Using Nominal Group Technique to Explore Publication Challenges and the Usefulness of AI-Based Writing Technologies: Insights From Indonesian Scholars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.20Keywords:
NNES obstacles in publication, international journal, academic publication, AI-based technology, nominal group techniqueAbstract
In the current academia landscape, academics, particularly those from non-native English speaking (NNES) countries, face formidable challenges in gaining publication in reputable international journals. The dominance of English as the language of scientific dissemination, coupled with limited resources and research infrastructure, hinders NNES academics from meeting the standards of high-impact journals. This issue is particularly pronounced in Indonesia, where most scholars face the additional challenge of conducting research in Bahasa Indonesia and writing manuscripts in English. The purposes of this study were to elicit the obstacles encountered by Indonesian scholars in gaining international publication, and the extent to which the advancement of AI-based writing technologies can provide solution. The study is expected to provide valuable insights into their experiences and contributing to a better understanding of the publishing landscape in Indonesia. The study utilized the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to capture the opinions of four Indonesian academics pursuing their doctoral degrees overseas. The findings highlight the need for user-friendly, comprehensive technology solutions, including Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based software and applications, to assist academics in English academic writing in the Indonesian context. Despite the limitations of current digital writing assistants, they are recommended as useful aids in overcoming language barriers. Access to human consultants was unanimously considered crucial. Initiatives such as advocating for multilingualism and providing language editing services, as well as the availability of online resources and support, are important steps towards addressing disparities in academic publishing. The findings of this research have the potential to inform policies and initiatives aimed at supporting and promoting Indonesian academics in their pursuit of reputable international publications.
References
Adnan, Z., Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Sukamto, K. E. (2021). Perceptions of Indonesian multilingual scholars about preparing and publishing research manuscripts in international journals. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18969
Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P., & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science. PLOS Biology, 14(12), e2000933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933
Amano, T., Rios Rojas, C., Boum II, Y., Calvo, M., & Misra, B. B. (2021). Ten tips for overcoming language barriers in science. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(9), 1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01137-1
Basthomi, Y. (2012). Ambivalences: Voices of Indonesian Academic Discourse Gatekeepers. English Language Teaching, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n7p17
Basthomi, Y. (2016). The Rhetoric of Article Abstracts : a Sweep Through the Literature and a. August, 174–190. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242616900_THE_RHETORIC_OF_ARTICLE_ ABSTRACTS_A_SWEEP_THROUGH_THE_LITERATURE_AND_A_PRELIMINARY_STUDY
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press. CrossRef Google Scholar
Chapple, M., & Murphy, R. (1996). The Nominal Group Technique: extending the evaluation of students’ teaching and learning experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210204
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663–688.CrossRef Google Scholar.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M. (2010). Academic research networks: Accessing resources for English-medium publishing. English for Specific Purposes, 29(4), 281–295. doi: doi:10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
Curry, M., & Lillis, T. (2022). Multilingualism in academic writing for publication: Putting English in its place. Language Teaching, 1-14. doi:10.1017/S0261444822000040
Dobbie, A., Rhodes, M., Tysinger, J. W., & Freeman, J. (2004). Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool. Family Medicine, 36(6), 402–406. Retrieved January 31, 2023, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15181551
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Geiger, V., & Straesser, R. (2015). The Challenge for Non-First-Language-English Academic Publishing in English Language Research Outlets. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 245–252. Retrieved February 19, 2023, from http://survey.hshsl.umaryland.edu/?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED572450&site=ehost-live
Glasman-Deal, H. (2010). Science Research Writing: For Non-Native Speakers of English. Imperial College Press.
Hamamah. (2019). Indonesian Academics' Productivity in Research Publication in Relation to the Demographic Background. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language (ICEL), ISBN 978-602-432-783-5, pp. 5-10. Retrieved from http://icel.fib.ub.ac.id/proceeding/
Hamamah, Emaliana, I., Nurhayani, I., & Delijar, R. M. (2020, March). Gender Discrepancies in Publication Productivity: Opportunities and Drawbacks in Writing and Publishing Research Results Articles. In IISS 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Interdisciplinary Studies Seminar, IISS 2019, 30-31 October 2019, Malang, Indonesia (p. 220). European Alliance for Innovation.
Ishak, C. N., Basthomi, Y., Widiati, U., Hidayati, M., & Yannuar, N. (2021). See: How Indonesian student writers use directives in academic texts. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.81.65.76
Kachru, B. (2001). World Englishes. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.)., Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics (pp. 519-524). Elsevier.
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2009). International engagement versus local commitment: Hong Kong academics in the humanities and social sciences writing for publication. Journal of English for academic Purposes, 8(4), 279-293.
Pedoman Statuta dan Organisasi Perguruan Tinggi, Pub. L. No. 139, 1 (2014).
Lauder, A. (2008). the Status and Function of English in Indonesia: a Review of Key Factors. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v12i1.128
Lintangsari, A. P., Emaliana, I., & Kusumawardani, I. N. (2022). Improving learners’ critical thinking and learning engagement through Socratic questioning in Nominal Group Technique. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.22352
Luo, N., & Hyland, K. (2019). “I won’t publish in Chinese now”: Publishing, translation and the non-English speaking academic. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.003
Marta, M. M., & Ursa, O. (2015). Academic Readers and Writers: Native and Non- Native Speakers of English. Buletin Stiintific, Seria A, Fascicula Filologie, XXIV(1), 87–97. Retrieved February 3, 2023, from http://carletonu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwY2AwNtIz0EUrE4zNgD1n8NEnwA6AsamloUWKGbAha2oArG0SjdNAwx_hzkYBoUbBjqC967A9YqBFlsBSPD8HXGZDN3FDg1QXusYSGHnAPrkxqN_OChp4A2_icvUBn5NqYaxraAQ6TIAVbAryvKqbAEMCbAMOZMUIYuFRETDIQJ1R LEczkuQiQQZ-aLNSw
Okamura, A. (2006a). How do Japanese researchers cope with language difficulties and succeed in scientific discourse in English?: interviews with Japanese research article writers. The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 48(3), 61–78.
Okamura, A. (2006b). Two types of strategies used by Japanese scientists, when writing research articles in English. System, 34(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.03.006
Panggabean, H., Tampubolon, S., & Sembiring, M. (2020). Indonesia’s Ambivalent Language Policy on English: Cause and Effect. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.Ijicc.Net, 14(5). Retrieved February 2, 2023, from www.ijicc.net
Pipit, M., & Rahyono, F. X. (2020). The past tense expression of Indonesian learners: A morphosyntactic review and its implication toward the teaching field. Asian EFL Journal, 27(2), 120–143. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085963517&origin=inward&txGid=62e13769203c618e2667f039488717a5
Rofiqoh, Basthomi, Y., Widiati, U., Puspitasari, Y., Marhaban, S., & Sulistyo, T. (2022). Aspects of Writing Knowledge and EFL Students’ Writing Quality. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.20433
Salichah, I., Irawati, E., & Basthomi, Y. (2015). Hedges and Boosters in Undergraduate Students’ Research Articles. Journal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), 154–160. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph/article/view/4855
Steigerwald, E., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Brandt, D. Y. C., Báldi, A., Shapiro, J. T., Bowker, L., & Tarvin, R. D. (2022). Overcoming Language Barriers in Academia: Machine Translation Tools and a Vision for a Multilingual Future. BioScience, 72(10), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac062
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers and Education, 131(September 2018), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
Vasconcelos, S. (2007). Writing up research in English: choice or necessity? Revista Do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 34(1), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69912007000100013
Vasconcelos, S., Sorenson, M., & Leta, J. (2007). Scientist-friendly policies for non- native English-speaking authors: Timely and welcome. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 40(6), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2007000600001
Vasconcelos, S., Sorenson, M., Leta, J., Sant’Ana, M., & Batista, P. (2008a). Researchers’ writing competence: a bottleneck in the publication of Latin‐ American science? In EMBO reports (Vol. 9, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.143
Vasconcelos, S., Sorenson, M., Leta, J., Sant’Ana, M., & Batista, P. (2008b). Researchers’ writing competence: a bottleneck in the publication of Latin‐ American science? EMBO Reports, 9(8), 700–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.143
Woodward-Kron, R. (2007). Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701494286
Woolston, C., & Osório, J. (2019). When English is not your mother tongue. Nature, 570(7760), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01797-0
Yannuar, N., Shitadevi, I. A., Basthomi, Y., & Widiati, U. (2014). Active and passive voice constructions by Indonesian student writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1400–1408. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.7.1400-1408
