Analysis of Speech Humor in Crosstalk From Principles of Cooperation and Relevance Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1109.15Keywords:
humorous, cooperative principle, relevance theoryAbstract
Cross talk is one of the unique performing arts in China, and most crosstalk gives the audience happy feelings through the delivery of humorous language. This paper interprets the generation of humor in crosstalk through the cooperation principles and the relevance theory, and the generation of the humorous results comes from the contrast between ostensive-inference model and the contrast between maximal relevance and optimal relevance.
References
Daren Tan. (1997). Humor and Speech Humor. Beijing: Beijing•Life•Reading, Xinzhi Sanlian Bookstore.
Fei Wang. (2017). See the Humorous Words in Crosstalk “I Want to Attend the Spring Festival Gala” From the Perspective of Relevance Theory. Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College, 3,151-153.
Feng Xie, Shuyun Zheng. (2007). Humour and the Discourse Analysis of Chinese Crosstalk. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 4,417-420.
Jinbang Du,Weihe Zhong. (2013). Discourse Analysis. Wuhan: Wuhan Publishing House.
Liya Song, Xiaomin Yao. (2019). Interpretation of English Jokes and Speech Humor From the Perspective of Relevance theory. Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Education, 5, 127-129.
Mengjing Liu. (2020). Study on Verbal Humor in Crosstalk Art .Central China Normal University.
Ning Wang. (2013). Crosstalk Speech Humor From the Perspective of Cooperation Principles and Relevance Theory. Hebei University.
Qing Yang. (2011). Analysis of Word Humor in the Movie “The King’s Speech”. Film literature, 19, 147-148.
Shiyan Zhang. (2021). The Overall Relevance in the Classroom—Based on Lesson Analysis. Basic Education Course, 5, 43-50.
Sperber & Wilson. (2001). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Xue Liang. (2012). Study the Verbal Humor in English Jokes From the Perspective of Relevance Theory. Liaoning University.
Zheshi Mao. (2005). The Relevance of the Crosstalk Language. Rhetoric Learning, 6, 75-77.
