What Do English Learners Ask? A Categorization of Language Questions on HiNative

Authors

  • Rashed Saad Alsharif Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1608.34

Keywords:

learner-generated questions, informal digital learning of English (IDLE), language learner autonomy, online language learning platforms

Abstract

This paper examines the types of English-language questions posed by learners on HiNative, a global peer-to-peer language learning platform. While online question-and-answer platforms have been widely adopted for language learning, the linguistic focus and distribution of learner-generated questions in self-access digital environments remain underexplored. Drawing on a linguistic content analysis approach informed by learner autonomy, the study systematically classifies learners’ questions across key linguistic domains. Using qualitative content analysis, a dataset of 783 learner-generated inquiries was categorized into key linguistic domains (grammar, vocabulary, usage, pronunciation, idioms, translation, comparison, formality/contextual use, and other). The findings reveal a predominant focus on meaning-oriented questions, particularly translation (34.2% of all questions) and vocabulary (21.5%), while grammar and pronunciation queries were comparatively rare. This distribution suggests that learners prioritize communicative meaning, lexical expansion, and pragmatic appropriateness over formal rule-focused learning. Such inquiry patterns highlight learners’ reliance on their first language as a bridge to the target language and their pursuit of precise and natural usage in authentic contexts. These results contribute to second language acquisition research by offering insights into learner priorities in informal, technology-mediated settings, with implications for the design of adaptive learning resources and learner support systems.

Author Biography

Rashed Saad Alsharif, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)

Department of English Language and Literature, College of Languages and Translation

References

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/te.2015.3.3.002

Alsenafi, B., AlSabbagh, S., Alhaji, B., & Alghasab, M. (2024). Social Media and Language Learning: How: EFL Students Use Online Platforms for Language Learning at the College of Basic Education in Kuwait. World Journal of Education, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v14n4p1

Alshumrani, H. A. (2024). Unveiling vocabulary teaching and learning beliefs of teachers and learners in an EFL context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00242-0

Bajorek, J. P. (2017). L2 pronunciation tools: The unrealized potential of prominent computer-assisted language learning software. Issues and Trends in Learning Technologies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v5i1_bajorek

Behzad, S., Sakaguchi, K., Schneider, N., & Zeldes, A. (2023). ELQA: A Corpus of Metalinguistic Questions and Answers about English. In A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, & N. Okazaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (Vol. 1, pp. 2031–2047). Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.113

Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge.

Blanchette, J. (2007). Questions in the online learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 37–57.

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies. Oxford University Press.

Gao, F., Wang, C., Xie, H., & Hong, J. (2024). Social interaction and online learning efficiency for middle school students: The mediating role of social presence and learning engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100896

Henriksen, B. (2013). Research on L2 learners’ collocational competence and development–a progress report. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist, & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use (pp. 29–56). Erosla.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Inayati, N., Sanjani, M. I., Jayanti, F. G., Gao, X. (Andy), & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2024). Online informal language learning (OILL): A systematic review of studies (2014–2023). Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 19(4), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2355296

Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8

Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417

Larsson, T., & Kaatari, H. (2020). Syntactic complexity across registers: Investigating (in)formality in second-language writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100850.

Lee, J. S. (2021). Informal digital learning of English: Research to practice. Routledge.

Lee, J. S., & Sylvén, L. K. (2021). The role of Informal Digital Learning of English in Korean and Swedish EFL learners’ communication behaviour. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13082

Liang, T., Singh, C. K. S., Mulyadi, D., & Singh, T. S. M. (2025). Enhancing EFL Writing Through Online Peer Feedback: A Systematic Review of Higher Education Studies. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n1p184

Little, D. (1991). Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.

Liu, G., Ma, C., Bao, J., & Liu, Z. (2023). Toward a model of informal digital learning of English and intercultural competence: A large-scale structural equation modeling approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(3), 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2191652

Noorwali, S., & Sabir, M. (2025). Investigating Technology Use and Learners’ Autonomy among Saudi EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 11, 126–143. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call11.8

Nushi, M., Izadi, T., & Jozagian, M. (2023). HiNative: A Global Q&A Platform to Learn Language and Culture. Issues and Trends in Learning Technologies, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2458/itlt.2999

Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000192

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44466

Sánchez, A. M. (2013). A corpus-based analysis of errors in adult EFL writings. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada, 13(13), 1–6.

Soyoof, A., Reynolds, B. L., Vazquez-Calvo, B., & McLay, K. (2021). Informal digital learning of English (IDLE): A scoping review of what has been done and a look towards what is to come. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 608–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936562

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.

Wang, H., & Chen, C. W. (2019). Learning English from YouTubers: English L2 learners’ self-regulated language learning on YouTube. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1607356

Wang, P. (2022). Relooking at the roles of translanguaging in English as a foreign language classes for multilingual learners: Practices and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 850649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850649

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (Vol. 111). Edward Arnold London.

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Self-regulated second language learning: A review of types and benefits of strategies, modes of teacher support, and pedagogical implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 720–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055081

Zhang, Y., & Liu, G. (2022). Revisiting informal digital learning of English (IDLE): A structural equation modeling approach in a university EFL context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1904–1936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2134424

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles