A Comparative Study on Epistemic Modality in Linguistic Research Article Conclusions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.19Keywords:
modality, research article conclusion, value, orientationAbstract
Epistemic modality is an important and complex linguistic device in academic writing, which could help authors state their claims and positions. The conclusion is also a critical part in research articles, where authors summarize their studies and give suggestions. Many scholars study modality in many aspects, but they rarely focus on its application in research article conclusions. Therefore, this study compared the use of modality in 25 conclusions of linguistic research papers written by native English speakers and 25 English conclusions written by Chinese authors from a systemic functional perspective. It focused on the similarities and differences of the use of modality in linguistic research article conclusions from two perspectives: value and orientation. The results show that both native English speakers and Chinese authors are more likely to rely on low and median value and subjective orientation in their conclusions. The findings suggest that linguistic research article authors tend to make claims in a reserved and tentative way. Moreover, this study shows that Chinese authors are more likely to employ modal expressions and subjective orientation of modality in their conclusions, which may relate to cultural diversity and modality shift. The findings of the study may help non-native English authors to produce linguistic research articles in a more acceptable way.
References
Ahmad, U. (1997). Research articles in Malay: rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 275–303). Austin, TX: De Gruyter
Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 207-224.
Chen, H. I. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 17(2010), 27-51.
Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Hinkel, E. (2009). The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 667-683.
Hu, C., & Li, X. (2015). Epistemic modality in the argumentative essays of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 20-31.
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.
Hyland, K. (2006). Medical discourse: hedges. In Keith Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 694-697). Elsevier.
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.
Lassen, I. (2006). Personality and impersonality in biotechnology discourse. LSP and Professional Communication (2001-2008), 6(2), 48-74.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2011). Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. J Bus Tech Commun, 22, 179-198.
Loi, C. K., Lim, J. M. H., & Wharton, S. (2016). Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1-16.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics: Volume 2 (Vol. 2). Cambridge university press.
Martín, P. M. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 133-152.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied linguistics, 10(1), 1-35.
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality. Cambridge university press.
Sheldon, E. (2019). Knowledge construction of discussion/conclusion sections of research articles written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 1-10.
Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.
Wood, A. (2001). International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 71–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xie, Z. (2022). Epistemic modality and comparison in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31(2), 99-137.
Yang, A., Zheng, S. Y., & Ge, G. C. (2015). Epistemic modality in English-medium medical research articles: A systemic
