Rhetorical Strategies of Legal Arguments in Courtrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1307.12Keywords:
courtrooms, language, law, persuasion, rhetoricAbstract
Within courtrooms, law cases are supposed to be won or lost. The criterion upon which this happens is entirely based on the use of rhetoric by attorneys. The rhetorical ability of speakers determines to a great extent where the legal case is going. Based on this assumption, this research paper attempts to investigate the rhetorical strategies of legal arguments in the courtroom, by offering extensive discussions to the different levels of rhetoric employed within courtrooms. These include the lexical level, which focuses on the use of lexis; and the pragmatic level, which sheds light on the intended meaning targeted by courtrooms participants. The main objective of the study, therefore, is to explore the way rhetoric is used to achieve persuasion within courtrooms. Findings reveal that legal rhetoric can linguistically be manifested and practiced within courtrooms at the lexical and pragmatic levels of the linguistic analysis, which in turn demonstrates the integrated connection held between the ideological use of language and law.
References
Aldosari, B. N. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of Nelson Mandela’s defense speech I am prepared to die. Arab World English Journal, 11(2) 3-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.1
Aldosari, B. N. (2022). Investigating the Legal Discourse of Bill Clinton’s Impeachment Trial. Arab World English Journal, 13(2), 140-156. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.10
Aldosari, B., & Khafaga, A. (2020). The language of persuasion in courtroom discourse: A computer-aided text analysis. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(7), 332-340.
Baldwin, J. (1993). Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof. British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 325-352. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048329
Berukstiene, D. (2016). Legal discourse reconsidered: Genres of legal texts. Comparative Legilinguistics, 28, 89-117.
Bizzell, P., & Herzberg, B. (2000). The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical Times to the present. NY: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
Bϋlow-Møller, A. (1991). Trial evidence: Overt and covert communications in court. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1991.tb00004.x
Cheng, L., & Danesi, M. (2019). Exploring legal discourse: a sociosemiotic (re)construction. Social Semiotics, 29(3), 279-285.
Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (2005). Just words: Law, language and power (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Corbett, E. P. J. (1990). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cotteril, J. (2004). Collocation, connotation, and courtroom semantics: Lawyers’ control of witness testimony through lexical negotiation. Applied Linguistics, 25(4), 513-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.4.513
Danet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review, 14(3), 446-564. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053192
Drew, P. (1985). Analyzing the use of language in courtroom interaction. In van Dijk, T. (Ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3, (pp. 133-148). London: Academic Press.
Drew, P. (1990). Strategies in the contest between lawyers and witnesses in court examinations. In J. N. Levi and A. G. Walker (Eds.), Language in the judicial process (pp. 39-64). New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3719-3_2
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Farinde, R. O. (2009). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to the study of language and the law. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
Garver, E. (2009). Aristotle on the kinds of rhetoric. International Society for the History of Rhetoric, 27(1), 1-18. doi:10.1525/rh.2009.27.1.1
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology (6th ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.
Gross, A. G., & Walzer, A. E. (2000). Rereading Aristotle's rhetoric. Carbondale, IL (USA): Southern Illinois University Press.
Gupta, G. (2022).The debate on 'One nation, one language'. International Journal of Language & Law, 11, 1-17.
Hill, F. (2005). The traditional perspective. In Kuypers, Jim A. (ed.), The art of rhetorical criticism (pp. 72-81). New York: Pearson.
Ilie, C. (2015). Questions and questioning. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, and T. Sandel, The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1257-1271). Boston: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi202
Karasev, A., Savoskin, A., & Chufarova, E. (2020). The language of law: concepts and specifics. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 86, 733-739. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.04.02.86
Kennedy, G. A. (trans./ed.). (1991). Aristotle 'on rhetoric': A theory of civic discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Khafaga, A. (2019). Linguistic representation of power in Edward Bond’s Lear: A lexicopragmatic approach to critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 404-420.
Khafaga, A. (2021). Exploring ideologies of function words in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(3): 2089- 2111.https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.30.
Khafaga, A. (2022). Semiotic staging of the ideological point of view in Amiri Baraka’s Slave Ship: A social-semiotic approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2133484
Khafaga, A. (2022). Caught on page! Micro and macro pragmatics of stage directions paretheticals in Tom Stoppard’s Professional Foul. Journal of Pragmatics, 193, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.005
Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Luchjenbroers, J. (1993). Pragmatic inference in language processing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). La Trobe University.
Mead, R. (1985). Courtroom discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Printing Section.
Mey, J. (2016). Discourse, interests, and the law: Some pragma-legal reflections. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 2(1): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0004
O’Barr, W. M. (1982). Linguistic evidence: Language power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech, G., & Stravik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Riner, C. (2020). Language and the law. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0211
Santos, M. (2004). A pragmalinguistic analysis of courtroom questions in a multilingual context. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from: http://www.tesionline.it/consult/pdfpublicview.asp 8309/18309p.pdf
Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards and analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spasov, B. P. (2016). Law and its interpretation. Moscow: Legal Literature.
Tessuto, G. (Ed.). (2016). Constructing legal discourses and social practices: Issues and perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
