Panther, K.-U. (1989). On correlations between word order and pragmatic function of conditional sentences in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 13(5), 685–711.
López Sancio, S. (2015). Testing syntactic islands in Spanish. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Universidad Del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea Master Thesis.
Luraghi, S., & Parodi, C. (2008). Key terms in syntax and syntactic theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & W. K. Wilkins (Eds.), Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (Vol. 101, pp. 262–294). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes
Reich, I. (2009). What asymmetric coordination in German tells us about the syntax and semantics of conditionals. Natural Language Semantics, 17(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-009-9041-y
The Nobel Quran. (n.d.). Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://quran.com/?locale=en
Wiltschko, M. (2014). The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology (Vol. 142). Cambridge University Press.
