Trends in Teaching Critical Reading in the Thai Context

Authors

  • Siraprapha Ratanaruamkarn Buriram Rajabhat University
  • Surachai Piyanukool Buriram Rajabhat University
  • Akkarapon Nuemaihom Buriram Rajabhat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.17

Keywords:

critical reading, English Language Teaching (ELT), teaching levels

Abstract

This study identifies and reviews recent research on trends in teaching methods and teaching levels for teaching critical reading skills in Thailand. Thirteen relevant studies were analyzed, including academic documents and research published between 2011 and 2022. The data were organized into two categories including the teaching methods and teaching levels. The results revealed eight popular teaching methods for teaching critical reading skills, including literature-based instruction, the group reading strategy (GRS), the QUEST analysis method, the multimodal tasks method, the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) model, the program for international student assessment (PISA) reading literacy assessment method, the applied linguistic-based method, and the survey, question, read, recite, record, react, and review (SQ5R) method. Moreover, critical reading is taught at three levels in Thailand: the university level, secondary school level, and elementary school level. This study is for those interested in finding an appropriate method for teaching critical reading in the Thai context.

Author Biographies

Siraprapha Ratanaruamkarn, Buriram Rajabhat University

English Language Teaching Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Surachai Piyanukool, Buriram Rajabhat University

English Language Teaching Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Akkarapon Nuemaihom, Buriram Rajabhat University

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

References

Barkhuizen, G. (2002). The QUEST for an approach to guided critical reading and writing. Prospect, 17(3), 19-28.

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 2-11.

Chawwang, N. (2008). An Investigation of English Reading Problems of Thai 12th-Grade. Students in Nakhonratchasima Educational Regions 1, 2, 3, and 7 (Master Dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University).

Chiruguru, S. (2020). The Essential Skills of 21st Century Classroom (4Cs). Singhania University.

Delaney, H. (2019, April 22). Education for the 21st Century. UNICEF Thailand. Retrieved May 5, 2022, from https://www.unicef.org/thailand/stories/education-21st-century

Doungwilai, D. (2022). The Effects of Learning Management Using the SQ5R Reading Process to Promote Critical Reading Ability and Reading Behavior of Elementary School Students. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 17(2), 97-106.

Halvorsen, A. (2018). 21st Century Skills and the “4Cs” in the English Language Classroom. University of Oregon.

Huijie, L. (2010). Developing a hierarchical framework of critical reading proficiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), 33(6), 40-54.

Jewitt, C. (2008). Technology, literacy, learning: A multimodal approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Kaowiwattanakul, S. (2021). CEFR Based Learning Approach: Using Literature to Enhance EFL Students’ Reading Skills and Critical Thinking Skills. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 14(11), 66-79.

Khamkhong, S. (2018). Developing English L2 Critical Reading and Thinking Skills through the Pisa Reading Literacy Assessment Framework: A Case Study of Thai EFL Learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 83-94.

Khummasorn, J. (2015). A Critical Reading Development in Matayomsuksa 5 Students by using SQ5R Method via Newspapers (Master Dissertation, Mahasarakham University).

Kurland, D. J. (2000). What is critical reading? Retrieved on May 5, 2022, from http://www.criticalreading.com/critical_reading.htm.

Kwon, T. (2020). The Effects of the Use of Literature in Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning on Thai students’ Critical Reading Skills and Cultural Awareness. Payap University Journal, 30(1), 16-25.

Longsombun, A. (1999). Achievement in English of Mathayomsuksa 6 students (Language Program) in Government Schools in Educational Region 1 (Master’s thesis, Kasetsart University).

Maley, A & Duff, A. (1990). The Inward Ear: Poetry in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Namsaeng, P. (2022). The Potential of CLIL for Promoting Critical Thinking Skills in Thailand. Humanities & Social Sciences, 39(1), 182-206.

Namsaeng, P & Sukying, A. (2021). The Effect of Group Reading Strategy on Critical Thinking Skills in Thai EFL. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 30-40.

Pantito, B. (2020). Development of Teaching Reading through Reading Strategies for Enhancing Learners Based Applied Linguistics. Mahachula Academic Journals, 7(2), 330-342.

Phaengsopha, W., & Jongkonklang, S. (2020). A Study of Analytical Reading of Grade Fifth Students through the SQ5R Method with Graphic Organizers and Differentiated Instruction. KKU Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (Graduate Studies), 8(3), 113-125.

Rashid, R. A., Vethamani, M. E., & Rahman, S. B. A. (2010). Approaches Employed by Teachers in Teaching Literature to Less Proficient Students in Form 1 and Form 2. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 87-99.

Ratanaruamkarn, S. (2022). A Synthesis Study of Literary Texts to Enhance EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills. In Proceedings of the 5th National and International Research Conference 2022, 251-262. Buriram Rajabhat University.

Sangkaew, T., & Buasomboon, B. (2020). Developing a Model of Literature Teaching through ACDEA to Enhance Critical Reading Skill of Thai Student Teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Review (JHSSR), 22(2), 62-74.

Schnell, T. R. (1978). Identifying the basic elements of critical reading. Reading Horizons, 19(1), 34-39.

Sriwantaneeyakul, S. (2018). Critical Reading Skills and Translation Ability of Thai EFL Students: Pragmatic, Syntactic, and Semantic Aspects. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 11(4), 1-14.

Stauffer, B. (2020). What Are 21st Century Skills?. Applied Educational Systems. Retrieved on May 5, 2022, from https://www.aeseducation.com/blog/what-are-21st-century-skills.

Suaysee, N., & Thienpermpool, P. (2018). The Development of English Critical Reading Abilities Using the QUEST Analysis for English Majors. Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 1-11.

Sutherland, A., & Incera, S. (2021). Critical Reading: What Do Faculty Think Students Should Do? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(3), 1-24.

Taglieber, L. K. (2003). Critical reading and critical thinking. Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, (44), 141-163.

Talebi, M., & Marzban, A. (2015). The Effect of Teaching Critical Reading Strategies on Advanced Iranian EFL Learners' Vocabulary Retention. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 572-580.

Tangpinijkarn, M., & Modehiran, P. (2018). Effects of Critical Reading Instruction Using Literature on Critical Reading Ability of Upper Secondary School Students. An Online Journal of Education, 11(4), 610-623.

The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-93.

Varaporn, S., & Sitthitikul, P. (2019). Effects of multimodal tasks on students’ critical reading ability and perceptions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 81-108.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles