Virtue and Progressive Ideology: Destabilizing Social Class in Richardson’s Pamela and Fielding’s Joseph Andrews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.21Keywords:
temptation, chastity, transformation, stratification, hypocrisyAbstract
This essay investigates Richardson and Fielding’s projection of social mobility and the intrinsic conditionality of virtue and honor that is essential for social transformation. Maintaining a virtuous status among morally corrupt people destabilizes the established stereotypical view of social hierarchy and incites some aristocratic people’s passion for their servants, violating the consolidation of social class boundaries. Pursuant to the principles of the progressive ideology, some members of the upper class authoritatively thwart endeavors for upward mobility, except for social progression coupled with moral standing and good reputation that is propitiously received with communal acceptance and approbation. Therefore, the novels entail that values of good ethics, chastity, and piety become fundamental requirements for maintaining and enhancing social standing regardless of any prospective deterioration in the material situation. Both novels resist the ideology that honor as virtue is an inherited value that is vested in a certain class by ancestry and heredity. Contrary to this supposition, both contexts associate moral corruption with social degradation and document it historically to reform sinful practices and immodesty. Finally, the authors aspire for ideal societies where the holders of virtue and honor should be rewarded for resisting moral corruption, the allure of materialism, and the greed of capitalism.
References
Booker, K. (2014). Richardson’s Pamela, Defoe’s Roxana, and emulation anxiety in eighteenth-century Britain. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 14(2), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1353/jem.2014.0019
Caesar, A. H. (2010). Richardson’s Pamela: Changing countries, crossing genres. Journal of Romance Studies, 10(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.3167/jrs.2010.100202
Campbell, J. (1988). “The exact picture of his mother”: Recognizing Joseph Andrews. ELH, 55(3), 643–664. https://doi.org/10.2307/2873187
Cruise, J. (1997). Precept, property, and “bourgeois” practice in Joseph Andrews. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 37(3), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.2307/451048
Eagleton, T. (2005). The English novel: An introduction. Blackwell.
Feilla, C. (2002). Performing virtue: Pamela on the French revolutionary stage, 1793. The Eighteenth Century, 43(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/41467909
Fielding, H. (2001). Joseph Andrews. (P. A. Scanlon, Ed.). Broadview Literary Texts. (Original work published 1742)
Flint, C. (1989). The anxiety of affluence: Family and class (dis)order in Pamela: Or, Virtue Rewarded. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 29(3), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/450652
Folkenflik, R. (1972). A room of Pamela’s own. ELH, 39(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2872701
Füger, W. (2004). Limits of the narrator’s knowledge in Fielding’s Joseph Andrews: A contribution to a theory of negated knowledge in fiction. Style, 38(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.5325/style.38.3.278
Gooding, R. (1995). Pamela, Shamela, and the politics of the Pamela vogue. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 7(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1995.0021
Harol, C. (2004). Faking it: Female virginity and Pamela’s virtue. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 16(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.2004.0030
Hershinow, S. I. (2014). When experience matters: Tom Jones and “virtue rewarded”. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 47(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-2789084
Holm, M. D. (2010). “O vanity!” Fielding’s other antisocial affectation. Philological Quarterly, 89(2/3), 263–281.
Ingrassia, C. (1998). “I am become a mere usurer”: Pamela and domestic stock-jobbing. Studies in the Novel, 30(3), 303–323. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/29533276.
Leiman, J. L. (2009). “Booby’s fruitless operations”: The crisis of male authority in Richardson’s Pamela. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 22(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.22.2.223
McKeon, M. (1987). The origins of the English novel: 1600-1740. John Hopkins University.
Parkes, C. (2007). Joseph Andrews and the control of the poor. Studies in the Novel, 39(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/29533797
Pritchard, W. (2017). Pamela’s wedding night. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 57(3), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2017.0022
Richardson, S. (2021). Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded. Global Grey Ebooks. (Original work published 1740)
Roxburgh, N. (2012). Rethinking gender and virtue through Richardson’s domestic accounting. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 24(3), 403–429. https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.24.3.403
Soni, V. (2015). Judging, inevitably: Aesthetic judgment and novelistic form in Fielding’s Joseph Andrews. Modern Language Quarterly, 76(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-2865008
Sorlin, S. (2020). Readerly freedom from the nascent novel to digital fiction: Confronting Fielding’s Joseph Andrews and Burne’s “24 hours with someone you know”. Narrative, 28(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2020.0005
Stephanson, R. (1992). “Silenc’d by authority” in Joseph Andrews: Power, submission, and mutuality in “The history of two friends”. Studies in the Novel, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/29532833
Toise, D. W. (1996). A more culpable passion: Pamela, Joseph Andrews, and the history of desire. CLIO, 25(4), 393–419.
