PF-Representation of Tense Feature on DPs: Morphosyntax of the φ-Agreeing T-Marker Tau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.14Keywords:
syntax, tense feature, PF-chain, T-marker, probe goalAbstract
This research revises, develops and offers empirical evidence to two assumptions discussed in Pesetsky & Torrego’s (2007) theory which claims that tense feature [T] is associated with and expressed on DPs in syntax. Investigating the syntax of a T-marker tau, used in Najdi Arabic, in contexts where tau interacts with DPs in the spine of the clause, empirical evidence is provided that [T] assumed to be associated with DPs is generated in syntax and spelled out at PF. This takes place by the minimalist strategy where a clitic φ-agreeing with the relevant DP is spelled out on tau.[1]This clitic is a PF device indicating that a DP is marked with Tense information RECENT. This clitic is morphological realisation of φ-content on tau that is processed in syntax in turn of tau’s valuation to [T] on a DP. Mapping syntax-morphosyntax to LF, Agree (Chomsky 2001) is established between tau and a DP in which i-[T] on tau values u-[T] on the DP on the condition that i-[φ] on the DP value u-[φ] on tau. Furthermore, this analysis, contrary to Pesetsky & Torrego (2007), claims that [φ]-features on T° are crucial in valuing [T] feature on DP.[2][3][1] T-marker = Tense marker.[2] We represent the notion of feature using the convention ‘square brackets’ with the feature label. So, [T] means Tense feature and [φ] means [φ]-features.[3] LF = Logical form interface (Thought interface). PF = Phonological form interface (Sound interface).
References
Alshamari, M. (2017a). Topic particles in the North Hail dialect of Najdi Arabic. UK: Newcastle University (Doctoral dissertation).
Alshamari, M. R. (2017b). A feature-based analysis of the syntax of the clause-initial particle ʁedɪ in North Hail Arabic. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 53(3), 305-343.
Alshamari, M. & Holmberg, A. (2019). Topic particles, agreement and movement in an Arabic dialect. In 42nd GLOW (Generative Linguistics in the Old World) Conference. Newcastle University.
Alshamari Murdhy. (2021). Contrastive Focus particles, CF-chain interpretation and multiple agreement in North Hail dialect of Arabic. CamCoS 9 New (Cambridge Comparative Syntax in Newcastle 9).
Alshamari, Murdhy & Naimah, Al-Ghamdi. (2021). Multi-Functionality of the Discourse Marker haweɪh in Ghamdi Dialect of Hijazi Arabic: Interaction of CP-Features?–A Minimalist-Cartographic Account. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 2021, 8.1: 1979307.
Alshammari, Naif. (2019). Multiple and conjoined wh-questions in Najdi Arabic UK: Newcastle University (Doctoral dissertation,).
Bayer, J. (1996). Directionality and Logical Form: On the scope of focusing particles and wh-in-situ (Vol. 34). Springer Science & Business Media.
Bayer, J. & Trotzke, A. (2015). The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles. In Josef. B & Roland. H & Andreas. T (eds). Discourse-oriented syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 226: 13-40.
Bayer, J. & Struckmeier, V (ed.). (2017). Discourse particles: Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2016.
Bayer, J. & Obenauer, H. (2011). ‘Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types’. The linguistic review 28: 449-491.
Bianchi, V. & Frascarelli, M. (2010). Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2: 43-88.
Biberauer, T. & Sheehan, M. (2011). Introduction: particles through a modern syntactic lens. The Linguistic Review 28: 387-410.
Biberauer, T., Liliane. H, & A. Kemenade. (2014). Putting our heads together: towards a syntax of particles. Studia Linguistica 68: 1-15.
Bošković, Ž. (2007). ‘On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory’. Linguistic inquiry 38: 589-644.
Boukhris, F. (1998). Les clitiques en berbère tamazighte: approche minimaliste. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Université Mohamed V: Rabat.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). ‘Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework’. In H. Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds) Step by step.' essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard, L. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). ‘Derivation by phase’. In M. Kenstowicz (ed) Ken Hale. A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1-52.
Sigurðsson, H.Á. (2009). Remarks on features. Explorations of phase theory: Features and arguments, pp.21-52.
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. Current Studies in Linguistics Series, 45, p.133-166.
Coniglio, Marco. (2008). Modal particles in Italian. Working Papers in Linguistics. 18: 91-129.
Coniglio, M. and Zegrean, Iulia. (2010). Splitting up Force, evidence from discourse particles. Linguistics 20: 7-34
Frascarelli, M. & Hinterhölzl, R. (2007). ‘Types of Topics in German and Italian’. In Susanne, W and Kerstin, S (eds.) On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87-116.
Frascarelli, Mara. (2008). ‘The fine structure of the topic field’. In C. De Cat and K. Demuth (eds) The Bantu-Romance Connection. A Comparative Investigation of Verbal Agreement, DPs, and Information Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 261-292.
Holmberg, A., Michelle. S, & van der Wal, J. (2017). Movement from the double object construction is not fully symmetrical. Linguistic Inquiry. 50(4). 677–722. DOI:10.1162/ling_a_00322
Jarrah, M & Alshamari, M. (2017). The syntax of the evidential particle ʃikil in Jordanian Arabic. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 29-56.
Jarrah, M. (2019). Record your agree: A case study of the Arabic complementizer ʔinn. Journal of Linguistics, 55(1), 83-122.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax (No. 25). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kramer, R. (2014). Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(2), 593-634.
Lasnik, H. 1995. ‘Case and expletives revisited: On Greed and other human failings.’ Linguistic inquiry 26: 615-633.
Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why agree? Why move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ouhalla, J. (1988). The syntax of head movement: A study of Berber. PhD Thesis: University of London.
Ouhalla, J. (1994). Focus in standard Arabic. Linguistics in Potsdam 1: 65-92.
Ouhalla, J. (1996). ‘Remarks on binding properties of wh-pronouns’. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 676-708.
Ouhalla, J. (1997). Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. In M. Eid and R. R. Ratcliffe (eds). Perspectives on Arabic linguistics X: papers from the Tenth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 9-45.
Ouhalla, J. and Shlonsky, U. (2002). Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntax. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pesetsky, D & Esther. T. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture, ed by S. Karimi, V. Samiian, and W. Wilkins, 262-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality and left periphery. Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 3, pp.223-251.
Struckmeier, V. (2014). Ja doch wohl C? Modal Particles in German as C‐related elements. Studia Linguistica 68: 16-48.
Zeijlstra, H. (2012). There is only one way to agree. The linguistic review, 29(3), pp.491-539.
