Applied Arabic Textbook Readability Level for University Students at Al-Balqa Applied University

Authors

  • Al Hatamleh Hanan Ahmad Al-Balqa Applied University
  • Yacoub Naser Hasan Al-Balqa Applied University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1401.22

Keywords:

readability, applied Arabic textbook, Al-Balqa Applied University

Abstract

Readability is considered one of the main indicators of students' ability to understand reading texts. The purpose of this study was to define the level of Applied Arabic textbook readability for university students at Al-Balqa Applied University in Jordan. In order to do so, Cloze Test was administrated on four texts that students didn't read before taken from the Applied Arabic textbook. A sample of (54) university students participated in the study. The results showed that the four texts were within the frustration level, as the students' results on the four texts ranged between (0.46-0.66). There were no statistically significant gender differences on the readability level; indicating that both male and female students are facing difficulty in reading and understanding the texts of books. The study suggested the need for experimentation of textbooks on students to determine their readability level before implementing them to students to be appropriate to students’ reading levels in order to address the problems students face while reading a text.

Author Biographies

Al Hatamleh Hanan Ahmad, Al-Balqa Applied University

Department of Basic Sciences, Al-Huson University College

Yacoub Naser Hasan, Al-Balqa Applied University

Department of Arabic Language, Irbid University College

References

Abduh, M., Mustaufir & Indah, R. (2018). Arabic language production: Challenges for Indonesian adult and children learners. The 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pp. 767-772.

Abusa’aleek, R. & Khataybeh, A. (2020). Analyzing the readability level of the English textbooks used in Jordan, Research in English Language Pedagogy RELP, 8(2), 334-348.

Asem, B. (2012). Readability assessment of printed materials: Going beyond readability formulas. International Journal of Environment, Ecology. Family and Urban Studies, 2(4), 45-56.

Cavalli-Sforzaa, V., Saddikib, H. & Nassiric, N. (2018). Arabic Readability Research: Current State and Future Directions. The 4th International Conference on Arabic Computational Linguistics (ACLing 2018), November 17-19, 2018, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Dominic, W., Louise, H., Steve, H. & Kay, L. (2017). Language and education. The Curriculum Journal, 28(4), 443-445.

Gallagher, T., Fazio, X. & Gunning, T. (2012). Varying readability of science-based text in elementary readers: Challenges for teachers. Reading Improvement, 49(3), 93-112.

Greenfield, J. (2004). Readability formulas for EFL, JALT Journal, 26(1), 5-23.

Gul, S. (2021). Determination of the readability levels of the texts related to biology topics in the science textbook-6. Open Journal for Educational Research, 5(1), 77-90.

Hidayatillah, N. & Zainil, Y. (2020). The readability of students’ textbook used in semantic and pragmatic course in English language education program of UNP. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 144-159.

Hu, J., Gao, X. & Qiu, X. (2021). Lexical coverage and readability of science textbooks for English-medium instruction secondary schools in Hong Kong. SAGE Open, 1-9.

Hu, T. (2023). Readability assessment of advanced English textbooks: A corpus-linguistic study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(1), 252-256.

Janan, D. (2011). Towards a new model of readability. PhD Dissertation, University of Warwick.

Kodom, G. & Pearl, S. (2019). Readability of English language textbooks for diploma students of the University of Cape Coast. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(1), 107-115.

Larsson, P. (2006). Classification into Readability Levels Implementation and Evaluation. Master’s thesis in Computational Linguistics, Beata Megyesi, Uppsala Universitet

Mabwe, N. (2015). Curriculum design and society "A hand in glove" relationship. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 24(4), 207- 220.

McMillan, J. (2008). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (5th ed.). Virginia: Pearson Education.

Mulenga, I. (2019). Conceptualization and definition of a curriculum. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 2(2), 1-23.

Okon, U. (2018). Curriculum definition: A misleading philosophy. International Journal of Advancement in Development Studies, 13(2), 27-34.

Oksuz, H. & Keskin, H. (2022). A study on the impact of readability on comprehensibility. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 322-335.

Priestley, M. & Nieveen, N. (2020). Understanding curriculum. London: SAGE Publishing.

Rabiah, S. (2012). Language as a tool for communication and cultural reality discloser, t International Conference on Media, Communication and Culture “Rethinking Multiculturalism: Media in Multicultural Society” organized by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta and Universiti Sains Malaysia on November, 7th - 8th 2012 in Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Rintaningrum, R. (2019). Explaining the important contribution of reading literacy to the country’s generations: Indonesian’s perspectives. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(3), 936-953.

Rudhumbu, N. & Elize Du Plessis, E. (2021). Factors influencing curriculum implementation in accredited private universities in Botswana. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 1062-1084.

Shamsuddin, S. & Ahmad, H. (2019). Problems of teaching Arabic language to non-native speakers and its methodological solutions. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 151-160.

Sholihah, I. (2018). An analysis the readability level of reading texts in English textbook entitled "Bahasa Inggris" for senior high school student grade XII. Unpublished Master Thesis, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Surabaya.

Sjahrony, A., Lubis., Baharudin, Harun. & Kamis, Mohd. (2017). The Importance Of Motivation In Learning Arabic Among Ipta Students In The Perspective of Literature Review, Asean Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (acer-j), 1(2), 102-112.

Snow, C. (2010). Reading comprehension: reading for learning. International Encyclopedia of Education, 5, 413-418.

Su, S. (2012). The various concepts of curriculum and the factors involved in curricula-making. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 153-158.

Tabaundule, G. (2014). Evaluative research of the implemented secondary school curriculum in Namibia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of the Free State, South Africa.

Yaşar, C. & Aslan, B. (2021). Curriculum theory: A review study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 11(2), 237-260.

Yulianto, F. (2019). An analysis on readability level of English reading texts for eighth grade students. J-SHMIC, 6(1), 81- 91.

Zailani, S., Ahmad, H., Ghani, A., Hani, H., Shaadon, H., Shaadon, Z. & Mustapa, N. (2012). The purpose of reading Arabic text and the problems faced: A preliminary survey at the Faculty of Islamic Studies. Social and Behavioral Sciences, (59), 18-25.

Zhang, B. (2021). Analysis of text readability of college English course books. Open Access Library Journal, (8), 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles