The Effect of Subordination on Antecedent Prominence in Anaphora Processing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1401.14Keywords:
subordination, anaphora, prominence, repeated name penalty, Discourse Prominence TheoryAbstract
One important factor affecting anaphor resolution is the prominence of its antecedent in the discourse. Discourse Prominence Theory (Gordon & Hendrick, 1998) defines antecedent prominence in terms of its height in the phrase structure tree. Two reading time experiments were conducted to test this theory by investigating the effect of subordination on antecedent prominence both within and between sentences. Both experiments had a 2×2 design with Structure (intra- vs. inter-sentential) and Anaphor (pronoun vs. repeated name) as independent variables, and differed in the degree of subordination of the antecedent. The results of the experiments show a main effect of Anaphor such that clauses/sentences containing pronouns were read faster than those containing repeated names, but no interaction between Structure and Anaphor. These results indicate that the repeated name penalty occurs no matter how deeply the antecedent is embedded within subordinate clauses. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that antecedent prominence is not determined by its height in the phrase structure as claimed by Discourse Prominence Theory but rather may be related to the syntactic function (subject) and status (head noun) of antecedents.
References
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Routledge.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications.
Gelormini-Lezama, C. (2018). Exploring the repeated name penalty and the overt pronoun penalty in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 377–389.
Gelormini-Lezama, C., & Almor, A. (2011). Repeated Names, overt pronouns, and null pronouns in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 437–454.
Gordon, P. C., & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 216–231.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311–347.
Gordon, P.C., & Hendrick, R. (1997). Intuitive knowledge of linguistic coreference. Cognition, 62, 325–370.
Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389–424.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 353–379.
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In M. Marcus (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 44–50). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–225.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Ledoux, K., Gordon, P.C., Camblin, C.C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration. Memory & Cognition, 35, 801–815.
Shoji, S., Dubinsky, S. & Almor, A. (2017). The repeated name penalty, the overt pronoun penalty, and topic in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 89–106.
Swaab, T. Y., Camblin, C. C., & Gordon, P. C. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence of reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 715–726.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & & Hue, C. H. (2003). Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition, 86, 283–315.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Wu, J. T. (1999). Comprehension of referring expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 715–743.
