Misinterpretation of Diplomatic Language and Conflict Escalation: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis of Four International Crises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1608.24Keywords:
diplomatic language, miscommunication, conflict escalation, pragmatics, translationAbstract
Diplomatic crises are commonly examined through strategic or institutional frameworks, yet the role of linguistic interpretation in shaping escalation dynamics remains under-theorized. This article analyzes how misinterpretation of diplomatic language contributes to conflict escalation through a comparative qualitative study of four international crises: the Cuban Missile Crisis (1962), the Iraq War (2003), the Russia-Ukraine conflict (2014), and the Israel-Hamas war (2023-2024). Drawing on speech act theory, pragmatics, intercultural communication, practice theory, signaling theory, and translation studies, the analysis traces how illocutionary intent, pragmatic inference, diplomatic repertoires, and cross-linguistic mediation interact under strategic uncertainty. Across cases, the findings reveal recurrent patterns of communicative breakdown, including misalignment between illocutionary force and perlocutionary effect, failures of diplomatic recognition, and meaning shifts introduced through translation. The article conceptualizes miscommunication as a structural feature of crisis diplomacy and highlights the central role of language and mediation in shaping escalation and restraint.
References
Agildere, S. T. (2009). Les interprètes au carrefour des cultures: Ou les drogmans dans l’Empire ottoman (XVIe-début du XXe siècle) [Interpreters at the crossroads of cultures: Or dragomans in the Ottoman Empire (16th–early 20th century)]. Babel, 55(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.55.1.01agi
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Little, Brown.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Barkho, L. (2010). News from the BBC, CNN, and Al-Jazeera: How the three broadcasters cover the Middle East. Hampton Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Cap, P. (2017). The language of fear: Communicating threat in public discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1
Charalambous, C., Zembylas, M., & Aristidou, X. (2025). Rethinking intercultural communication beyond verbal language: Affect, embodiment and materiality in times of ‘crisis’. Language and Intercultural Communication, 25(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2025.2552529
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913390
El Damanhoury, K., Saleh, F., & Lebovic, M. (2025). Covering the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: A critical discourse analysis of Al Jazeera English and BBC’s online reporting on the 2023 Gaza War. Journalism and Media, 6(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010009
Faizullaev, A. (2017). Symbolic insult in diplomacy. Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, 2(4), 1–116. https://doi.org/10.1163/24056006-12340008
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Fursenko, A., & Naftali, T. (1997). One hell of a gamble: Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958–1964. W. W. Norton.
Gudykunst, W. B. (2004). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (4th ed.). Sage.
Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
Hodges, A. (2011). The ‘war on terror’ narrative: Discourse and intertextuality in the construction and contestation of sociopolitical reality. Oxford University Press.
Holtsova, M., & Khodarchenko, A. (2021). The genre differentiation and linguistic peculiarities of English diplomatic discourse. International Journal of Philology, 12(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2021.02.104
House, J. (2016). Translation as communication across languages and cultures. Routledge.
House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954587
Iqbal, S., & Farukh, A. (2025). Framing narratives: Media representation of metaphors and ideologies in the Israel–Palestine conflict. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), Article 2564883. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2564883
Jönsson, C., & Hall, M. (2005). Essence of diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511040
Kamyanets, A. (2024). Constructing competing discourses on the Russo-Ukrainian war: Journalistic translation in wartime. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 29, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2024-29-02
Lafont Rapnouil, M. (2024). The brutalization of diplomacy? The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 19(4), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-20241542
Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (1994). We all lost the Cold War. Princeton University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj017
May, E. R., & Zelikow, P. (2001). The Kennedy tapes: Inside the White House during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Harvard University Press.
Mazraani, N. (1995). Functions of Arabic political discourse: The case of Saddam Hussein’s speeches. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik, 30, 22–36.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating. Brill.
Pouliot, V. (2008). The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization, 62(2), 257–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080090
Pouliot, V., & Cornut, J. (2015). Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715574913
Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213516696
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Seleskovitch, D., & Lederer, M. (1984). Interpréter pour traduire. Didier Érudition.
Sorensen, T. C. (1965). Kennedy. Harper & Row.
Stieb, J. (2023). Why did the United States invade Iraq? The debate at 20 years. Texas National Security Review, 6(3), 11–28.
Takei, M. (2024). Audience costs and the credibility of public versus private threats in international crises. International Studies Quarterly, 68(3), sqae091. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae091
Trager, R. (2017). Diplomacy: Communication and the origins of international order. Cambridge University Press.
Vermeer, H. J. (1989). Skopos and commission in translational action. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in translation theory (pp. 173–187). Oy Finn Lectura Ab.
Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R., & Forchtner, B. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of language and politics. Routledge.
Yang, M. (2012). The principles and tactics on diplomatic translation: A Chinese perspective. Babel, 58(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.58.1.01min
Yang, W., Syed Abdullah, S. N. B., Ang, L. H., & Yang, M. (2025). Three-dimensional transformation in the English translation of China’s Foreign Ministry spokespersons’ conflictive responses. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p241
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Zaczynska, K., Bourgonje, P., & Stede, M. (2024). How diplomats dispute: The UN Security Council conflict corpus. In N. Calzolari, M.-Y. Kan, V. Hoste, A. Lenci, S. Sakti, & N. Xue (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024) (pp. 8173–8183). ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.716/
Zarefsky, D. (2007). Making the case for war: Colin Powell at the United Nations. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 10(2), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2007.0043
