Critical Stylistic Analysis of Self-Conflict in Kazantzakis’ The Last Temptation of Christ

Authors

  • Azhar Hassan Sallomi Kerbala University
  • Wafa’ Abbas Sahan Al-Zahraa University for women

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.32

Keywords:

critical stylistics, assuming and implying, Jesus Christ, self-conflict, ideology

Abstract

The current study investigates the concept of self- conflict in Kazantzakis’ movie version of the novel The Last Temptation of Christ from a critical stylistic perspective. The Last Temptation of Christ is selected as a sample of analysis since it clearly portrays the life of Jesus Christ who struggles with various forms of temptation including fear, doubt, depression, reluctance and lust. Assuming and implying, being one of stylistic tools listed in Jeffries’ (2010) framework, is the only tool examined in this study. Thus, the study aims at showing how such tool is employed by the writer to uncover Christ’s self-conflict. Additionally, the linguistic triggers through which this tool appears are identified to explain further the way linguistic realizations aid to echo the writer’s ideologies to the concept of inner conflict. The study finds out that assuming and implying tool is utilized successfully in this movie as it helps a lot in revealing Christ’s inner conflict in order to live out God’s plan for him while trying to avoid sins. In other words, the linguistic triggers involved in assuming and implying obviously mirror how Christ is challenging to be divine and human.

Author Biographies

Azhar Hassan Sallomi, Kerbala University

English Department

Wafa’ Abbas Sahan, Al-Zahraa University for women

English Department

References

Arslan, C. (2005). Kiilerarası çatıma çözme ve problem çözme yaklaımlarının yükleme karmaıklı açısından incelenmesi [The interpersonal conflict solving and problem solving approaches of university students are investigated according to their attribution complexity]. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

Abbott, H. (2008). The Cambridge Introduction to Narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 55.

Abdul Zahra, S., & Abbas, N. F. (2004). “Cohesive Ties: Conjunctions”. Journal of College of Education for Women, 15(2), 677-691.

Alwisol, T. (2016). Psikologi Kepribadian. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Elliott, S. & Gresham, F. (1993). Social Skills Interventions for Children. Behav. Modification, 17, 287–313.

Engler, B. (2004). Personality Theories: An Introduction (9th ed).Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. p. 193.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Hocker, J. & Wilmot, W. (1995). Interpersonal Conflict (4th Ed.). Madison: WI: Brown & Benchmark.

Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave. pp. 93-105.

Jeffries, L. (2014). ‘Critical stylistics’. In M. Burke (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of stylistics. London: Routledge. p. 414.

Jeffries, L. (2015). Textual Meaning and Its Place in a Theory of Language. In Topics in Linguistics, 15(1). Retrived at: 21st Jun. 2021. Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/30099/1/%255BTopics%in%2520Linguistics%255D%2520Textual%2520meaning%2520and%2520place%2520in%a%2520theory%2520of%2520language.pdf

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2010). Teori Pengkajian Fiksi .Yogyakarta: Gajah Madah Universitu Press. p. 124.

Öner, U. (2006). “Çatıma Çözme ve Arabuluculuk Eitimi”. Yıldız Kuzgun (Ed.) lköretimde Rehberlik. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Daıtım.

Richards, L. (1967). “Christianity in the Novel of Kazantzakis”. The Western Humanities Review, 21. p. 52.

Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. pp. 121-2.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles