Sensorimotor Grounding of Chinese Novel Concepts Constructed From Language Alone
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1205.17Keywords:
sensorimotor experience, grounded cognition, Chinese novel concepts, language comprehensionAbstract
The embodied cognitive view of language asserts that concepts are grounded in sensorimotor experience. In support of this assumption, previous studies have shown that the response times were faster when the movement direction of participants is congruent with the referent position of presented words than that under incongruent condition. This is thought to be evidence that processing these words reactivates sensorimotor experiential traces. Extrapolating from this view, this study aims to explore how concepts without direct experience can be grounded. Participants learned novel concepts related to upward or downward concepts only through a two-sentence description and learned randomly paired novel words. In both experiments, participants judged the sensibility of sentences by upward or downward movements, with the sentences containing novel concepts in Experiment 1 and containing novel words in Experiment 2. Both two experiments found the congruency effect, indicating that when understanding a sentence containing a novel concept or novel word, the sensorimotor experience of the already known concepts in description had been activated automatically, thus realizing the indirect grounding of the novel concept.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825-850.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558-565.
Gunther, F., Nguyen, T., Chen, L., Dudschig, C., Kaup, B., & Glenberg, A. M. (2020). Immediate sensorimotor grounding of novel concepts learned from language alone. Journal of Language and Memory, 115, 104172.
Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 1006-1033.
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. North-Holland, 42, 335-346.
Lachmair, M., Dudschig, C., De Filippis, M., de la Vega, I., & Kaup, B. (2011). Root versus roof: Automatic activation of location information during word processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1180-1188.
Li, H. (2013). Research on the causes of spatial bias: Theoretical explanation and prospect. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 637-642.
Li, R. R., Ma, Y. K., & Lin, H. S. (2012). Embodied emotion: a new paradigm in emotion research. Journal of Psychological Science, 35(03), 754-759
Lv, J. M., & Lu, Z. Y. (2013). Why is happiness "up" and sadness "down": Vertical spatial metaphor of emotion in textual reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 36(2): 328-334.
Öttl, B., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2017). Forming associations between language and sensorimotor traces during novel word learning. Language and Cognition, 9, 156-171.
Papesh, M. H. (2015). Just out of reach: On the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, e116-e141.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-457.
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychol Sci, 12, 153-156.
Stanfield, R. A., Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shape of objects. Psychol Sci, 13, 168-171.
Sze, W. P., Liow, S. J. R., & Yap M. J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 263-273.
Wang, R. M., Mo, L., Wu, L. M, & Li, L. (2006). The influence of spatial information representation on semantic correlation judgment. Journal of Psychological Science, 29(06), 1320-1323.
Wang. H. L., Jiang, Z. L., Feng, X. H., & Lu, Z. Y. (2020). Spatial iconicity of moral concepts: Co-dependence of linguistic and embodied symbols. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(2), 128-138.
Zhang, E. T., Fang, J., Lin, W. Y., & Luo, J. L. (2013). Embodied cognitive view of abstract concept representation. Advances In Psychological Science, 21(03), 429-436.
Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of action and perception in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press.
