The Theory and Practice of Language Ideologies in Modern Societies: A Case Study

Authors

  • Iryna Lenchuk Dhofar University
  • Amer Ahmed Dhofar University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.09

Keywords:

neo-liberal ideology, language commodification, literacy, second language education, cultural capital

Abstract

One of the consequences of the neo-liberal ideology of language commodification, which emphasizes “economic logic, economic integration, professionalism, and effectiveness” (Budach et al., 2003, p. 610) is the changes imposed in the field of literacy and second language learning. From the cultural capital of an individual and community, language has become a commodifiable resource with its value on economic markets. In the process of language commodification, a higher value is assigned to the official language(s). This leads to devaluing the minority languages and to the unequal distribution of the languages that are used in public spaces of schools and other government institutions. The research reviewed for our case study demonstrates that language ideology of the state, which is based on language commodification and on monoglot “standard” (Silverstein, 1996) in defining the state’s social and pedagogical practices, does not promote social cohesion. On the contrary, this ideology informs discriminatory practices that privilege and legitimize the standard variety of the language of the majority over the minority languages, and one type of literacy over the other.

Author Biographies

Iryna Lenchuk, Dhofar University

Department of English Language and Literature, College of Arts and Applied Sciences

Amer Ahmed, Dhofar University

Department of English Language and Literature, College of Arts and Applied Sciences

References

Allen, D. (2007). Just who do you think I am? The name-calling and name-claiming of newcomer youth? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 165-175.

Anderson, B. (2006). Old languages, new models. In B. Anderson, Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (pp. 67-82). London: Verso.

bhabha, h. (1994). Dissemination: Time, narrative and the margins of the modern nation. In h. bhabha, The location of culture (pp. 139-179). London: Routledge.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Block, D. (2008). Language education and globalization. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 31-43). Springer US.

Blommaert, J. (2001). Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers’ stories in Belgium. Discourse and Society, 12(4), 413-449.

Blommaert, J. (2006). Language ideology. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 510-522). Retrieved June 15, 2010, from http://www.sciencedirect.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/science/referenceworks/9780080448541

Blommaert, J., Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S. (2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language and Communication, 25, 197-216.

Blommaert, J., Creve, L., Willaert, E. (2006). On being declared illiterate: Language-ideological disqualification in Dutch classes for immigrants in Belgium. Language and Communication, 26, 34-54.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645-668.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). The production and reproduction of legitimate language. In P. Bourdieu, Language and symbolic power. (Trans. by G. Raymond and M. Adamson, from Ce que parler veut dire), (pp. 43-65). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Budach, G., Roy, S., & Heller, M. (2003). Community and commodity in French Ontario. Language in Society, 32, 603-627.

Cardinal, L. (2005). The ideological limits of linguistic diversity in Canada. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26(6), 481-495.

Cummins, J. (2006). Identity texts: The imaginative construction of self through multiliteracies pedagogy. In O. Garcia, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, and M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and glocalization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221- 240.

Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473-492.

Holborow, M. (2006). Ideology and language: Interconnection between Neo-liberalism and English. In J. Edge (Ed.), (Re-) Locating TESOL in an age of empire (pp. 84-103). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

Kenney, J. (2009). Good citizenship: The duty to integrate. Retrieved June 12, 2010, from http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/DEPARTMENT/media/multimedia/video/speech/2009-03-18.asp

Loughlin, J., & Williams, C. H. (2007). Governance and language: The intellectual foundations. In C. H. Williams (Ed.), Language and governance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

Marx, K. (1845-1846, 1969). Ideology in general, German ideology in particular. In P. L. Gardiner, (Ed.), Nineteenth century philosophy (pp. 284-288). New York: The Free Press.

Marx, K. (1845, 1969). Theses on Feuerbach. In P. L. Gardiner, (Ed.), Nineteenth century philosophy (pp. 281-283). New York: The Free Press.

Medina, J. (2005). Language: Key concepts in philosophy. London: Continuum.

Patten, A., & Kymlicka, W. (2003). Introduction: Language rights and political theory: Context, issues and approaches. In W. Kymlicka and A. Patten (Eds.), Language rights and political theory (pp. 1-51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348-368.

Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot “standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In D. Brenneis & R. K.S. Macaulay, The matrix of language: contemporary linguistic anthropology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Silverstein, M. (1997). Encountering language and languages of encounter in North American Ethnohistory. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 6(2), 126-144.

Street, B. V. (1996). Local literacies and vernacular literacies: Implications for national literacy policy. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Indigenous literacies in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up (pp. 369-385). Hawthorne, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.

Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency, and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes, (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). London: Continuum.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.

Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka, & I. R.Titunik, Trans.). New York: Seminar Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thought and word. In R. W. Reiber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works by L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1 (pp. 243- 285). New York: Plenum Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles