Online Corporate Apology Strategies Posted on Twitter in Arabic: A Socio-Pragmatic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.31Keywords:
online apology, corporate apology, Arabic, rapport management, rhetorical movesAbstract
This study aims to identify the types of moves and politeness strategies used in online corporate apology (OCA) in Arabic, posted on customers’ complaints/negative reviews on Twitter. Additionally, the study compares Arabic with English, Japanese, and Chinese to explore cross-cultural similarities and differences in OCA. Following the growth of social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, various studies have focused on identifying the strategies utilized on social media using data from new-age computer-mediated communication. OCA strategies used by companies to restore their image, manage rapport, show accountability, and responsibility have been studied in many languages, but not Arabic. This study collected 271 responses on customer complaints/negative reviews from a company’s account on Twitter and analyzed them using Morrow and Yamanouchi’s (2020) model of rhetorical moves and Spencer-Oatey's (2008) rapport management framework. It revealed 12 OCA moves that were used 1045 times: opening, closing, repair, promising, explanation, expressing reassurance, apology, request, showing appreciation, denying the problem, expressing feelings, and compensation. Closing was the most frequent move, followed by opening and repair. All the previous moves were used in English, Japanese, and Chinese, except promising, expressing reassurance, showing appreciation, expressing feelings, denying problems, and compensation. The findings indicate that the company used 11 moves to enhance rapport and manage customers’ face needs, sociality rights, and interactional goals. Denying the problem was the only move challenging rapport, and was used only 1%. The company seeks to preserve its image to build rapport with customers in OCA.
References
Alhojailan, A. I. (2019). The effects of monolingualism on the apology strategies of Saudi Arabic speakers. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(6), 1–15.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Cenni, I., & Goethals, P. (2020). Responding to negative hotel reviews: A cross-linguistic perspective on online rapport-management. Discourse, Context & Media, 37, 100430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100430.
Cenni, I., & Goethals, P. (2021). Business responses to positive reviews online: Face-work on TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.008.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Doubleday
Ho, V. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of hotel management’s responses to negative online comments. Lingua, 216, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.10.004.
Ho, V. (2020). Do hotels enhance and challenge rapport with customers with the same degree of commitment? Journal of Pragmatics, 166, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.002.
Hodeib, C. (2020). On the discursive expression of politeness in Syrian Arabic: The case of apologies. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomany, 20(2), 1–34. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18460/ANY.2020.2.003.
Hopkinson, C. (2017). Apologies in L1 and lingua franca English: A contrastive pragmatic study of TripAdvisor responses. Discourse and Interaction, 10(1), 49–70. DOI: 10.5817/DI2017-1-49.
Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@ internet, 4(1), 1–37.
Jebahi, K. (2011). Tunisian university students’ choice of apology strategies in a discourse completion task. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.008.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman Group Ltd.
Leech, G. N. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 167–206 https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009.
Lutzky, U. (2021). “You keep saying you are sorry.” Exploring the use of sorry in customer communication on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 39, 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100463.
Lin, C. Y. (2020). Exploring judges’ compliments and criticisms on American, British, and Taiwanese talent shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 160, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.008.
Morrow, P. R., & Yamanouchi, K. (2020). Online apologies to hotel guests in English and Japanese. Discourse, Context & Media, 34, 100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100379.
Page, R. (2014). Saying ‘sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003.
Sato, A. (2018). Apology in/r/language learning: Applying computed-mediated discourse analysis to the investigation of rapport management online. Otarushōkadaigaku jinbun kenkyū [Humanities Research at Otaru University of Commerce], 136, 119–139.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Skytt, F. (2015). Sorry seems to be the hardest word: A case study of corporate apologies on Twitter. Retrieved Apr 15, 2022 from https://www.diva portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A820064&dswid=-228.
pencer-Oatey, H. (2005a). (Im) Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005b). Rapport management theory and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.335.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally Speaking Second Edition: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tereszkiewicz, A. (2020). Complaint management on Twitter–evolution of interactional patterns on Polish corporate profiles. Pragmatics, 30(3), 405–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17040.ter.
Van Hooijdonk, C., & Liebrecht, C. (2021). Sorry but no sorry: The use and effects of apologies in airline webcare responses to NeWOM messages of flight passengers. Discourse, Context & Media, 40, 100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100442.
Xu, Z., & Yan, A. (2020). A pragmatic study of image restoration via corporate apology in Chinese internet corporations. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 76–88.
Yonghong, Q. (2020). Apologies in Chinese restaurants’ responses to negative online reviews and rapport management-A Cross-cultural Perspective. Sinología Hispánica. China Studies Review, 10(1), 119–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18002/sin.v10i1.6318.
Zhang, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2014). Hotels׳ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dissatisfaction. Discourse, Context & Media, 6, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.004.
