Metadiscourse Functions in Political Speeches: A Study of Three Leaders’ National Addresses

Authors

  • Surakarn Yoovathaworn Kasetsart University
  • Montri Tangpijaikul Kasetsart University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1307.14

Keywords:

metadiscourse, political discourse, national address, political communication, reflexivity

Abstract

This study employs discourse analysis and corpus analysis to investigate the use of reflexive metadiscourse in national addresses delivered by three national leaders, one from Thailand, one from Myanmar, and one from Pakistan, during periods of democratic reform in their respective countries. The corpus of 129,460 running words was constructed by randomly selecting fifteen addresses from each of the leaders’ national address pools. The corpus was analyzed and coded with tags to classify the metadiscourse functions employed by the speakers, and the taxonomy proposed by Ädel (2010) was adapted to serve as the framework for analysis. The search terms “I” and the inclusive “we,” “you,” “let me,” and “let us” were used in screening non-reflexive sentences. The study found that sixteen metadiscourse functions from Ädel’s (2010) taxonomy are present in the corpus, and that 314 (4.09%) of the 7,663 sentences in the corpus have reflexive metadiscourse functions. The study also found significant use of the ‘elaborating’ function, which signals the audience that the speaker is about to elaborate on the current topic and/or emphasize a particular aspect thereof. This function was previously considered an ‘other speech act labelling’ function.

Author Biographies

Surakarn Yoovathaworn, Kasetsart University

Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities

Montri Tangpijaikul, Kasetsart University

Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities

References

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins Publishing.

Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218

Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspective. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215

Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in Political Campaign Talk: A Functional Metadiscourse Approach to Self-mentions in Televised Presidential Debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011

Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.

Aziz, S., Shaheen, U., Fazli, S. K., & Ahmad, M. M. (2021). Political Rhetoric Justifying Emergency: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Musharraf’s Speech. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(4), 4035-4062.

Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’s Political Speech. ARECLS, 7, 23-40.

Bowman, V. (2007). The Political Situation in Myanmar. In M. Skidmore & T. Wilson (Eds.), Myanmar: the state, community and the environment (pp. 1-17). Asia Pacific Press.

Brooten, L. (2013). The Problem with Human Rights Discourse and Freedom Indices: The Case of Burma/Myanmar Media. International Journal of Communication, 7, 681-700. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/1663/876

Bünte, M., & Dosch, J. (2015). Myanmar: Political Reforms and the Recalibration of External Relations. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 34(2), 3-19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341503400201

Chaiyasat, C., & Sudajit-apa, M. (2017). A Corpus-Assisted Critical Metaphor Analysis of General Prayuth Chan-o-cha’s English Subtitled Weekly Addresses on Politics and Democracy-Related Issues in Times of Political Turmoil. Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 70-109. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/87693

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218

Crismore, A. (1983). Metadiscourse: What it is and how it is used in school and non-school social science texts. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 273.

De Castella, K., McGarty, C., & Musgrove, L. (2009). Fear Appeals in Political Rhetoric about Terrorism: An Analysis of Speeches by Australian Prime Minister Howard. Political Psychology, 30(1), 1-26. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20447182

Esmer, E. (2017). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in Turkish Election Rally Speeches Delivered by Pro-Turkish and Pro-Kurdish Leaders. Athens Journal of Social Science, 4(4), 367-384.

Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., Velasco-Sacristán, M., Arribas-Baño, A., & Samaniego-Fernández, E. (2001). Persuasion and Advertising English: Metadiscourse in Slogans and Headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), 1291-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6

Government of Pakistan. (2005). Presidential Addresses. Retrieved June 15, 2006 from http://www.infopak.gov.pk/President_Addresses/presidential_addresses_index.htm

Harris, Z. S. (1959). The Transformational Model of Language Structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 27-29.

Ho, V. (2018). Using Metadiscourse in Making Persuasive Attempts through Workplace Request Emails. Journal of Pragmatics, 134, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015

Holliday, I. (2007). National Unity Struggles in Myanmar: A Degenerate Case of Governance for Harmony in Asia. Asian Survey, 47(3), 374-392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2007.47.3.374

Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring Corporate Rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's Letter. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies. 9(2), 125-143. http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Ilie, C. (2003). Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.05ili

Khan, M. A., & Abid, A. J. (2015). Rationalized Rules: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Selected Autobiographical Political Discourse. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(1), 145-164.

Khan, M. A., Khurshid, M. A., & Malik, N. A. (2017). Euphemized/Dysphemized Expressions As Power-Shield: A Critique Of Selected Political Discourse. Grassroots, 51(2), 420-432.

Khan, M. A., & Malik, N. A. (2016). Pronominal Choices as Rationalization Tool: A Political Discourse Analysis of General Musharraf's Autobiography. Science International (Lahore), 28(2), 2113-2117.

Lerman, C. L. (1985). Media Analysis of a Presidential Speech: Impersonal Identity Forms in Discourse. Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication, 185-215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141.185

Lidauer, M. (2012). Democratic Dawn? Civil Society and Elections in Myanmar 2010-2012. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. 31(2), 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100204

MacKenzie, C. (2002). Building democracy in Pakistan. Journal of Public and International Affairs - Princeton University, 13, 104-122.

Nur, S. (2015). Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches: a Case Study of Nelson Mandela’s Presidential Inauguration Speech. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 30(1), 52-63.

Oo, M. Z. (2014). Understanding Myanmar’s Peace Process: Ceasefire Agreements. Catalyzing Reflection, (2). Bern: Swisspeace.

Phanthaphoommee, N. (2019). The Ideology and Translation of the Thai Prime Minister’s Weekly Addresses (2014-2016) [PhD Thesis, University of Leeds].

President of Pakistan. (2007). General Pervez Musharraf. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from http://www.presidentofpakistan.gov.pk

Royal Thai Government. (2017). PM's weekly address. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from https://thaigov.go.th/news/contents/index/45

Schaffar, W. (2018). The Iron Silk Road and the Iron Fist: Making Sense of the Military Coup D'Etat in Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 11(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2018.1-3

Searle, J. R. (1977). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.

Shah, A. (2002). South Asia faces the future: Democracy on hold in Pakistan. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0017

Talbot, I. (2003). Pakistan in 2002: Democracy, Terrorism, and Brinkmanship. Asian Survey, 43(1), 198-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.2003.43.1.198

The Prime Minister's Office. (2017). Executive Summary Third-Year Performance Report of the Government of General Prayut Chan-o-cha 12 September 2016 - 12 September 2017. The Prime Minister's Office.

Thein Sein (2013, January 1). President U Thein Sein’s New Year Radio Message to the Entire People Far and Wide the Nation. The New Light of Myanmar, 1.

Tjioe, L. N. (2014). Reflexive Personal Metadiscourse in Research Articles on Language Learning: A Discourse Analysis. LEXICON, 3(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v3i1.42104

Walton, M. J. (2015). The Disciplining Discourse of Unity in Burmese Politics. Journal of Burma Studies, 19(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jbs.2015.0003

Wang, J. (2010). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s Speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254-261.

Zhu, Y. (2018). An Intercultural Analysis of Personal Metadiscourse in English and Chinese Commencement Speeches. Advances in Language Literary Studies, 9(5), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.5p.100

Zupnik, Y.-J. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(4), 339-383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles