Intertextual Reading: Analyzing EFL Context via Critical Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1205.18Keywords:
intertextuality, critical thinking, reading, EFL studentsAbstract
One of the most significant debates among academics is the role of critical and logical thinking in constructing and assuring meanings of intertextual texts. This argument is, however, more valid in the context of undergraduate EFL learners, who have the potential to use their critical thinking and creativity in the act of reading. The phenomenon of intertextuality acts as a constructive and meaningful link between readers and texts. In other words, the reading texts become comprehensible when readers connect what they read to their prior knowledge, using critical thinking skills to understand and interpret them. This study examines how critical and logical thinking skills make intertextual connections between texts and readers’ personal and social experiences during reading tasks. For this purpose, a semi-structured interview based on an excerpt from an article ''Women in the Working Class'' was conducted with EFL students to collect their responses on intertextual connections. The analysis of the interviews revealed that intertextual reading helps promote critical thinking among readers of EFL and assist them in analysing, synthesising, interpreting, and evaluating texts. The findings of this study have some pedagogical implications due to the multicultural complexes of values and images in reading English literary texts.
References
Ahmadian, M., & Yazdani, H. (2013). A study of the effects of intertextuality awareness on reading literary texts: The case of short stories. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(2), 155.
Alagozlu, N. (2007). Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(3), 118–136.
AlGhamdi, M. A. (2018). Arabic Learners’ Preferences for Instagram English Lessons. English Language Teaching, 11(8), 103–110.
Al Ghamdi, A. K. H., & Deraney, P. M. (2013). Effects of Teaching Critical Thinking to Saudi Female University Students Using a Stand-Alone Course. International Education Studies, 6(7), 176–188.
Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.
Alvermann, D.E., & Moore, D.W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal.
Alwadai, M. (2014). Islamic teachers' perceptions of improving critical thinking skills in Saudi Arabian elementary schools. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
Alwehaibi, H. U. (2012). Novel program to promote critical thinking among higher education students: Empirical study from Saudi Arabia. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 193.
Bataineh, O., & Alazzi, K. F. (2009). Perceptions of Jordanian Secondary Schools Teachers towards Critical Thinking. International Education, 38(2), 4.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas.
Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy and Learning, 53–65. Charles Bazerman, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Beach, S. (1991). Shakespeare and company. University of Nebraska Press.
Behak, F. P., & Massari, N. (2009). Intertextuality: A superhighway to critical thinking in the reading and writing classroom. Kolej Universiti Islam Malaysia (KUIM). Bandar Baru Nilai
Cairney, T., & Langbien, S. (1989). Building communities of readers and writers. The Reading Teacher, 42(8), 560–567.
Cairney, T. (1990). Intertextuality: Infectious echoes from the past. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 478–484.
Chi, F.M. (2001). Intertextual talk as collaborative shared inquiry in learning English as a foreign language.
Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.
Creswell, J. W. (1988). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dahal, H. R., & Ghimire, L. N. (2002). Genre and intertextuality: Pedagogical implications in teaching of writing. Journal of NELTA, 7(1-2), 96–101.
Durkin, K. (2008). The adaptation of East Asian masters students to western norms of critical thinking and argumentation in the UK. Intercultural Education, 19(1), 15–27.
Fox, D. L. (1991). Building a Reading Community:" Intertextuality" and the Adult Reader. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 18(3), 176–185.
Freedman, S. W., & Ball, A. (2004). Ideological becoming: Bakhtinian concepts to guide the study of language, Literacy and Learning. Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning, 3–71. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 12 October, 2021 from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.513.8538&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Gee, J. P. & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375–406.
Hale, D. J. (1998). Social Formalism: The Novel in Theory from Henry James to the Present. Stanford University Press.
Hanssen, E., Harste, J., & Short, K. G. (1990). In conversation: Theory and instruction. Beyond communication: Reading comprehension and criticism, 259-281. Vintage.
Harste, J. C. (1988). Creating classrooms for authors: The reading-writing connection. Heinemann Educational Books, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801.
Hartman, D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 520–561. JSTOR
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. Psychology Press.
Hollowell, A. E. (2010). Revising Basic Christian Ethics: Rethinking Paul Ramsey’s Early Contributions to Moral Theology. Studies in Christian Ethics, 23(3), 267-283.
Koldewyn, E. A. (1998). Building the Prior Knowledge of Disadvantaged First-Grade Students through the Use of Field Experiences. Complete
Kristeva, J. (1986a). The kristeva reader. Columbia University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1986b). Word, Dialogue and Novel. The Kristeva Reader, Ed. Toril Moi, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Kundu, R. (2007). EM Forster's A Passage to India. Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
Lenski, S. D. (2001). Intertextual connections during discussions about literature. Reading Psychology, 22(4), 313–335.
Mosenthal, P. D. (2007). Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 269-284).
Nelson, N. (2008). The reading-writing nexus in discourse research. I C. Bazerman (Red.). Handbook of research on writing. Lawrence Erlbaum. New York.
Ögeyik, M. C. (2008). Subjectivity and Objectivity in Literature Education in Foreign Language Teaching Programs The Paradigms of Foreign Language Teaching and Literature. MA Thesis. Trakya University. Retrieved 12 August 2021 from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/50609725.pdf
Porter, J. E. (1986). Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5(1), 34–47.
Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75.
Rugh, W. A. (2002). Arab education: Tradition, growth and reform. The Middle East Journal, 56(3) 396–414. Retrieved 15 September, 2021 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4329785
Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Johor Bahru. Retrieved 23 October, 2021 from http://www.fp.utm.my/websim/doct/An%20introduction%20to%20Critical%20thingking.pdf
Shannan, D. G. (2016). Intertextuality in Ian McEwan’s selected novels. MA Thesis. The University of Al-Qadissiya. Qadissiya.
Short, E. C. (Ed.). (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. SUNY Press.
UNDP, A. (2003). Arab Human Development Report (2003): Building a Knowledge Society. New York: National Press.
Wade, S.E., & Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D.
Young, R. (1981). Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. Routledge & Kegan Paul Boston.
