The Role of Linguistic Structure in Sentence and Text Comprehension: A Comparative Analysis of Depth-First Versus Breadth-First Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.01Keywords:
linguistic structure, text sentences, breadth-first model, depth-first model, linguistic comprehension skillsAbstract
This study assumes that linguistic structure plays a significant role in comprehending sentences and texts. It also assumes that the process of learning requires inferences to make connections across and within the local and global discourse contexts. To establish these connections, there is a need of integrating information from prior content of discourse and knowledge or from the reader's schemata to build a coherent memory that represents the events and concepts which describe the texts. To that end, the paper reviews studies on depth-first versus breadth-first models, adopted by the parsers, which address the linguistic structure in sentence and text comprehension. It further examines how the readers’ or listeners’ long-term memory and mental models affect the sentence and text comprehension. The findings of the study show that vocabulary depth and breadth are two important constructs to consider while assessing higher-level processing of reading comprehension. It also shows that having a comprehensive understanding of the gradations of the meaning of a word in a variety of contexts will permit the readers to develop a better understanding of the text, and in turn, to better express themselves.
References
Altmann, G. T., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(5), 685-712.
An, S. (2013). Schema Theory in Reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), pp. 130-134.
Andrews, S., & Bond, R. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 687–711. Doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9137-7.
Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(4), 471-481.
Bear, J. (1983). A Breadth-First Parsing Model. In IJCAI (pp. 696-698).
Binder, K. S., Cote, N. G., Lee, C., Bessette, E., & Vu, H. (2017). Beyond breadth: The contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers. Journal of research in reading, 40(3), 333-343.
Buswell, G. 1937. “How adults read.” Supplementary educational monographs Number 45. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. In Sticht and Armstrong 1994, pp.43-50. (PDF) The Principles of Readability. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228965813_The_Principles_of_Readability [accessed Jun 14, 2022].
Carrell, P. L., & Wise, T. E. (1998). The relationship between prior knowledge and topic interest in second language reading. Studies in second language acquisition, 20(3), 285-309.
Chall, J. S. (1958). The Roswell-Chall Diagnostic Reading Test of Word Analysis Skills. The Reading Teacher, 11(3), 179-183.
Clifton Jr, C. (2015). Sentence Comprehension, Psychology of. Available on the following website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323838945_Sentence_Comprehension_Psychology_of [accessed September 18, 2022]
Clifton, C. (1992). Tracing the course of sentence comprehension: How lexical information is used. In Eye Movements and Visual Cognition (pp. 397-414). Springer, New York, NY.
Clifton, C. (1993). Thematic roles in sentence parsing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologieexpérimentale, 47(2), pp. 222-246.
Clifton, C., Dillon, B., & Staub, A. (2019). Lyn Frazier’s Contributions to Psycholinguistics: An Appreciation. In Grammatical Approaches to Language Processing (pp. 1-10). Springer, Cham.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and speech, 40(2), 141-201.
Forrest, D. & Schijndel, M. (2020). Interaction with context during recurrent neural network sentence processing. Accessed online via https://cognitivesciencesociety.org. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Accessed 3rd of Oct. 2022.
Fodor J A, Bever T G, Garrett M F (1974). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fodor, J. D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, (9), 427-474.
Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2020). Jacques Mehler's early psycholinguistic days in Paris. Cognition, p. 104483. DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104483
Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. University of Connecticut.
Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1997). Construal: Overview, motivation, and some new evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(3), 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025024524133
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive psychology, 14(2), 178-210.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277 (78)90002-1.
Harkio, Noora &Pietilä, Päivi. (2016). The Role of Vocabulary Breadth and Depth in Reading Comprehension: A Quantitative Study of Finnish EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 7(6) 1079-1088. Doi: 10.17507/jltr.0706.03.
Hu, H. C. & Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Unknown word density and reading comprehension. Reading in Foreign Language, 13(1), 403-430. Accessed online via the following link: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Unknown-vocabulary-density-and-reading-Hu-tion/c9d67579b0ea5b638d12939c1824f26dfb01a8fa. Accessed 11 Oct. 2022.
Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2(1), pp. 15– 47- Available on: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277 (72)90028-5.
Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse processes, 39(2-3), 125-128.
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), pp. 611–634.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive psychology, 9(1), 111-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285 (77)90006-8.
Marcus, M. P. (1978). A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
McDougall, S. J., & Donohoe, R. (2002). Reading ability and memory span: Long-term memory contributions to span for good and poor readers. Reading and Writing, 15(3), 359-387.
Mitchell, D. C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.) (1994), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd edition, pp.375-409) New York: Academic Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, K., &Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of research in reading, 27(4), 342-356.
Ouellette, G. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 544-566
Qian, D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review 56(2), 282–307.
Qian, D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Raffaella, B. (2014). Computational Linguistics: Parsing. Available at http://disi.unitn.it/~bernardi/Courses/CompLing/Slides_05_06/cl_w2b.pdf (Accessed: February 2021).
Rahman, Z. U., & Iqbal, Z. (2019). Relationship of Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in Learning English. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(3), 89-100.
Rashidi, N., &Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behaviour, 22(3), 358-374.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, A. J. (2008). The style files: write to read breadth first, not depth first. Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, 35(1), 17-19. ISSN 0311-0729.
Rogde, K., & Hagen, A. A. M., Melby-LervAag, M., &LervAag, A.(2019). The effect of linguistic comprehension instruction on generalized language and reading comprehension skills: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(4), e1059.
Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 259-272.
Safi, D., Lefebvre, P., & Nader, M. (2020). Literacy acquisition: Reading development. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology(Vol. 173, pp. 185-199). Elsevier.
Shen, Y. (2008). An Exploration of Schema Theory in Intensive Reading. English Language Teaching, 1(2), 104-107.
Smith, M. J. (1982). Cognitive schema theory and the perseverance and attenuation of unwarranted empirical beliefs. Communications Monographs, 49(2), 115-126.
Snow, C. E., Tabors, P. O., Nicholson, P. A., & Kurland, B. F. (1995). SHELL: Oral language and early literacy skills in kindergarten and first-grade children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10(1), 37-48.
Stahl, S. A. (2003) Vocabulary and readability: How knowing word meanings affect comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 241-247.
Stowe, L. A. (1989). Thematic structures and sentence comprehension. In Linguistic structure in language processing(pp. 319-357). Springer, Dordrecht.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., &Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and cognitive processes, 4(3-4), SI211-SI234.
Tannenhaus, M. K., & Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. (2006). Modelling thematic and discourse context effects with a multiple constraints approach: Implications for the architecture of the language comprehension system. In M. W. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 90–118). Cambridge University Press.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373.
Uszkoreit, H. (1991). Strategies for adding control information to declarative grammar. In 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(pp. 237-245).
Van den Broek, P., &Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5-6), 360-372.
Yan, N. (2020). A Brief Analysis of the Schema Theory on the Teaching of English Reading. In International Conference on Modern Educational Technology and Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ICMETIE 2020) (pp. 205-207). Atlantis Press.
