Communicative Competence Fostered in a Nested EFL Learning Ecology: Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Chinese Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1211.10Keywords:
affordance, WeChat, usage-based approach, feedback loops, formative assessmentAbstract
This study investigates the self-perceived effectiveness of a nested EFL learning model designed to create an affordance-rich learning ecology to help EFL learners realize the co-evolution of vocabulary knowledge and communicative competence. Adopting an action research approach, this study examined the predicament college students encountered under the CLT paradigm in the Chinese context, and the learning difficulties were identified. A nested EFL learning model was designed to address the issue by creating an effective learning environment in which micro, meso and exo systems interacted with each other to provide multi-mode usage events for the EFL learners’ language development. Quantitative data was collected from two online surveys (N=91) and analyzed with IBM SPSS 26, and qualitative data was elicited from students’ reflective accounts. The results revealed that the model positively affected students' language development regarding their vocabulary acquisition, listening and speaking proficiency. Other benefits derived from the learning experience outside the classroom, represented by an innovative WeCo (We Connect) reports project based on WeChat, are reflected in students’ growing self-confidence as EFL learners and their awakening consciousness to learn English by using the language. Some constructive suggestions were proposed to improve the model. The design in this study provides a solution to the learning difficulties perplexing most EFL learners. It sheds light on how teacher-guided self-regulated English learning beyond the classroom can be augmented by modern technologies to develop communicative competence accompanied by the growth of productive vocabulary knowledge.
References
Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383-411.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chan, J. Y. H. (2019). Four decades of ELT development in Hong Kong: Impact of global theories on the changing curricula and textbooks. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 729-753.
Chen, Y-M. (2020). How a teacher education program through action research can support English as a foreign language teachers in implementing communicative approaches: A case from Taiwan. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1-16.
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Dall, J. (2007). Editor’s introduction. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Dall (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 1-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Deci., E. L., & Moller, C. (2005). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In: AJ. Elliot and CS. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 578- 597). New York/London: Guilford Press.
Diessel, H. (2017). Usage-based linguistics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. (pp. 1-25). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno, & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–73). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Second language acquisition research series: Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 75-94). New York: Routledge.
Feng, Z. (2013). A Study on the perceptions of secondary school students regarding the form-focused and communication-focused English instruction. English Linguistics Research, 2(2), 43-52
Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229-244.
Gilmore, A. (2011). “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786-819.
Hu, G., & McKay, S. L. (2012). English language education in East Asia: some recent developments. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 345-362.
Huang, Y.P., & Jhuang, W.T. (2015). Affordance of English-medium instruction contexts in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 12(1), 1-35.
Jurkovič, V. (2019). Online informal learning of English through smartphones in Slovenia. System, 80, 27-37.
Kacetl, J., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in English language learning—A challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences, 9(3). 1-9.
Kan, Q., & Tang, J. (2018). Researching mobile-assisted English language learning among adult distance learners in China. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 1-28.
Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out-of-Class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278-308.
Langacker , R. W . ( 2009 ). Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter .
Lier, L.V. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer. Academic Publishers.
Lier, L.V. (2008). Ecological-semiotic perspectives on educational linguistics. In: B. Spolsky, and F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp.596–605). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Liu J. (2017). Present situation and innovative approaches of foreign language teaching reform in colleges and universities. Argo Food Industry Hi Tech, 28(1), 167-170
Nunan, D. & Richards, J.C. (2015). Preface. In D. Nunan, & JC. Richards (Eds), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp.xi–xvi.). New York: Routledge.
Qian, Y. B., & Sun, Y. (2019). Autonomous learning of productive vocabulary in the EFL context: An action research approach. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(1), 159-173.
Shi, L., Delahunty, J., & Gao, X. (2018). Constraints preventing Chinese EFL teachers from putting their stated beliefs into teaching practice. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 774-789.
Shin, G.-H. (2017). Developmental aspects of English argument structure constructions for Korean-speaking second language learners: Usage-based constructional approaches to language development. Ampersand, 4, 10-20.
Sun, C., Wei, L., & Young, R. F. (2020). Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 382-410.
Supasiraprapa, S. (2019). Frequency effects on first and second language compositional phrase comprehension and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(4), 987-1017.
Tomasello M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CIW Team. WeChat users & platform insights 2022 (May 18, 2022). Retrieved September 1, 2022, from https://www.chinainternetwatch.com/31608/wechat-statistics/
Zima, E., & BrÔNe, G. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 485-498.
