Improving English Majors’ Speaking Through Discourse Marker Instruction: A Case Study at a Vietnamese University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1610.09Keywords:
discourse markers, speaking fluency, pragmatic competence, EFL students, VietnamAbstract
The current study was conducted at a university in Vietnam to investigate the effects of discourse marker instruction on the speaking performance of second-year English majors. Specifically, it examined changes in the frequency of discourse marker use, overall speaking ability, functional appropriateness in the use of discourse markers, and students’ perceptions of learning about discourse markers. The study employed a mixed-methods design involving both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Eighty second-year English-major students participated in the study and were divided into two groups: an experimental group of 40 students who received function-based discourse marker instruction over a period of five weeks, and a control group of 40 students who were taught using traditional methods. Data were collected through pre-tests administered before the intervention, post-tests conducted after the intervention, an eight-item questionnaire on students’ perceptions of learning discourse markers, and semi-structured interviews consisting of three questions for the experimental group. The findings revealed that the experimental group, which received explicit instruction on discourse markers, showed significant improvement in overall speaking ability compared to the control group, with the mean score rising from 5.78 (SD = 0.96) in the pre-test to 6.85 (SD = 0.99) in the post-test. In addition, the frequency of discourse marker use in spoken communication increased considerably after the instruction. Most students also reported positive perceptions of the instruction, particularly regarding improvements in fluency, coherence, and speaking confidence, as reflected in the questionnaire and interview data. The study suggests that explicit, function-based instruction in discourse markers is an effective pedagogical approach to improving EFL learners’ speaking ability and should be systematically integrated into speaking courses.
References
Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.
Brown, D., Fernández, J., & Huensch, A. (2023). The role of pragmatic markers in perceptions of L2 fluency in dialogue. System, 119, 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103157
Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge guide to learning English as a second language. Cambridge University Press.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford University Press.
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2010). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206
Crible, L. (2018). Discourse markers and (dis)fluency: Forms and functions across languages and registers. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.286
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.
Ding & Yusof (2025). Investigating the role of AI-powered conversation bots in enhancing L2 speaking skills and reducing speaking anxiety: A mixed methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05550-z
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5
Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Jones, L. (1981). Functions of English. Cambridge University Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press.
Müller, S. (2019). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. In S. Müller (Ed.), Discourse markers in second language acquisition (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.303
Nguyen, T. Q. (2024). The importance of discourse markers in English speaking: A case study of 3rd year English majors at Haiphong University. Journal of Educational Equipment: Applied Research, 2(311), 45-48.
Nguyen, T. L., & Tran, Q. H. (2020). Teaching speaking skills in Vietnamese universities: A discourse-based perspective. Vietnam Journal of Education, 4(3), 22–29.
Peltonen, P. (2024). Fluency revisited. ELT Journal, 78(4), 489–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad047
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841
Suryadi, S., Muhyidin, A., & Syafrizal, S. (2024). Using discourse markers to enhance students’ speaking skills. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(3), 1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i3.1002
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2020). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Tran Thanh Du, Ly Thien Binh, Dang Thi Bao Dung, & Nguyen Huu The. (2025). The use of discourse markers in non-native speaker speech: A case from Vietnam. Arab World English Journal, 16(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no2.2
Truong, P. S. (2022). Using English discourse markers to enhance speaking skills: A case study at a Vietnamese university. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(5), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22256
Van, P. T. H. (2022). EFL learners’ deployment of discourse markers in IELTS essays: From beliefs to practices. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 38(6), 170-178.
Vietnamese Ministry of Education and Training. (2014). Circular No. 01/2014/TT-BGDĐT: Promulgating the 6-level foreign language proficiency framework for Vietnam. Ministry of Education and Training.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772
