The Conception of Women’s Identity and Subjectivity in Margaret Atwood’s Novels: A Feminist Perspective

Authors

  • Irmayani Hasanuddin University
  • Fathu Rahman Hasanuddin University
  • Herawaty Abbas Hasanuddin University
  • M Amir Pattu Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1610.21

Keywords:

feminism, gynocriticism, women’s identity, subjectivity, Margaret Atwood

Abstract

This article aims at revealing the women’s identity and subjectivity being represented in Margaret Atwood’s selected novels. This study employed the qualitative descriptive method. Data were collected from four of Atwood’s novels: The Edible Woman (1969), The Handmaid’s Tale (1985, 2017), The Blind Assassin (2000), and The Testaments (2019). The analysis was conducted using the feminist literary criticism, particularly gynocriticism. The research result indicates that, by considering several factors such as Atwood’s background as the Canadian writer who emphasizes the themes of the victimization and survival and her position as the realist writer, Atwood constructs the women’s identity and subjectivity based on the women’s personalities shaped by the concrete social realities. From the perspective of the feminist thought, Atwood’s novels portray the female’s characters through various paradigms, particularly those associated with the second-wave and third-wave feminisms. In the context of the second-wave feminism, Atwood emphasizes the women’s effort to discover the “true” identity and subjectivity. Meanwhile, from the third-wave feminist perspective, she depicts the women’s identity and subjectivity in terms of the social discourse formation.

Author Biographies

Irmayani, Hasanuddin University

Faculty of Cultural Sciences

Fathu Rahman, Hasanuddin University

Faculty of Cultural Sciences

Herawaty Abbas, Hasanuddin University

Faculty of Cultural Sciences

M Amir Pattu, Hasanuddin University

Faculty of Cultural Sciences

References

Abbas, H. (2001). The Notion of Power as It is Reflected in the Edible Woman and Karmila: A Comparative Study. Retrieved October 5, 2025, from https://library2.smu.ca/handle/01/22731

Arora, R., Jha, S., & Bhadury, P. (2017). Reconfiguring Self Through Artistic Discourse: A Study of The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education, 3(1), 474–486.

Atwood, M. (1969). The Edible Woman. Anchor Books.

Atwood, M. (2000). The Blind Assassin. Anchor Books.

Atwood, M. (2012). Survival: A thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. House of Anansi Press.

Atwood, M. (2017). The Handmaid’s Tale. Anchor Books. (Original work published 1985)

Atwood, M. (2019). The Testaments. Anchor books.

Atwood, M. (2022). Burning Questions: Essay and Occasional Pieces 2004-2021. Doubleday.

Barker, C. (2012). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. Sage Publication.

Bouson, J. B. (Ed.). (2013). Critical Insight: Margaret Atwood. Salem Press.

Bressel, C. E. (1994). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. Routledge.

Donovan, J. (2000). Feminist Theory: The Intellectual Tradition. The Continuum International Publishing.

Eagleton, M. (1996). Who’s Who and Where’s Where: Constructing Feminist Literary Studies. Feminist Review, 53(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1996.15

Eagleton, M. (2003). A Concise Companion to Feminist Theory. Blackwell Publishing.

Gay, R. (2025). The Portable Feminist Reader. Penguin books.

Gerson, G. (2002). Liberal Feminism: Individuality and Oppositions in Wollstonecraft and Mill. Political Studies, 50(4), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00008

Hall, D. E. (2004). Subjectivity. Routledge.

Howells, A. C. (2006). The Cambridge companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge University Press.

Macpherson, H. S. (2010). The Cambridge introduction to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge University Press.

Obidič, A. (2017). Margaret Atwood’s Postcolonial and Postmodern Feminist Novels with Psychological and Mythic Influences: The Archetypal Analysis of the Novel Surfacing. Acta Neophilologica, 50(1–2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.4312/an.50.1-2.5-24

Snaith, H. (2017). Dystopia, gerontology and the writing of Margaret Atwood. Feminist Review, 116(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0068-5

Showalter, E. (1985). The New Feminist Criticism: Essay on Women, Literature and Theory. Pan-American.

Tolan, F. (2004). Connecting Theory and Fiction: Margaret Atwood’s Novels and Second Wave Feminism [Doctoral dissertation, Durham University]. Retrieved October 7, 2025, from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2972/1/2972_995.pdf

Tolan. F. (2007). Margaret Atwood: Feminism and Fiction. Rodopi.

Wallace, E. K. (2009). Encyclopedia of Literary Theory. Routledge.

Walter, M. (2005). Feminism: A Very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Waugh, P. (1989). Feminine Fictions: Revisiting the Postmodern. Routledge.

Weedon, C. (1993). Feminist Practice & Poststructuralist Theory. Blackwell Published.

Weedon, C. (2004). Identity and Culture: Narratives of Difference and Belonging. Open University Press.

Weiss, J. (2023). The Gender Performances of Margaret Atwood's Aunt Lydia in “The Testaments”. Journal of Literary Studies, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/12977

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles