A Nanosyntactic Analysis of Arabic Complementizers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.04Keywords:
nanosyntax, complementizers, Jordanian Arabic, The Mimimalist Program, factivityAbstract
This study investigates the syntactic composition of complementizers in Arabic from a nanosyntactic perspective (Starke, 2009). The study unravels the dichotomy in the behavior of root complementizers in Arabic; it highlights how the selection of complementizers is impacted by presupposed information and the degree of certainty. In spoken varieties of Arabic, such as Jordanian Arabic and Lebanese Arabic, root complementizers are blocked from root positions, but such positions are accessible for Modern Standard Arabic. Refining Ross' (1970) hidden verbs theorem and Fassi Fehri’s (2012) featural distinction, the study shows that if a complementizer is selected by different triggers of veridicality, such as ʔanna in MSA, ʔɨnn in Jordanian Arabic and ʔɘnno in Lebanese Arabic, the complementizer cannot appear without its trigger, whereas if a complementizer is selected by one trigger, such as ʔɪnna in MSA, the complementizer can be used in root positions without a trigger. Comparing the findings of the study with Baunz' (2018) universal hierarchy, we show that the hierarchy in its current status fails to account for Arabic data. The conclusion gives a stronger contribution for the semantic composition of complementizers.
References
Abdel-Razaq, I. (2015). Who is What and What is Who: The Morphosyntax of Arabic WH. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Akku, F. (2018). The left Periphery of Sason Arabic (unpublished). University of Pennsylvania.
Baunz, L. (2018). Decomposing Complementizers: The functional secquence of French, Modern Greek,Serbo-Croatian, and Bulgarian Complementizers. In L. Baunz, K. De Clercq, L. Haegman, & E. Lander (Eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax. Oxford University Press.
Beaver, D. I., & Geurts, B. (2014). Presupposition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014). Retrieved June 2018 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/presupposition/
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2010). Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford University Press.
Clements, G. (1975). The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages, (1)1, 141–177.
Fassi-Fehri, A. F. (2012). Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing.
Habib. R. (2009). The Syntax of the Standard Arabic Particles ʔan and ʔanna. Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Newcastle upon Tyne.
Haegeman, L. (2014). West flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica, 68(1), 116–139.
Hooper, J. B., & Thompson, S. A. (1973). On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(4), 465–497. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Jarrah, M. (2019). Factivity and subject extraction in Jordanian Arabic. Lingua, 219, 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.12.002
Marantz, A. (1997). No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 27.
Nanosyntax—What is it. (n.d.). Retrieved October 13, 2019, from http://nanosyntax.auf.net/whatis.html
Persson M., (2002). Sentential Object Complements in Modern Standard Arabic. Almqvist & Wiksell International. Sweden.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics. Elements of Grammar (pp. 281–337). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7
Ross, J. (1970). On Declarative Sentences. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum, Readings in English Transformational Grammar (pp. 22–227). Ginn and Company.
Saeed, S. (2014). The Syntax and Semantics of Arabic Spatial Prepositions. Nordlyd, (1)23, 1-20.
Starke, M. (2009). Nanosyntax A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, (1)6, 1-10. .
Vandelanotte, L. (2004). Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(3), 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.003
Wiltschko, M., & Heim, J. (2016). The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Studies in Language Companion Series (Vol. 178, pp. 305–340). https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.11wil
