Reconstructing Meaning Across Cultures: The Kazakh and English Kutadgu Bilig in Comparative Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1610.29Keywords:
Kutadgu Bilig, Robert Dankoff, Askar Yegeubayev, meaning reconstruction, Turkic literary traditionAbstract
This study offers a comparative examination of the Kazakh and English translations of Kutadgu Bilig, an eleventh-century didactic poem composed by the Turkic scholar Yusuf Balasaguni. Grounded in Descriptive Translation Studies and current frameworks of cultural translation, the research approaches both translations as autonomous interpretive texts shaped by the norms and expectations of their respective target cultures, rather than measuring them against the medieval source. The analysis centers on core philosophical and ethical concepts – justice, fortune, intellect, the ultimate purpose of human life, law and custom (törü), modesty as a guardian of personhood (uyat), and active virtue (edgülük) – alongside Qur'anic allusions and culturally specific idiomatic expressions. The results reveal that the English translation tends toward the universalization of philosophical content and the segmentation of unified Turkic-Islamic concepts into clusters of narrower, register-specific terms, situating the work within an ethical framework accessible to a global readership. The Kazakh translation, by contrast, preserves these concepts as unified conceptual nodes and sustains religious depth and culturally embedded meaning, maintaining the text's connection to the Turkic-Islamic intellectual heritage. The study concludes that translation constitutes an act of cultural interpretation rather than mere linguistic transference, fundamentally reshaping the philosophical and ideological dimensions of classical works.
References
Baker, M. (2006). Translation and conflict: A narrative account. Routledge.
Bassnett, S. (2014). Translation studies (4th ed.). Routledge.
Burnett, C. (2009). The coherence of the Arabic–Latin translation program in Toledo. Science in Context, 14(1–2), 249–288.
Chesterman, A. (1997). Memes of translation. John Benjamins.
Dankoff, R. (1983). Wisdom of royal glory (Kutadgu Bilig). University of Chicago Press.
Even-Zohar, I. (1990). Polysystem studies. Poetics Today, 11(1), 1–94.
Gutas, D. (1998). Greek thought, Arabic culture: The Graeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early Abbasid society (2nd–4th/8th–10th centuries). Routledge.
Hasse, D. N. (2016). Success and suppression: Arabic sciences and philosophy in the Renaissance. Harvard University Press.
Hermans, T. (1999). Translation in systems. St. Jerome.
Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The venture of Islam: Conscience and history in a world civilization (Vols. 1–3). University of Chicago Press.
House, J. (2015). Translation quality assessment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame. Routledge.
Munday, J. (2016). Introducing translation studies (4th ed.). Routledge.
Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islamic philosophy from its origin to the present: Philosophy in the land of prophecy. State University of New York Press.
Pym, A. (2010). Exploring translation theories. Routledge.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Snell-Hornby, M. (2006). The turns of translation studies. John Benjamins.
Taylor, R. C. (2012). The role of translation in medieval Islamic philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(3), 389–412.
Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. John Benjamins.
Tymoczko, M. (2007). Enlarging translation, empowering translators. St. Jerome.
Venuti, L. (1995). The translator's invisibility. Routledge.
Venuti, L. (2012). The translation studies reader (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Yegeubayev, A. (2007). Zhusip Balasugun. Qutti Biliq. Almaty.
