The Impact of Rotation Model on Minimizing Inflectional Morphemes Errors in English Writing: A Comparative Study of Error Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.01Keywords:
rotation model, blended learning, inflectional morphemes errors, English writing errorsAbstract
The study aims to analyze 12th-grade students’ writing errors related to inflectional morphemes. In addition, the research measures efficacy of the Rotation Model (RM) and the Grammar Translation Method (GTM) in minimizing writing errors among learners of English. Comparative studies are rare to find the effectiveness of two teaching models in the context of error analysis. Eighty-two samples were taken into consideration for randomize sampling. The present research is divided into two groups; the experimental group, consisting of 41 participants, provided with instruction via RM, and the control group, also comprising 41 individuals, being taught through GTM. Pre and post-test treatment data were collected and analyzed with the help of SPSS 22. The results revealed common errors with inflectional morphemes among both groups. Additionally, the mean values for each type of error were significantly minimized due to the post-instruction of RM compared to the GTM. The study’s findings largely devoted to pedagogical improvement among ESL learners’ writing. The findings are reviewed concerning future research directions and instructional strategies.
References
Ahmad, S. (1996). Analysis of the errors commonly committed by the Urdu-Hindi speaking children learning English. Aligarh Muslim University, India (unpublished doctoral dissertation) Retrieved June 11, 2023, from http://hdl.handle.net/10603/52293.
Alam S. (2022). Imagine, integrate, and incorporate: English language and its pedagogical implications in EFL classrooms. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 14(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v14n2.10.
Alam S. Faraj Albozeidi H. Okleh Salameh Al-Hawamdeh B. & Ahmad F. (2022). Practice and principle of blended learning in ESL/EFL pedagogy: strategies techniques and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (ijet), 17(11), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29901.
Alam, S. (2023). Pedagogical Implications in EFL Classrooms: A Reflective Praxis of Vocabulary Strategies and Techniques. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(5), 1422-1429. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.31.
Alam, S., & Hameed, A. (2023). Teaching concerns in higher education: impact of covid-19 in pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(1), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.318.332.
Alam, S., & Usama, M. (2023). Does e-feedback impact minimizing ESL writing errors? An experimental study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(04), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i04.36349
Alam, S., Hameed, A., Kobylarek, A., Madej, M. & Ahmad, F. (2023). Drama approaches across higher education in the English curriculum: students perspectives on holistic activity-based teaching. XLinguae, 16(2), 54-68. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2023.16.02.05.
Alam, S., Karim, M. R., & Ahmad, F. (2020). Process drama as a method of pedagogy in ESL classrooms: articulating the inarticulate. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11(1), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.15503/Jecs2020.1.255.272
Alam, S., Usama, M., Alam, M. Moshabbir., Jabeen, I., & Ahmad, F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Global World: A Case Study of Grammarly as E-Tool on ESL Learners’ of Darul Uloom Nadwa. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11), 1741-1747. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1984.
Alam, S., Usama, M., Hameed, A. & Iliyas, S. (2023). Assimilation, incorporation, and integration: Using Facebook on mobile measuring its efficacy and writing errors of ESL learners. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(3).
Alamri, H. A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning technology models that support personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. Tech Trends, 65, 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00530-3
Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, K. (2021). Efficacy of Grammarly in assessing ESL writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 22-34.
Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, K. (2022). Comparative study on ESL writing assessment tools. Applied Linguistics Review, 19(1), 45-60.
Al-Saidat, E. M. (2012). Acquisition of the inflectional morphology of English as a foreign language: an error analysis approach. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v5i0.211
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27, 531-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z.
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs Cambridge, Mass, (1), 1-134.
Barkhuizen, G., & Ellis, R. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
Belazi, N., & Ganapathy, M. (2021). The Effects of the rotation model in promoting Libyan students’ EFL writing: blended learning. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 9(1), 111-127.9.
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 87-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Heinle & Heinle.
Çetereisi, Y., & Bostancı, H. B. (2018). Classification of written errors regarding the language competencies. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 8(10), 234–243
Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching. Hodder Education.
Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corder, S. P. (1982). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D., & Alan, C. L. (Eds.). (2023). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. John Wiley & Sons.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard university press.
Cumming, A. (2013). Assessing integrated skills. The companion to language assessment, 1(2013), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla131.
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eng, L. S., Luyue, C., & Lim, C. K. (2020). A comparison of the English grammatical errors of Chinese undergraduates from China and Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 931-950.
Fleming, N. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK Strategies. Honolulu Community College of Publication.
Florianus, C. C., & Syamsi, V. (2021). Error analysis of inflectional affixation in academic writing of freshman students. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(2), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i2.2759
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
Gardner, H. E. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
Gardner, Q., Branigan, H. P., & Chondrogianni, V. (2021). Spoken and written production of inflectional morphology among L1 Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Memory and Language, 120, 104250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104250
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gayo, H., & Widodo, P. (2018). An Analysis of morphological and syntactical errors on the English writing of junior high school Indonesian students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(4), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.4.4
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (2014). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. Routledge.
Hinkel, E. (2015). Effective academic writing: The complete guide to success. Routledge.
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2017). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. John Wiley & Sons.
Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13, 121-140.
Jinny, J. (2019). A study of English writing skills of standard ix students of Kodagu district Karnataka. Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Retrieved June 11, 2023 from http://hdl.handle.net/10603/288823.
Kachru, Y. (2006). Hindi (Vol. 12). John Benjamins Publishing.
Kazazoğlu, S. (2020). The impact of L1 interference on foreign language writing: A contrastive error analysis. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 16(3), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803621
Keshavarz, M. H. (2012). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage (Rev. ed.). Rahnama Press.
Keshavarz, M. H. (2015). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage. Rahnama Press.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From Method to Post-Method. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larsari, V. N., Dhuli, R., & Chenari, H. (2023, January). Station rotation model of blended learning as generative technology in education: an evidence-based research. In International Conference on Digital Technologies and Applications (pp. 441-450). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (ed.). Oxford University Press
Made Pramestia Dewi, N., Made Madia, I., & Ketut Widhiarcani Matradewi, N. (2021). Error analysis on the use of inflectional morpheme in student’s writing of Bali state polytechnic. International Journal of Research Publications, 81(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp100811720212112
Mahant, P., K., Alam, S, Ghosh S., & Jabeen., I. (2023). Shifting learning atmosphere through process drama: teaching English POS in Indian classrooms. World Journal of English Language, 13(8), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n8p288
Manihuruk, L. M. E. (2022). Error Analysis in using inflectional morphemes students’ recount text of English students. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v5i1.7783
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S Department of Education
Morris, A. M. (2018). Knowledge, intentions, and beliefs about fertility and assisted reproductive technology among illinois college students. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
Muhayyang, M., Limbong, S., & Ariyani, A. (2021). Students’ attitudes on blended learning-based instruction in Indonesian EFL classroom. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(2), 146-162. Retrieved June 11, 2023 from http://www.gnosijournal.com/index.php/gnosi/article/view/110.
Nagy, N. M. A. H. (2018). The Effect of using the station rotation model on preparatory students’ writing performance. Online Submission.
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
Picciano, A. G., Seaman, J., Shea, P., & Swan, K. (2012). Examining the extent and nature of online learning in American K-12 education: The research initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The internet and higher education, 15(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.004
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Sawchuk, S. (2019). Are schools prepared to respond to sex abuse? Latest probe reveals shortcomings. Education Week, 24. Retrieved from Retrieved June 11, 2023 from https://www.edweek.org/leadership/are-schools-prepared-to-respond-to-sex-abuse-latest-probe-reveals-shortcomings/2019/09.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.
Sclater, N. (2017). Learning analytics explained. Taylor & Francis.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. De Gruyter Mouton, 10(1-4), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? John Wiley & Sons.
Smalls, L. (2019). Effectiveness of the station rotation model and flipped classroom model in the middle school setting in increasing students’ scores on classroom and district assessments (Doctoral dissertation, Brenau University).
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight institute.
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International education journal, 7(7), 935-947.
Sunandar, A. (2022). Analysizing errors of inflectional affixes on students’ writings. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 4(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v4i1.777
Swan, B., Coulombe-Quach, X. L., Huang, A., Godek, J., Becker, D., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Meeting the needs of gifted and talented students: Case study of a virtual learning lab in a rural middle school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26(4), 294-319.
Terzioğlu, Y., & Bensen Bostanci, H. (2020). A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824402091454. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914541
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.
Tucker, C. R. (2012). Blended learning in grades 4–12: Leveraging the power of technology to create student-centered classrooms. Corwin Press.
Usama, M. (2023). Does blended learning approach affect madrasa students English writing errors? A comparative study. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 10(3), 097-108. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.103.10.
Wang, L., Huang, Y., & Omar, M. (2021). Analysis of blended learning model application using text mining method. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(1), 172-187.
Xiangze, Z., & Abdullah, Z. (2023). Station rotation with gamification approach to increase students’ engagement in learning English online. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (9), 105-121. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4534571.
Zamri, Z. M., & Narasuman, S. (2023). The effect of blended learning models on ESL students’ self-efficacy and proficiency. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-10
Zhao, C. G., & Liao, L. (2021). Metacognitive strategy use in L2 writing assessment. System, 98, 102472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102472.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
